11:23 p.m.
> To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Why not unix UIDs (numbers and range)
>
> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 04:42 +, Steven Jones wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why doesnt IPA use std unix UIDs? and how does that translate into Unix
>> permissio
ds
Steven
From: freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com [freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com] on
behalf of Stephen Gallagher [sgall...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 11:23 p.m.
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Why not unix UIDs (numbers and rang
From: freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com [freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com] on
behalf of Stephen Gallagher [sgall...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2011 11:23 p.m.
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Why not unix UIDs (numbers and range
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 04:42 +, Steven Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why doesnt IPA use std unix UIDs? and how does that translate into Unix
> permissions on a client if it does not?
>
> BTW neat install, under 10mins and its up!
FreeIPA does use standard UNIX UIDs and GIDs. By default, however,
t
Hi,
Why doesnt IPA use std unix UIDs? and how does that translate into Unix
permissions on a client if it does not?
BTW neat install, under 10mins and its up!
:D
regards
Steven
___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.red
