sg == seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FDF What about running eclipse in twm?
sg Can you try this?
I'm sorry I thought I mentioned that in my last posting.
Yes, I tried it in twm and it worked fine.
--
Jake Colman
Sr. Applications Developer
Principia Partners LLC
FDF == Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FDF Hi!
FDF You asked:
Am I the only FVWM + Eclipse user out here?
FDF No.
FDF I'm using eclipse 3.1.2 with fvwm 2.5.16 and Xorg 7.0.0 on an Athlon
FDF 550 with 448 MB of ram. It's quite a bit sluggish and I have
On 7/24/06, Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FDF == Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FDF Hi!
FDF You asked:
Am I the only FVWM + Eclipse user out here?
FDF No.
FDF I'm using eclipse 3.1.2 with fvwm 2.5.16 and Xorg 7.0.0 on an Athlon
FDF 550 with
sg == seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sg On 7/18/06, Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several weeks ago I posed a problem with the display performance of
Eclipse
when using FVWM 2.5.7. A reasonable poster suggested that I should at
least
upgrade to a newer
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:46:06AM -0400, Jake Colman wrote:
It all works fine when using CDE, so it's not an X problem.
Am I the only FVWM + Eclipse user out here?
No you're not. Since I find 'vim' good enough for my needs, that's what
I use. I've used Eclipse under FVWM though (2.5.14
Hi!
You asked:
Am I the only FVWM + Eclipse user out here?
No.
I'm using eclipse 3.1.2 with fvwm 2.5.16 and Xorg 7.0.0 on an Athlon
550 with 448 MB of ram. It's quite a bit sluggish and I have to take
care not to run too many other memory- or cpu-hungry applications at
the same time (e.g.
Several weeks ago I posed a problem with the display performance of Eclipse
when using FVWM 2.5.7. A reasonable poster suggested that I should at least
upgrade to a newer version. I jave just installed v2.5.16 and Eclipse
performance now seems reasonable and roughly equivalent to using it under
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:51:27AM -0400, Jake Colman wrote:
Several weeks ago I posed a problem with the display performance of
Eclipse when using FVWM 2.5.7. A reasonable poster suggested that I
should at least upgrade to a newer version. I jave just installed
v2.5.16 and Eclipse
Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several weeks ago I posed a problem with the display performance of Eclipse
when using FVWM 2.5.7. A reasonable poster suggested that I should at least
upgrade to a newer version. I jave just installed v2.5.16 and Eclipse
performance now seems
TA == Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TA On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:51:27AM -0400, Jake Colman wrote:
Several weeks ago I posed a problem with the display performance of
Eclipse when using FVWM 2.5.7. A reasonable poster suggested that I
should at least upgrade to a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:31:13AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Review the fvwm man page for saveunder and backingstore.
I've never had any luck with using these, and found FVWM to crash a lot
when they were enabled. I also fail to see how that would help, when
purportedly, the issue isn't happening
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:31:13AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
Review the fvwm man page for saveunder and backingstore.
I've never had any luck with using these, and found FVWM to crash a lot
when they were enabled. I also fail to see how that would help,
On 7/18/06, Jake Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several weeks ago I posed a problem with the display performance of Eclipse
when using FVWM 2.5.7. A reasonable poster suggested that I should at least
upgrade to a newer version. I jave just installed v2.5.16 and Eclipse
performance now seems
13 matches
Mail list logo
