Congratulations! Thank you again for all of the countless hours you spend on
improving the best and most flexible RADIUS server. One question though - is
there a typo in the V2 upgrade link below? When I click on it I get a 404
error..
Upgrading instructions are available here:
Can someone tell me if it is possible in FR to cache in memory (for a short
amount of time) Calling-Station-Id from successful machine authentications so
that subsequent user authentications can test whether the user is connecting
from an authorized device? This is a feature that is available
i cant find the ntlm_auth file in my OS ,
is it coming with freeradius or we have to
install it separately .
It's part of Samba. A simple google search for ntlm_auth
would have answered that question for you.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I am getting the following errors during compilation on my FreeBSD 8.2 OS:
/usr/include/net/if_arp.h:47: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'u_short'
/usr/include/net/if_arp.h:88: error: field 'arp_pa' has incomplete type
/usr/include/net/if_arp.h:89: error: field 'arp_ha' has
yes i said that freeradius with coovachilli works but with
the access point i think send another request so it fails..
Yes, you did say that. But, I have no idea what you mean by
i think send another request so it fails? As I said
before, read the FAQ (it will tell you to provide debug
but i have problems to the ap... The didn't login...
Do you really think this is enough information for someone to help you?
Did you read the FAQ?
http://wiki.freeradius.org/FAQ#It+still+doesn%27t+work%21
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
if you leave the box unchecked disable server certificate validation
then the blackberry connects fine if you uncheck connection fails
failed to connect.
You wrote, ...if you leave it unchecked... (it)... connects fine if you
uncheck (it the) connection fails???
Did you mean to say if you
Try:
if ((Client-IP-Address == x) || (Client-IP-Address == y)) {
}
No joy :-(. For now, I ended up doing:
if (Called-Station-Id) {
if (Client-IP-Address == x) {
update request {
Huntgroup-Name :=
}
I'm running FR 2.1.6 (I know - I plan to upgrade later this year). Is there
anything wrong syntactically with the following code or is this a bug that was
fixed since 2.1.6?
if (Client-IP-Address == 172.20.16.28 || Client-IP-Address ==
172.20.204.10)) {
update request {
Ok, thanks Alan. I'll split it into two if stmts as a workaround for now..
BTW, when posting the code and trying to make it look nicer, I mangled it. The
original code really looked like this:
if (Called-Station-Id (Client-IP-Address == 172.20.16.28 || \
Try:
if ((Client-IP-Address == x) || (Client-IP-Address == y)) {
}
Thanks for the suggestion Phil. I'll give that a try..
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
It's failing on the inner tunnel with an error that
it has no value specified for the auth type,
but shouldn't that be set by the eap module?
It didn't say no value, it said unknown value. The
debug output showed the value of Auth-Type as
eap_cuesta:
Found Auth-Type = eap_cuesta
WARNING:
You didn't give much information regarding your
environment, so some of the responses below are
based upon assumptions: that you manage all devices
that are connecting, that they are joined to your
A/D domain and that you are using the Windows
supplicant.
You haven't said what version of
Actually i've already a configuration to
dynamic assing VLAN ID with MS-CHAPv2
What reply attribute(s) are you passing
to the switch in this case?
I've done some tests.. can actually authenticated
based on the logs and the switch info, but Dynamic
VLAN isn't configured on the switch
I don't think that I'm using the supplicant but I could
be wrong.
The supplicant is the software on the client device that
manages wireless profiles/connections. If Windows
controls the wireless connections (Wireless Zero Config service) then you are
using the Windows supplicant.
I'm
It does. It is a Aironet 350 device and it has
internal RADIUS as well, which we are able to
authenticate against(using LEAP).
Is this for WLSE authentication to the AP? If not,
do you have other options other than LEAP? If so,
avoid LEAP as many others have said.
-
List
so, in inner-tunnel post-auth, set outer.reply
to be whatever you want.. you can then, in the
outer layer, query/check or use that reply.
