Hi Doug
My apologies for the delay - I just returned from vacation.
Ok, so when I take a volumetric spam created using minc tools and create an
overlay from it using mri_vol2surf, the min and max seems to be between 1
and 255. I am wondering if there is any where to change this into a %? When
I
Trisanna, has this issue been resolved?
doug
On 06/30/2016 01:26 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
> Hi Bruce
>
> here is the output of my mri_vol2surf for a volumetric spam created in
> minc tools. When I then overlay this result in Freeview, it displays a
> Min of 127 and a Max of 255.
>
>
Hi Trisanna
what does mri_info show about spam_for_label_id_4_blur_minc1.mnc? You said
it has the range of values in [0,100]? Or [0,1]? I'm not sure why
mri_vol2surf would modify the values - this might have to wait for Doug to
get back
Bruce
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Trisanna
Sprung-Much
Hi Bruce
here is the output of my mri_vol2surf for a volumetric spam created in minc
tools. When I then overlay this result in Freeview, it displays a Min of
127 and a Max of 255.
trisanna@kaplan:~$ mri_vol2surf --mov
Hi Bruce
I simply use
mri_vol2surf --mov spam.mnc --output overlayspam.mgz --regheader subject
--hemi lh --surf pial
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated Program in Neuroscience
Psychology
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
how do you create the overlay?
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Trisanna Sprung-Much
wrote:
Hi Bruce
To create the spam I used minctools:
mincaverage input.mnc output.mnc
I blurred the spam using
mincblur input.mnc output.mnc -fwhm 3
When I open the spams using minc software, the % shown is from
Hi Bruce
To create the spam I used minctools:
mincaverage input.mnc output.mnc
I blurred the spam using
mincblur input.mnc output.mnc -fwhm 3
When I open the spams using minc software, the % shown is from about 10-40%
(i.e. the max overlap). For some reason when I create an overlay from
Hi Trisanna
what commands did you use to generate the volumetric probability map?
Bruce
On
Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
Hi Bruce
So, when I take a probability map formed using linear volumetric
registration with minc tools and saved as .mnc and convert it to an
Hi Trisanna
we need more information if you want us to help you. What does "very odd
mean"? If you do it in .mgz do you get a different answer than in .mnc?
If so, why not just compute them in .mgz and convert to .mnc at the end?
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Trisanna Sprung-Much
any ideas?
Thanks!
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated Program in Neuroscience
Psychology
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much <
trisanna.sprung-m...@mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> thanks Bruce - I had found that option for my fsaverage maps and it worked.
>
thanks Bruce - I had found that option for my fsaverage maps and it worked.
What about if I am importing probability maps formed as .mnc and creating
overlays from them? The percentages seem to be very odd for min and max
threshold.
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated
Hi Trisanna
if you are using mri_average you can give it -p as the first argument and
it will compute a percent at the end
Bruce
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Trisanna
Sprung-Much wrote:
Hi Bruce
Is there is a way to set the probability of an overlay between 0 and 1?
Would this have to be done
Hi Bruce
Is there is a way to set the probability of an overlay between 0 and 1?
Would this have to be done when creating the overlay using mri_vol2surf?
thanks
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated Program in Neuroscience
Psychology
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Bruce
Hi Trisanna
the binaries that take mandatory command-line arguments (i.e. without a --
or - in front of them) require all options to be given before the mandatory
arguments
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Trisanna Sprung-Much
wrote:
thanks, Bruce. Yes in the end through trial and
thanks, Bruce. Yes in the end through trial and error I tried "mri_average
-noconform input output" and it worked. I was surprised that I had to put
the -noconform first as normally one can put the argument anywhere in the
command.
Best
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated
yes, your last file on the command line should be the output file (the
average)
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
As a follow-up, here is the mri_info for one of my overlays in the folder
and the output file that mri_average seems to create (if I don't specify an
try it with the noconform as the first argument. I think it will ignore it
at the end
Hi Dr. Fischl
I ran the following mri_average and consistently get this message. It seems
to be trying to read my output as one of the input volumes. If I don't
specify an output it re-writes my last file
As a follow-up, here is the mri_info for one of my overlays in the folder
and the output file that mri_average seems to create (if I don't specify an
output and it re-writes my last file). The dimensions are off:
Any ideas?
Trisanna
Tg
Hi Dr. Fischl
I ran the following mri_average and consistently get this message. It seems
to be trying to read my output as one of the input volumes. If I don't
specify an output it re-writes my last file in the input folder and when I
try to open this it doesn't work at all.
What exactly does
no problem.
Bruce
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
thanks Dr. Fischl - I think sometimes my emails don't get sent out on the
first try and so I resend - don't mean to spam everyone.
Don't know how I missed the mri_average option - I think I need vacation
too.
thanks and have a
thanks Dr. Fischl - I think sometimes my emails don't get sent out on the
first try and so I resend - don't mean to spam everyone.
Don't know how I missed the mri_average option - I think I need vacation
too.
thanks and have a lovely Sunday!
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Hi Trisanna
Doug is on vacation and his response time is likely to be pretty slow. If
any emails go unanswered you should repost them in a week or two.
As for this, if you overlays are mapped to fsaverage you can just use
mri_average to average them.
cheers
Bruce
On Sun, 19
Jun 2016,
Hi Doug
So all of my sulci for each subject have been registered to fsaverage using
mri_surf2surf. I am now wondering how I could create an average of a sulcus
using these overlays - I understand that mris_make_average_surface is an
option but I cannot seem to find whether this works for overlays
worked beautifully. Thank you!
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated Program in Neuroscience
Psychology
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
> Try surf2surf with --mapmethod nnf
>
> On 06/15/2016 04:25 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
> >
Try surf2surf with --mapmethod nnf
On 06/15/2016 04:25 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
> Hi Doug - yes they do actually, I was quite pleased. I did some trials
> with other subjects and the mri_vol2surf all looks good. Very similar
> to what I had in our in-house software.
>
> Would things be
Hi Doug - yes they do actually, I was quite pleased. I did some trials with
other subjects and the mri_vol2surf all looks good. Very similar to what I
had in our in-house software.
Would things be better if I were to isolate each sulcus as a .label and
then try the mri_label2label? Someone
The problem is probably that the vol2surf command did not properly
sample the labels onto the surface. Do the labels on subject 00350
surfaces look ok?
On 06/15/2016 04:00 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
> thanks Dr. Fischl
>
> So the command seems to have worked! I have copied what ran in my
Hi Trisanna
you would only use those options of if you were transforming a surface
Bruce
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
thanks Dr. Fischl
I assume that for surface overlays one cannot specify --sval-xyz and --tval-xyz
or the command will treat the input as a surface
thanks Dr. Fischl
I assume that for surface overlays one cannot specify --sval-xyz and
--tval-xyz or the command will treat the input as a surface itself?
best
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated Program in Neuroscience
Psychology
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:11 AM,
Hi Trisanna
you don't need to inflate the overlays. They can just use the existing
surface-based (sphere.reg) registration.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016,
Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:
Hi there
So I have sulcal labels from another software (.mnc format) from which I am
trying to
30 matches
Mail list logo