You might check out Shiira, which was recommended in a recent LEM
article. It's absolutely fantastic on older macs, and lacks the
problems that annoy me (memory leaks specifically) about Safari and
Firefox. It's also wicked fast (I love using that term!!)
Ben
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:47:03AM
At 10:13 AM -0400 6/20/2009, iJohn wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Dandantear...@gmail.com wrote:
What inputmanagers, plug-ins, etc have you installed?
Does the problem still occur when you eliminate them?
bash-3.2# ls -l /Library/InputManagers
drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 136 May
On 6/19/09 11:00 AM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
Broadcast into the ether:
Nope, it means that there's a bug affecting Leo users only...
--
Bruce Johnson
Yep. And I recommend using Firefox instead of Safari anyway. Security,
stability and a host of other reasons.
-- Kyle
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Dandantear...@gmail.com wrote:
What inputmanagers, plug-ins, etc have you installed?
Does the problem still occur when you eliminate them?
Does this help? If you see something you think is worth taking the
time to try omitting I might try it. But I'm not
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Dandantear...@gmail.com wrote:
Think isn't good enough. Be specific. Try it. You're talking about
a GMail function failing on two totally different platforms
(Safari/WebKit vs Firefox/Gecko), and to be frank, that just doesn't
make sense.
I'm sorry that
On Jun 18, 2009, at 10:41 PM, insightinmind wrote:
i don't see it with my Tiger Software update ...
This is a strange Apple update. It's Leopard only. Safari 4.0.1 is the
official Leopard version, while the official Tiger version is still
4.0. I hope this doesn't mean that Apple is
On Jun 19, 2009, at 12:27 AM, Kris Tilford wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 10:41 PM, insightinmind wrote:
i don't see it with my Tiger Software update ...
This is a strange Apple update. It's Leopard only. Safari 4.0.1 is the
official Leopard version, while the official Tiger version is still
At 8:35 PM -0700 6/18/2009, irrational john wrote:
A Safari Version 4.0.1 update is now available.
Leopard only.
was just nibbling away at my gmail inbox and once again cursing how
these days only the only the bottom delete button works. Ever
since I installed the non-beta Safari 4.0, the top
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dandantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 8:35 PM -0700 6/18/2009, irrational john wrote:
Elaborate please - exactly what isn't working? I've played with just
about everything in the GMail web interface and it seems to work
quite well with Safari 4.0.
When I use
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:35 PM, iJohnzjboyguard-ggro...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dandantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 8:35 PM -0700 6/18/2009, irrational john wrote:
Elaborate please - exactly what isn't working? I've played with just
about everything in the GMail web
At 2:35 PM -0400 6/19/2009, iJohn wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dandantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 8:35 PM -0700 6/18/2009, irrational john wrote:
Elaborate please - exactly what isn't working? I've played with just
about everything in the GMail web interface and it seems to work
For all of you who had fun when installing Safari 4.0, good news! You
can do it again!
A Safari Version 4.0.1 update is now available.
I don't know how long it's been out there. I was just nibbling away
at my gmail inbox and once again cursing how these days only the only
the bottom delete
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:35 PM, irrational john wrote:
A Safari Version 4.0.1 update is now available.
...
-irrational john
i don't see it with my Tiger Software update ...
Bill Connelly
artsite: http://mysite.verizon.net/moonstoneartstudio
myspace:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:41 PM, insightinmindbillycarm...@verizon.net wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:35 PM, irrational john wrote:
A Safari Version 4.0.1 update is now available.
i don't see it with my Tiger Software update ...
My apologies ... I'm not sure if it IS available for Tiger yet.
At 1:53 AM -0300 6/15/2009, MaGioZal wrote:
On 6/14/09 1:47 PM, tonycd at tonyl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Do I remember correctly that Safari 4 and Camino use a similar
underlying engine?
No... Camino uses the same engine as Firefox, but its interface and some
resources are Cocoa-based.
A question for our illuminati:
Do I remember correctly that Safari 4 and Camino use a similar
underlying engine?
And if so, does that mean they are roughly comparable in speed and
overall performance?
(Vested interest: I'm not anxious to ditch Camino. I'm used to it, and
I like the idea of
On Jun 14, 2009, at 12:47 PM, tonycd wrote:
A question for our illuminati:
Do I remember correctly that Safari 4 and Camino use a similar
underlying engine?
And if so, does that mean they are roughly comparable in speed and
overall performance?
(Vested interest: I'm not anxious to
On 6/14/09 1:47 PM, tonycd at tonyl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Do I remember correctly that Safari 4 and Camino use a similar
underlying engine?