There's an additional round trip after the failure
which is why Phil said it needs to be saved. I
had a patch to save/restore it; but, it needs
rework
I found a similar user in an old thread who submitted a patch:
(http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Capturing-ntlm-auth-failure-
reasons-in-rlm-mschap-td2791760.html)
And it appears that this patch made it into the rlm_mschap.c module code:
I submitted that patch and it was included in
I want to ask that NAS provide internet or FreeRADIUS.
What does that mean?
I mean i should connect internet connection to NAS or FreeRADIUS.
Try rephrasing your question and provide more background on
what you are trying to accomplish..
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
FR is configured to send the auth request to AD (MSCHAP
only, Aruba terminates PEAP) using NTLM_AUTH.
Why do you want Aruba to terminate PEAP?
If it IS expired, MSCHAP (or NTLM_AUTH) seems to always
return a reject.
See below...
Also, with new users an account is created with a
In the PEAP properties, EAP-MSCHAP v2, if you DISABLE
automatically use my windows logon name and password and
instead enter the credentials manually it works.
What version of FR are you running? If it's 2.1.10, try it with 2.1.10.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
In the PEAP properties, EAP-MSCHAP v2, if you DISABLE
automatically use my windows logon name and password and
instead enter the credentials manually it works.
Look at:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/MSCHAP-Authentication-Issue-td2785146.html
to see if this is your problem (look
I can/will upgrade, but the symptoms lead me to believe its a windows
thing. What leads you to believe an FR upgrade would fix it?
I sent another response with more info. The issue I'm thinking of is one we
talked about quite a while ago (I asked if you could test it). It's the one
where
One additional note: the fixes that went into 2.1.10 extract (verbatim)
the client username from the EAP-MSCHAPv2 response, and pass that
through to the rlm_mschap module as an extra attribute.
You're right Phil. It's been too long since I wrote that patch.
Gary: Forget what I said about
some of my user trying to login Mikrotik but they cant first time..
You may find that it will be easier for people to help you if you provide
specific details about the problems you are having and what you've done in an
attempt to fix the problems.
You should start by doing Internet searches
I have spent the last few days writing the code to allow rlm_mschap and
rlm_eap_mschapv2 to support password changes.
This is huge Phil! Thanks for taking the time to write this enhancement. I
will test it in our environment over the couple weeks and report findings.
-
List
i have made my modifications
Perhaps if you show us the modifications, someone might be able to suggest
what's wrong.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
so it would need to be set per IP address or range only for
the limits so that the other users in AD can be used for that
Have you thought about using huntgroups to group your NAS together and then
authorize based upon Huntgroup-Name?
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Ok machine authentication works now with computer name from samba.
i can assign vlans also. The switch port appears as up, BUT i can't
ping the machine und i can't login with new users that never before
use this machine (no local useraccount). Why i doesn't get network
access after
When a user gets his login prompt, no access
to the network is allowed because they first
get access when they login and freeradius can
perform an ldap check with the username.
But when a new user wants to login or the user uses an different computer,
the user dosen't exist on this machine
Could you please share the perl scripts and the corresponding
configuration in radiusd.conf like authorize and post-auth section
related to these logs?
Unfortunately, I would need to get a release from my company as the code
belongs to them. I cannot post it at this time. You may want to
Could you please summarize what you did to log the output from
ntlm_auth and MS_CHAP-Error?
Sure. I should mention that other options are available now that didn't exist
when I created the solution below...
I have a PERL script that runs during authorize that obtains user/group or
Yes, I know :) but it would be better if we can solve that
I agree, but I haven't found a better solution (i.e., that's what I do to
workaround the problem).
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Now that I have authentication working. I would like to assign users to
VLANS based on AD group membership.
Any examples would be appreciated.
Did you look here?
http://wiki.freeradius.org/HP (search for Dynamic VLAN assignment)
There area a number of ways to set reply attributes depending
My problem is that rlm_perl duplicate an attribute in %RAD_REPLY hash.
