On 26/10/16 20:00, lejeczek wrote:
hi all
quick question - does IPA rpms depend on samaba's?
I'm hoping I can remove samba-common but dnf fies a 46 packages long
list of dependencies - is it somehow broken?
If is not and that is 100% correct long chain of deps - then can samba
be safely downgrad
On 26/10/2016 21:03, Ranbir wrote:
If I have two networks, say A and B, and I want both to use the same
FreeIPA server, should I have one Freeipa domain for network A and a
sub-domain for network B, (domain.local and b.domain.local), or should
I create two top level domains (a.local and b.loc
Am 26.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Basti:
>
>
>
> On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26.10.2016 16:42, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Martin Basti:
>
>
>
> On 26.
On 27.10.2016 10:02, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 16:42, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016
On to, 27 loka 2016, David Kupka wrote:
On 26/10/16 20:00, lejeczek wrote:
hi all
quick question - does IPA rpms depend on samaba's?
I'm hoping I can remove samba-common but dnf fies a 46 packages long
list of dependencies - is it somehow broken?
If is not and that is 100% correct long chain of
On to, 27 loka 2016, Brian Candler wrote:
On 26/10/2016 21:03, Ranbir wrote:
If I have two networks, say A and B, and I want both to use the same
FreeIPA server, should I have one Freeipa domain for network A and a
sub-domain for network B, (domain.local and b.domain.local), or
should I crea
Am 27.10.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jochen Demmer:
>
>
> Am 26.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Basti:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 16:42, Jochen Demmer wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.10.
Am 27.10.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Martin Basti:
>
>
>
> On 27.10.2016 10:02, Jochen Demmer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 26.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Basti:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
>
>
>
> On 26.
On 10/27/2016 10:48 AM, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 27.10.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 27.10.2016 10:02, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.201
On 27/10/2016 09:30, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Yes, you can do that, there is no issue at all.
Thank you for confirming that.
To the OP: in that case, I'd still recommend that you choose a distinct
kerberos realm like IPA.YOURCOMPANY.COM, with associated primary domain
"ipa.yourcompany.com",
On 27/10/16 09:28, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
# rpm -q --requires freeipa-server|grep ^lib|xargs -n1 rpm
-q --whatprovides|sort -u
glibc-2.23.1-10.fc24.x86_64
krb5-libs-1.14.4-4.fc24.x86_64
libcom_err-1.42.13-4.fc24.x86_64
libgcc-6.2.1-2.fc24.x86_64
libsss_nss_idmap-1.14.2-1.fc24.x86_64
libtallo
Hello,
I am no automount expert so I will leave answering those questions to
those but see my comment inline.
On 10/27/2016 06:16 AM, William Muriithi wrote:
Evening,
I am trying to import some autos map from a file to FreeIPA LDAP and
have noticed two problems that can be considered a bug i
On 27.10.2016 10:33, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 27.10.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jochen Demmer:
Am 26.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 16:42, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016
On 10/27/2016 10:48 AM, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 27.10.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 27.10.2016 10:02, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016 17:25, Jochen Demmer wrote:
Am 26.10.2016 um 16:48 schrieb Martin Basti:
On 26.10.2016
Standa Laznicka wrote:
Hello,
I am no automount expert so I will leave answering those questions to
those but see my comment inline.
On 10/27/2016 06:16 AM, William Muriithi wrote:
Evening,
I am trying to import some autos map from a file to FreeIPA LDAP and
have noticed two problems that can
Joshua Ruybal wrote:
While trying to run IPA replica prepare with debug, we see an
unexplained failure.
Debug seems to show the process running smoothly, then I see:
"Certificate issuance failed".
Looking at previous mail-archives, I see that someone has run into this
before, however all permis
HI!
I wonder which action in the FreeIPA Web UI (4.2.0) moves an active user to this
container:
cn=deleted users,cn=accounts,cn=provisioning,dc=example,dc=com
Selecting [Delete] as action really deletes the LDAP entry.
Likely I missed something.
Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Michael Ströder wrote:
> I wonder which action in the FreeIPA Web UI (4.2.0) moves an active user to
> this container:
>
> cn=deleted users,cn=accounts,cn=provisioning,dc=example,dc=com
>
> Selecting [Delete] as action really deletes the LDAP entry.
Ah, found it myself:
It makes a difference cho
>>
>> [root@hydrogen ~]# ipa automountmap-add-indirect default
>> auto.projects-prs1013 –-mount=/projects/prs1013
>> --parentmap=auto.projects
>
> Is this a direct copy-paste from the terminal? If so and your e-mail client
> did not do any reformatting then the first character in the
> "–-mount=/pr
On 10/27/2016 02:45 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> I wonder which action in the FreeIPA Web UI (4.2.0) moves an active user to
>> this container:
>>
>> cn=deleted users,cn=accounts,cn=provisioning,dc=example,dc=com
>>
>> Selecting [Delete] as action really deletes the LDAP e
Help ?
Best regards.
Bahan
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM, bahan w wrote:
> Re.
>
> There is no time difference between client and server.
>
> I checked the httpd error log and saw no errors.
> Same with the dirsrv error logs.
>
> Any other idea ?
>
> By looking at the log, I'm wondering if
Thank you Petr! I found the problem, but quite by accident... There may
be a Best Practice at hand that I wasn't aware of...
I still have the Windows AD server sitting on the side, serving as DHCP
server and waiting patiently for my Cross Realm Trust; That server will
forward DNS requests to th
On to, 27 loka 2016, Brian Candler wrote:
On 27/10/2016 10:07, Brian Candler wrote:
To the OP: in that case, I'd still recommend that you choose a
distinct kerberos realm like IPA.YOURCOMPANY.COM, with associated
primary domain "ipa.yourcompany.com", and let FreeIPA manage that
domain so that
Fil Di Noto wrote:
> In my imagination, I see IPA for whatever reason comes accross a cert
> it signed in the past and decides it needs to compare the SAN to the
> directory. Then it sees the SAN doesn't have an associated principal
> in the directory. Who does IPA trust? (the directory obviously).
Took a look at the dogtag logs, the debug log only shows the following
every time I run ipa-replica-prepare.
[27/Oct/2016:12:55:02][http-9444-1]: CMSServlet: curDate=Thu Oct 27
12:55:02 EDT 2016 id=caProfileSubmitSSLClient time=10
The other logs don't appear to have anything.
I tried to run ipa
Hello guys,
Thank you for your answers. First, I was able to modify the minified js
to change the default. Ugly solution, but it works for now.
I am trying to write a plugin but it seems that I missed something here
since, despite being executed, the default is not changed ..
Here is my code, f
26 matches
Mail list logo