Title: RE: Decent docs
I still like Mark Constables Wiki idea.
Don't you believe it'll work, Alan?
I never said that. I said if Mark sets up a Wiki site, and people find it useful, then it can be made the official FreeRADIUS Wiki site.
Ahh, must have missed that one.
Are you still
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:44, Serge Maandag wrote:
Are you still planning to set it up, Mark?
Yes, here we go... all I've done so far is cut up
doc/README into a few sections just to get some kind
of feel for how this kind of interface can work. Any
additipns and suggestions welcome... just
Serge Maandag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still like Mark Constables Wiki idea.
Don't you believe it'll work, Alan?
I never said that. I said if Mark sets up a Wiki site, and people
find it useful, then it can be made the official FreeRADIUS Wiki site.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Mark Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that is not likely to happen (huge job) then at least
accepting snippets of changes and additions that anyone
might want to contribute and coordinating their inclusion
into current docs is a more likely procedure.
That requires time, and someone
At 10:08 AM 11/28/2001 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that is not likely to happen (huge job) then at least
accepting snippets of changes and additions that anyone
might want to contribute and coordinating their inclusion
into current docs is a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this round of emails might alert a capable someone to the task
of extending the manual properly in full DocBook format.
I'm willing to give you CVS commit access if you're willing to
At 09:21 AM 11/28/2001 -0800, Chad Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:31:51AM -0600, Chris Parker wrote:
On the subject of manuals...
I'm taking what Chad Miller started in docbook format, converted to
HTML and integrating the current 'doc/*' contents.
Ah! Something that I forgot
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:39:05AM -0600, Chris Parker wrote:
...
I dislike having to install additional things just to read a manual page,
or to edit it. I'm just lazy I guess. :)
The whole object of SGML and DocBook is to allow one to maintain a single
source from which one can produce html,
At 10:35 AM 11/28/2001 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:39:05AM -0600, Chris Parker wrote:
...
I dislike having to install additional things just to read a manual page,
or to edit it. I'm just lazy I guess. :)
The whole object of SGML and DocBook is to allow one to
Hi, Chris.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:42:02PM -0600, Chris Parker wrote:
However, in order to use it, I have to learn a whole new markup language.
Irony of ironies, the documentation for JADE ( the editor recommended
on the docbook site ) sucks.
Ugh. That site must really suck, if it led
Mark Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My naive expectation is that when people try to configure servers,
they *read* the configuration files, in order to make any necessary
local changes.
That's assuming a naive user knows enough about realms
to know to read something in the doc/
11 matches
Mail list logo