I'm not sure if this will fix it, but try:
use constant RLM_MODULE_UPDATED= 8;# /* OK (pairs modified) */
then change return RLM_MODULE_OK to:
return RLM_MODULE_UPDATED;
If this doesn't fix it, you can always delete
DeKok, Alan wrote:
It's a permanent change. See latest git for a fix.
Thanks Alan. I just retested and, uh, don't shoot the messenger, but now it
dies in event.c:cleanup_delay():
Debug: Waking up in 11.4 seconds.
Error: ASSERT FAILED event.c[536]: (request-child_state ==
shrug Assertions are there to catch sanity failures. In this
case, the request was treated as done without being explicitly
marked done.
Do a git pull. :)
Looks much better - thanks again.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Ah... I don't usually do builds tests without pthreads.
Actually, I am building/testing with pthreads. However, I was running in debug
mode (radiusd -X). The problem does not occur when I don't start radiusd with
-X. Some additional debug code in event.c shows the following sequence of
I'm testing proxying of authentications (it's not something I've done before so
this could be my problem). I have a pool with 2 home servers defined in
proxy.conf. For now, both servers are unreachable (blocked by a firewall).
I'm using git head 2.1.x branch and I'm testing using eapol_test.
Thanks to a lot of work by Phil Mayers, the server now has support for
Microsoft SoH in PEAP, normal RADIUS (MS VPN gateway), and in DHCP.
Wow! That *must* have been a lot of work! Thank you Phil.
Does this mean FreeRADIUS can now act as a Health Policy Server?
-
List
[peap] Received EAP-TLV response.
[peap] Had sent TLV failure. User was rejected earlier in this session.
You need to look earlier in your debug output to see why it was rejected
(that's what this error message means)
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Last call for 2.1.10
I haven't had a chance to rework the patch for saving replies after a PEAP/TTLS
reject (been very busy at work). I'll try to get to it today; but, I assume
it's too late for 2.1.10 at this point, right?
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Uh... eapol-test supports TTLS. See the FreeRADIUS source:
src/tests/eap-ttls-*.conf
Ugh.. I should have checked the doc. I should be able to do the TTLS change
independently (i.e., you can ignore the post to the devel list related to
this). Thanks for enlightening me :-)
-
List
Hmm... OK. The issue appears to be that the tunneled reply is saved
for Access-Accept, but not Access-Reject.
See accept_vps in rlm_eap_peap/*. Something similar needs to be
done for reject, and for TTLS.
You are a gentleman and a scholar! I have made the changes as you suggested
for PEAP
but it seems the next packet sent is a Challenge, not reject/accept.
Therefore the message does not persist until reject/accept time.
Hmm.. It seems I've heard that before:
http://lists.cistron.nl/pipermail/freeradius-users/2009-August/msg00326.html
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Fixed in 2.1.9.
Great (I guess missed that in the change log). Was the change to eliminate the
extra round trip? If so, would you accept a patch to set
Module-Failure-Message upon failure of ntlm_auth in rlm_mschap (as was
originally implemented in the fix for bug 398 in v1.1.4)?
Thanks
I'll take a look...
Thanks.
I'd like to get some feedback on the pre-release of 2.1.10,
especially the changes to the proxy code.
I'll download the latest 2.1.10 tomorrow; unfortunately, I won't have a chance
to test it until next week. Also, we don't use proxying, at the moment, but I
IIRC, it was to remember replies better. When the inner tunnel
returns accept and the outer sends a challenge... remember the
accept for later.
I just cloned and built the latest 2.1.10 to do some testing. I did a
PEAP-MSCHAPv2 authentication, with bad credentials, using eapol_test. What
Understanding the security risks... is there an example of
setting Post-Auth-Type REJECT {...} to override the reject
force the response to Auth-Accept?
If you want to change all REJECTs to ACCEPT so that authentication always
succeeds, then you are effectively eliminating the
if you enable the ldap/(opendirectory) option to require user to change
password on next login the client is unable to connect.
