Hi David,
Thanks for pointing me at the Octave code. I'll have to do some
reading as I'm pretty sure my implementation is buggy.
Regarding, the 700 bit/s mode, I do hope there will be no major change
in the library version, as we have to use the distribution packaging,
on stable.
Thanks,
Adrian
Hi Adrian,
There is Octave and C code for the mFSK modem we have developed in
codec2-dev, that we have tested against the ideal FSK performance
curves. Not sure I'd call it matched filter, but take a look at the code.
It's important to check your modem implementation against theory at a
If implemented correctly, 4FSK gets you 3dB over 2FSK on an AWGN
channel. The FSKs can use class C PAs.
For DRM/C4FSK they _are_ bandwidth constrained due to the high bit rate
of AMBE/standards (which is black box with a bit rate so they have no
choice over). I presume this is the reason for
There was some neat AM designs a couple of years ago, but I think they
all petered out last year. Narrow-band FM still remains king on VHF
and up.
I play around a little bit with an used FT-857d, but that's a Cadillac
radio, and I use it mostly on HF.
I think that's the problem with the current
Hi David,
Thanks very much for the tips! Would you suggest that the matched
filter approach is better for 4FSK as well? I am using it for 2FSK and
it works well, it's just that being lazy I wanted to avoid too much
complexity in the code for the 4FSK variant.
Regarding PSK: I have several things
On 10/5/17, Steve wrote:
> You might also do your testing in a more remote spot. The use of ISM
> in the city is probably pretty high, and interference would be an
> issue. It might not break the squelch (spread spectrum, etc), but the
> bits would be corrupted.
>
> I see
Hi David,
Thanks for the answer! I have just simulated a 2FSK modem on AWGN
channel, but this time without using FM demodulation. It performs just
like you said, ~2 dB worse than QPSK (at 5% frames dropped). This
means that the FM demodulator I used for 2400A must be introducing
some symbol
You might also do your testing in a more remote spot. The use of ISM
in the city is probably pretty high, and interference would be an
issue. It might not break the squelch (spread spectrum, etc), but the
bits would be corrupted.
I see a lot of users on that band, with just a junkbox antenna and