> but Im getting hammered by my management for instant answers...they
asked last night and expect an answer this morning.and I'm expected to
catch up and deploy several important solutions/projects all hinging on IPA
ASAP...
>
> 2.2 isnt in RHEL6.3 though?
>
Are you using fedora, cen
> Steven Jones
>
> Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
>
> Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
>
> 0064 4 463 6272
>
>
> From: Rob Crittenden [rcrit...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 June 2012 8:31 a.m.
> To: Steven Jones
> C
2012 8:31 a.m.
To: Steven Jones
Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Do clients have to be in teh same DNS zone / FQDN
as the IPA servers / Kerberos Realm?
Steven Jones wrote:
> I assume with no reply, now one knows?
That's not really fair, it hasn't even been 2
Steven Jones wrote:
I assume with no reply, now one knows?
That's not really fair, it hasn't even been 24 hours.
My IPA servers are say ipa1 and 2.ipa.example.com
I have existing linux servers that I would rather not change the FQDN on, say
server1.example.com Do I actually have to make th
[steven.jo...@vuw.ac.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 June 2012 2:17 p.m.
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: [Freeipa-users] Do clients have to be in teh same DNS zone / FQDN as
the IPA servers / Kerberos Realm?
My IPA servers are say ipa1 and 2.ipa.example.com
I have existing linux servers that I would
My IPA servers are say ipa1 and 2.ipa.example.com
I have existing linux servers that I would rather not change the FQDN on, say
server1.example.com Do I actually have to make the client
server1.ipa.example.com or can I leave it as is at server1.example.com? Would
that give any IPA problems? or