FreeRADIUS doesn't support password changes via MSCHAP. Historically, Samba
didn't even support it until a couple of years ago. I believe support for this
I've done some minor editing to the patches, and put them into the
code for 2.1.10.
I just downloaded and installed 2.1.10 on my test server. So far, everything
looks good. Thank you Alan.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Sending Access-Accept of id 225 to 10.4.1.2 port 2452
Reply-Message := Authorized Users Only
MS-CHAP2-Success =
0x01533d39444636303933394145343137463835384143443632443
9374137343844413541313936
MS-MPPE-Recv-Key = 0xd81d386eb6bd95dcd85badccd21036b4
Any ideas about what - the server returned Access-Accept?? Is this
not what you wanted? What problem are you trying to solve?
That my VPN session still doesn't establish. I get back that the user
can't be authenticated.
What are you using as the NAS? Did you check the documentation to see
will most appreciate your expert opinion.
Post debug output!
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Have you looked here: http://networkradius.com/
Even if you aren't able to provide support, I'd be interested in any
suggestions for where to get support from.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi, I'm trying to log request to my Freeradius server from unknown client...
Look in the radius.log file - it is also logged there
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Why is not working ntlm_auth for ms-chap ?
It would be easier to answer your question if you included the debug output for
a rejected request as opposed to just the startup messages..
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I attached the logs for freeradius -X
The logs you attached just show the startup output, not an actual request that
was rejected.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
From what I've read, supplicants can send an EAPOL-Logoff message to
If the requirement is to determine when the user disconnects, isn't this best
handled by accounting data? That is, if the authenticator supports sending
Accounting-Request packets to RADIUS, then when the user disconnects, it
At approximately 08:40 something happens, and a lot of servers are
flagged as dead or zombie.
This could of course have been caused by network problems, but there was
no such problem at this time. Proxying goes over the same interface as
When it fails, is it always at night? If so, could
This limit is around 8K packets in 2.1.x, and will be 64K packets in
2.2.x. So if you're getting 500 packets/s for a home server, 16s after
it goes down, all 8k slots will be used.
I'm not sure if this is feasible and/or easy to implement, but I thought I'd
ask.. As a suggestion, can there
It never occurred to me that the Cisco controllers could be our issue...
Though I have just checked with a colleague and he did try restarting
them after hours yesterday, and it didn't help matters. If you can find
out what setting you changed that would be ideal, but probably best to
email
I am perfectly willing to accept that you may be right and this may be
my issue, I just don't understand how it has suddenly become a problem.
Are you using a Cisco Wireless LAN Controller (WLC)? We had a similar issue
with our Cisco 2112 WLC (EAP conversation stops on the NAS/supplicant
The problem is that although the Access-Request packet is shown as coming
from the correct host,
that host's ip address is not showing up as the NAS-IP-Address for that
request. Instead, it's showing
as 127.0.0.1 as seen below:
I'm wondering what could cause this? Any help is appreciated.
Hmm. I have two sets of authentication I care about, VPN Users, and
Cisco switches. I'd like to be able to control access to each of
those separately (different AD Security Groups, and different shared
keys).
I'm not sure what you mean by different shared keys - can you clarify? Also,
If I want an enduser to be able to connect to the same SSID on multiple AP´s
then I can not use
Called-Station-ID since it also includes information about the mac address
for a specific AP.
So how do I do to be able to authenticate by just using the SSID and not the
mac address for a
Have any idea ? Where can i find the solution ?
When i trying connect freeradius server with wireless over
access point i get this error:
snip
Tue Oct 13 12:00:45 2009 : Debug: rlm_eap_peap: Had sent TLV failure.
User was rejcted rejected earlier in this session.
The error you're
applied (for about 6 weeks now) to two of our FR servers
and haven't seen any issues.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Garber, Neal
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:58 AM
To: 'Marco D'Ettorre'
Subject: RE: MS-CHAP Authentication / Bug 17
Thank you for sharing your experience Marco. At some
Hi Alan,
First, I don't profess to be an eap expert and what follows is based upon my
understanding of how eap and RADIUS work.. I'm also interested to see if
anyone else has any other thoughts..
anyway, in summary, your RADIUS server has to answer to the old clients
and the new clients.
as Alan Dekok said...deploy a new CA in advanced
and then sign server with that new CA and put cert into place.