No... Camino uses the same engine as Firefox, but its interface and some
resources are Cocoa-based. Safari uses the engine of Linux browser
Konqueror.
At 9:03 PM -0500 6/12/2009, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
Is there any way to get the progress bar back in lieu of the rotating wheel?
No. The preferences to change this (set with a raw defaults
command), that were in the beta, have been removed in this final
build.
I recommend using Safari's
At 10:37 PM -0700 6/12/2009, Ernest L. Gunerius wrote:
[HTML removed]
Take a look at:
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/05/23/1747241/
Cache spew isn't relevant to changing the Loading indicator.
This cache mess bugs me. I don't understand why Apple would violate
their own guidelines, by
Howdy,
Well, it is not exactly what George asked for. But, if you like the
progress bar, use Firefox and install the fission add-in. I almost
always add that add-in, because I like the Safari style progress bar.
Good day,
Ralph
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 09:18 -0400, Dan wrote:
At 9:03 PM -0500
At 12:09 PM -0500 6/13/2009, Ralph Green wrote:
Well, it is not exactly what George asked for. But, if you like the
progress bar, use Firefox and install the fission add-in. I almost
always add that add-in, because I like the Safari style progress bar.
ug. Firefox is s slow compared to
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 12:09 PM -0500 6/13/2009, Ralph Green wrote:
Well, it is not exactly what George asked for. But, if you like the
progress bar, use Firefox and install the fission add-in. I almost
always add that add-in, because I like the
On Jun 13, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Dan wrote:
At 12:09 PM -0500 6/13/2009, Ralph Green wrote:
Well, it is not exactly what George asked for. But, if you like the
progress bar, use Firefox and install the fission add-in. I almost
always add that add-in, because I like the Safari style progress
On Jun 13, 1:47 pm, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
ug. Firefox is s slow compared to Safari 4!
My experience is that Firefox 3 is much slower in OS X than it is in
Windows. In Windows Firefox is still my preferred browser. I don't
know what about its implementation might slow Firefox down
On 6/13/09 3:09 PM, insightinmind at billycarm...@verizon.net wrote:
I noticed that, too.
And the Firefox Mac interace eats up a sizeable part of display real estate,
too, mainly if you're in 1024x768.
--
MaGioZal.
http://fotolog.com/_magiozal/
Anyone else having the same problem I'm having? Tiger keeps giving me
the (seemingly) same Safari updater every time I boot, every day for
about the last 2 weeks. 19.1 MB in size, if memory (mine, not my
Quicksilver's) serves. I run it, but it keeps coming back anyway.
--Tony
On Jun 10, 2009, at 4:37 PM, tonycd wrote:
Anyone else having the same problem I'm having? Tiger keeps giving me
the (seemingly) same Safari updater every time I boot, every day for
about the last 2 weeks. 19.1 MB in size, if memory (mine, not my
Quicksilver's) serves. I run it, but it keeps
I think I'm going to stick with Firefox for the time being, and wait
for the inevitable updates to Safari 4.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs -
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 4:37 PM, tonycd wrote:
Anyone else having the same problem I'm having? Tiger keeps giving me
the (seemingly) same Safari updater every time I boot, every day for
about the last 2 weeks. 19.1 MB in
At 9:49 AM -0400 6/9/2009, Dan wrote:
Some of the interface foibles of Safari 4 Beta have been rolled
back. But the ones that are left seem immutable
hum. Is it just me or is the tabs bar now darker?
Dark background with small black text... VERY difficult to read! :(
- Dan.
--
-
Dan wrote:
At 9:49 AM -0400 6/9/2009, Dan wrote:
Some of the interface foibles of Safari 4 Beta have been rolled
back. But the ones that are left seem immutable
hum. Is it just me or is the tabs bar now darker?
Dark background with small black text... VERY difficult to read! :(
I installed it and I can't even get my firewire drive to boot tiger
now! I'm using my second drive with a backup beforehand. Damn you Apple!
It booted fine before. Now it's hosed.
On Jun 9, 2009, at 12:39 PM, James E. Therrault wrote:
Dan wrote:
At 9:49 AM -0400 6/9/2009, Dan wrote:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:08 PM, Trinette Rani Johnson wrote:
I installed it and I can't even get my firewire drive to boot tiger
now! I'm using my second drive with a backup beforehand. Damn you
Apple!
It booted fine before. Now it's hosed.
It's likely there's no relation between your
Trinette Rani Johnson wrote:
I installed it and I can't even get my firewire drive to boot tiger
now! I'm using my second drive with a backup beforehand. Damn you Apple!
It booted fine before. Now it's hosed.
What I can't understand is why people rush off to get the latest 'n
greates
35 matches
Mail list logo
