External Email - Use Caution
I don't know. I don't think anyone has done a study on it. You'd have to
label the pil de passages in a bunch of subjects and see if the pattern
holds.
On 7/4/2023 7:05 AM, Federica Santacroce wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hello
External Email - Use Caution
Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
I used the sulcal depth maps superimposed on inflated images (setting
colour depth =< 0) to define the morphological sulcal pattern (continuous
vs. interrupted). Is this method useful for detecting pli de passage that
may
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,
I want to obtain the gyral height and the sulcal depth for every region of
the aparc atlas. I know that in the file lh.sulc the positive values are
the depth of the sulcus and the negative one are the height of the gyrus.
How can I obtain
Hi,
I studied the FreeSurfer code for MRISinflateBrain and came across a
discrepancy in how the sulcal depth is computed. This explains why the values
are much smaller than expected.
My question @Bruce is if this is intentional or (as the function names below
indicate) possibly a bug in the
Hi Andreas
I just took a look at the code and it seems you are correct! Thanks for
catching this. I'll change the code base now and the fix will be in v6.
Bruce
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Andreas
Schuh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I studied the FreeSurfer code for MRISinflateBrain and came across a
>
Hi Bruce,
The units are not standardized because the standard deviation across the
surface does not equal 1.
>From line 227 in mris_inflate.c it says that the sulc file is demeaned before
>it is written out:
MRISzeroMeanCurvature(mris) ; /* make sulc zero mean */
However I am still
Hi Simon
I just took a look at the code and I believe that we make it 0 median
(not mean) and unit standard deviation. The curvatures can get quite large
in regions where the vertex spacing is small and the median is robust to
this.
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Simon Vandekar wrote:
>
Hi Bruce,
I think that unnormalized sulcal depth would be useful. However, I am also
curious what the units are in the standard output, because they appear to not
be z-score standardized in each hemisphere.
Thanks again,
Simon
>H I Simon
>Do you need the unnormalized sulc? It would be pretty
Hi Bruce,
I chose a random subject from the ADNI dataset and computed the mean and
variance for the left and right hemispheres separately. It looks like the mean
is close to 0, however the variance is not 1. Do you think it is possible that
the surfaces are demeaned, but the units are still
H I Simon
Do you need the unnormalized sulc? It would be pretty easy to put something in
to generate it
Bruce
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Simon Vandekar wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I chose a random subject from the ADNI dataset and computed the mean and
> variance
Hi Simon
they are originally mm, but I believe we z-score normalize them so that
the sulc file is 0 mean and unit variance.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Simon
Vandekar wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I am reading the manuscript "Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation,
>
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I am reading the manuscript "Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation,
Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System" by Fischl, Sereno, and Dale
(1999) where the estimation of sulcal depth is described on page 199, however
from the description I am still
Hi Freesurfer experts,
I did thickness group analysis in pts and healthy subject groups in qdec
(age corrected( and got thicker cortex in left insula and thinner precentral
gyrus bilaterally that survived FDR 0.01
Surface area and curvature analysis found no difference. However, sulcal
depth
Hello everyone,
I'm working on a group analysis of cortical thickness, surface area, curvature
and sulcal depth with FreeSurfer 5.3. However I'm in trouble concerning the
interpretation or the meaning of my results, especially concerning curvature
and sulcal depth.
I understood that curvature
Hi Damien,
yes, that's correct. The sulc is the integrated dot product between the
movement vector and the surface normal, so things that move consistently
outwards (like sulci) will be positive, and gyri will be negative.
cheers
Bruce
On Sat,
21 Sep 2013, Damien MARIE wrote:
Hello
sorry, it fell through the cracks. Please feel free to resend if I don't
get back in a reasonable amount of time... Try this command instead
mri_segstats --annot subjectname lh aparc --sum lh.sulc.sum --i surf/lh.sulc
the output will be lh.sulc.sum
doug
On 08/16/2012 07:02 PM, Hugh Pemberton
Hi Hugh, you can run mris_anatomical_stats passing it the sulc file as
input. This will give you averages within aparc. I'm not sure what you
mean by measuring cortical folding. What measure would you accept?
There's the sulcal depth and then there's curvature (?h.curv). There are
two types of
HI Doug,
I tried the mris_anatomical_stats and may well be doing it wrong but got
this as the result:
hughp@naoshi-WS:~/freesurfer/subjects$ mris_anatomical_stats -a
ABM/surf/lh.sulc -b ABM lh
computing statistics for each annotation in ABM/surf/lh.sulc.
reading volume
Is there a way to extract sulcal depth statistics for a group of subjects using
a function like aparcstats2table for mean curve, thickness, volume, etc.?
Thanks,
Heather
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hello,
How can I calculate the sulcal depth and the sulcal width for each hemisphere
and for specific ROIs?
Thanks and regards, Kelly
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
This paper may help you:http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/reprint/25/34/7840.pdf
http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/reprint/25/34/7840.pdfAnd also this threads:
http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2005-December/002092.html
Is there any way of measuring sulcal depth with FreeSurfer?
Or is sulcal depth simply measured by the positive values in ?h.sulc - i.e.
negative values are 'gyral heights' and positive values are 'sulcal depths'?
If so is it possible to calculate these values for certain parcellated
regions such
Hi Christine,
yes that is essentially what is measure in ?h.sulc - the integrated signed
dot product of the movement vectors during inflation with the surface
normal (so outward movement in sulci is positive). Certainly you can
specify sulc in mris_anatomical_stats, although I can't remember
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 23/12/2005 10:33 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: Bruce Fischl; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
you might be able to use mri_segstats. Give it the thickness file as --in,
and use the sulc as the mask and use
Hi all,
From my understanding, ?h.sulc can be used to measure sulcal depth.
I'm wandering if it is possible to use this to get the depth of a sulcus within
an ROI, and if so, how you would extract the relevant measures, i.e.., would it
be obtainable through mris_anatomical_stats?
Thanks,
Alex
not all that easily, although I guess we could write out something from
mris_inflate that has the units of mm.
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
From my understanding, ?h.sulc can be used to measure sulcal depth.
I'm wandering if it is possible to use this to get the
@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
not all that easily, although I guess we could write out something from
mris_inflate that has the units of mm.
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
From my understanding, ?h.sulc can be used to measure sulcal depth.
I'm
, 2005 5:37 PM
To: Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS) [F]
Cc: Fornito, Alexander; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
you mean in a parcellation unit? It's whatever the parcellation unit is
defined to be.
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS) [F]
wrote
Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 23/12/2005 9:30 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
not all that easily, although I guess we could write out something from
mris_inflate that has the units of mm
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
not all that easily, although I guess we could write out something from
mris_inflate that has the units of mm.
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
From my understanding, ?h.sulc can be used to measure sulcal depth.
I'm wandering
@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
not all that easily, although I guess we could write out something from
mris_inflate that has the units of mm.
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Hi all,
From my understanding, ?h.sulc can be used to measure sulcal depth
of Melbourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 23/12/2005 10:36 AM
To: Fornito, Alexander
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
sure, just sum them separately. Would be easy to do in matlab (we did
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Sulcal depth
I think they are volume RAS coords, with 0,0,0 at the center of the volume.
I think we distribute a read_label.m or load_label.m that can read it into
matlab.
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Fornito, Alexander wrote:
Famous last words, but seems simple enough
33 matches
Mail list logo