I read Alan's reply and it's logical (as usual ;-) ).
Perhaps it wasn't stated because it was intuitively obvious, but the only thing
I would add is that when the new CA cert is
Source code patched.
Thanks..
The redundant sections work just fine
for normal queries to radcheck radreply. If you're doing %{...},
then the redundant sections don't apply.
Ah, now I understand. I abandoned redundant and used if/elsif instead in my
dynamic_client virtual server:
if
I've been running 2.1.6 in Production with the patch from Bug 17, for a month,
and everything has been working fine. As a reminder, this patch corrects a bug
in MS-CHAP with the calculation of the MS-CHAPv1 challenge passed to ntlm_auth.
It causes inappropriate Logon Failure errors, in
Alan, Thank you for taking the time to review the patch and for your feedback.
has a look at this but it's only of interest for classic MS-CHAP
activity rather than MSCHAPv2 in PEAP or TTLS - correct?
(in this case we wouldnt use this function or be able to test
this at our site...but
hmm, okay - I'll only be able to introduce core systrems
with this patch in place after 2nd October - we currently
have a change freeze on main systems until then
That's fabulous. Thanks for your time and willingness to test.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
google search for 'define:delimeter'
Did you mean: define:delimiter Top 2 results shown :-)
You are clearly correct given the root of the word delimiter is delimit
(not delimet) :-)
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Did you create an alias in modules/perl that uses this script for authorize?
Did you add the alias name to the authorize section of your default server?
What return value are you using in the script (RLM_UPDATED)?
-Original Message-
From:
Does it apply cleanly to the current git head?
I created it about 2 weeks ago against the then current git head. It changes
rlm_eap_mschapv2.c, rlm_mschap.c radius.h. I don't believe any of these have
changed in the past 2 weeks, so it should still apply cleanly.
I've been running with it
It won't make 2.1.8. Please submit a bug report and attach the patch.
My preference for the patch is to split it into 2-3 pieces.
Bug # 17 created with separate attachments for each file changed.
Messing with functionality in the MSCHAP module is a bit
worrisome, as it's pretty core to a
I have been asked it it possible to run two SSIDs on our wireless,
lets call them A and B that authorise against a FreeRADIUS server
running as two virtual servers radiusA and radiusB.
I have two EAP instances for the purpose of serving 2 different certificates;
so, what you want to do is
Build it, install it, and see if there are issues.
On FreeBSD 7.2 with libtool 2.2.6a:
- Built
- Installed
- Tested EAP-PEAP/MSCHAPv2, rlm_perl with no issues so far
No LD_PRELOAD needed for libperl.so with libtool 2.2.6.
Do you think the MS-CHAP related patch I submitted will make 2.1.8?
Of Anton Brinyov
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 6:17 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: rlm_perl / libtool / libltdl problem
Hi,
It means, there isn't solution for this problem now?
Thanks,
Anton
2009/8/18 Garber, Neal neal.gar...@energyeast.com:
Did I mention that I hate libtool
I've been playing around with conf/module files trying to strip the
DOMAIN out of my login request - but no luck!
Have you tried with_ntdomain_hack = yes in the mschap module config?
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Yup, that line is there. Much of the doc online is WAY out of date, so I'm
wondering if by actually RTFM first I broke something?
Ok. This may sound crazy and it may not be your problem, but, I thought I'd
mention it anyway.. Look at the samAccountName attribute in A/D for a user
that is
Did I mention that I hate libtool and libltdl? They're close to
*causing* more problems than they solve.
Yes, on several occasions that I recall :) I share your sentiments...
I actually started removing libltdl a while ago. See
src/main/modules.c. Look for WITHOUT_LIBLTDL. I'll bet that
I haven't had much sleep the past few days and just wanted another set of eyes
on an issue I'm having. Also, I won't be able to do more testing until
tomorrow (user/equip. unavailable) and wanted to try to fix it before then.
I'm running FR 2.1.6 with patches to rlm_mschap rlm_eap_mschapv2 to
I tried to use aythentication via Active Directory domain.
FreeRadius 2.1.6 return error:
Try removing the single double quote () just before the last right curly brace
(}) at the bottom of the mschap file
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I've had FR 2.1.6 running on a FreeBSD 7.2 test server for some time now. When
I applied the rlm_mschap / rlm_eap_mschap patch I worked on over the weekend
(which is working great btw - I will upload it shortly), I now get the
following error on FR startup:
Can't load
I will now proceed to create a patch.
The MS-CHAP2-Response attribute created by rlm_eap_mschapv2 does not include
the Name field from the MS-CHAP response packet (as I suspected). I thought
the cleanest way to pass the Name field was to create another attribute in
rlm_eap_mschapv2 before it
BTW, if I should be sending these type of messages to the devel list,
please let me know.
I would suggest that should be the case :-)
Uh, sorry about that. I rarely see anything on that list so I thought maybe it
was no longer in use.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
I rarely see anything on that list
Ugh. I guess I would have if I looked at the sender more closely..
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Depends on the NAS. But yeah, doing this breaks things. The best thing you
can do is log the error in the post-auth section.
In V1 of FR, the rlm_mschap module used to create a Module-Failure-Message
request attribute containing the output of ntlm_auth, if ntlm_auth failed
(rlm_ldap does
I realize that this issue has been brought up many times in the past. However,
I believe I have new information that I haven't seen reported before..
I'm having a problem with Windows XP supplicant authenticating to FR with
PEAP/MSCHAPv2 where authentication fails sometimes depending upon
Well... that's a good reason to make sure we do it right. Any day
where we can replace another RADIUS server with FreeRADIUS is a good day.
My feelings exactly :)
I suspect that it will. The mschap module should also pass the Name
field when calling ntlm_auth, too. And maybe print a
radiusd.conf[723] Failed to link to module 'rlm_mschap_co1': Shared object
rlm_mschap_co1.so not found, required by radiusd
radiusd.conf[1949] Unknown module mschap_co1.
radiusd.conf[1949] Failed to parse mschap_co1 entry.
Did you create 3 instances of mschap using aliases like below?
I know how to patch. I was just trying to find out what was the error.
Igor: I hope you weren't offended by my assumption - I wasn't sure, based upon
your comment, and I was just trying to help. If I offended you, I apologize.
By the way, out of curiosity, did the patch work for you on 2.1.7
I didn't try it yet and i am not very good in C. Error that I and Neal
had is something regarding OS or...? I don't see anyone else having this
problem except me and Neal.
The error is in rlm_perl and appears related to thread data management, not the
O/S and not perl (I run FreeBSD and you
Do you have any ideas about getting chilispot to work with users who
are retrieved from AD via winbind and ntlm_auth
I don't know Chilispot, but if it can pass a cleartext password, then you can
use ntlm_auth in a script to do the authentication. For other devices that
send an A/D user and a
Boian,
SUCCESS! Thank you , thank you, thank you! I applied the patch to my test
2.1.6 system and it eliminated the Seg Fault and all of the strange behaviour.
My perl scripts now function as they do in Production. I am extremely grateful
for the time you spent debugging this issue and
freeradius 2.1.1-6 crashes in a few minutes and
shows this error Error: rlm_eap: Failed to store handler.
There is documentation that describes what to do if FreeRadius crashes. Look
in the file doc/bugs in the distribution and it gives specific instructions for
using gdb to produce
I've been debating sending a similar message to the list as well. I am also
experiencing the same problem with 2.1.6 (undefined subroutines that *clearly*
exist in the script) and Seg Faults. I have reinstalled perl and then
reinstalled FreeRadius to see if I can work around the issue with no
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
