Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote: > > --  Original message  -- > Subject: Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth > Date:    Montag 12 Oktober 2009N > From:    "Wallace Adrian D'Alessio" > To:      g3-5-l...@googlegroups.com > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:03

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Nestamicky wrote: > I need to be able to mount ntfs hds on > the mac from other machines and write to them. Are the different machines on the same local network (LAN)? If so, then couldn't you also just R/W share the drive via the network? But if the NTFS drive

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

-- Original message -- Subject: Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth Date:Montag 12 Oktober 2009N From:"Wallace Adrian D'Alessio" To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Nestamicky wrote: > > On 11/10/09 5:49 PM, iJohn wrote: > >> In Leo

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Nestamicky wrote: > > On 11/10/09 5:49 PM, iJohn wrote: >> In Leopard I can access an NTFS formatted drive in read-only mode. > This really is the issue also. I need to be able to mount ntfs hds on > the mac from other machines and write to them. Say, I'm working

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On 11/10/09 2:24 PM, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote: > You will always > run the risk of some situation that leads to the Mac ask to reformat > the drive. > This would be the case even with ntfs-3g installed? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message beca

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On 11/10/09 5:49 PM, iJohn wrote: > In Leopard I can access an NTFS formatted drive in read-only mode. This really is the issue also. I need to be able to mount ntfs hds on the mac from other machines and write to them. Say, I'm working in OSX or Win, I need to be able to send stuff to either ma

Re: Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable?

At 8:26 PM -0400 10/11/2009, iJohn wrote: >Assuming that you are talking about a device which can only be set up >by running software which will only work under Windows, that strikes >me as a tedious and annoying problem, but it could be worked around in >a number of ways. Probably the easiest wou

Re: iTunes artwork problem.

On Oct 11, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Roger Kulp wrote: > I have a lot of stuff in my iTunes I have downloaded from blogs. > Other people's vinyl rips of old stuff long unavailabe.I have taken > pictures of my own copies of some of these record, and would like to > add the pictures from my desktop t

iTunes artwork problem.

I have a lot of stuff in my iTunes I have downloaded from blogs.Other people's   vinyl rips of old stuff long unavailabe.I have taken pictures of my own copies of some of these record,and would like to add the pictures from my desktop to iTunes,but when I click on "get info" for artwork.it will n

RE: USB Hub

I'd add a couple of caveats too. Firstly - make sure you only buy a powered USB2.0 hub that plugs into your 110 or 240v wall socket as well as the USB. A lot of hubs these days don't and when you plug in something like an external drive , the USB port cannot supply enough power on its own for

Re: Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable?

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Dwight Hines wrote: > Researching the use of Powerline adapters for in-home, or even within > business sites, you notice immediately that if you are using a pc instead of > a Macintosh computer, there is a specific software package you can download > to secure you

Re: USB Hub

On 12-10-2009 00:37, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote: > The USB connector is rather small (looks like 5 pins in it) Aha, small <-> normal USB cable. Same price (± US$ 7). > And what will such a card cost me? As said: Here in Amsterdam (NL) around Euro 6 = US$ 8,75 and in the USA prob

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

In Leopard I can access an NTFS formatted drive in read-only mode. The only reason to bother with NTFS-3G is if this feature is not available in the version of OS X you are using or if you want to be able to write to the NTFS formated drive from your Mac. No? In other words, I'd check to see if y

Re: USB Hub

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote: > The USB connector is rather small (looks like 5 pins in it) > And what will such a card cost me? Don't you already have a mini-USB B cable sitting around for use with a cell phone, camera, MP3 player, or whatever? If you want to buy mini

Re: USB Hub

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:30 PM, J.M.P.Hissel wrote: > > On 11-10-2009 23:39, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote: > >> I got the hub sans cord from where I work. > > Aha, understood! > Well, if your Hub has a "usual" USB connection, then you'll find a 1 mtr > cable for around US$ 7 in every

Re: USB Hub

On 11-10-2009 23:39, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote: > I got the hub sans cord from where I work. Aha, understood! Well, if your Hub has a "usual" USB connection, then you'll find a 1 mtr cable for around US$ 7 in every computershop. But don't forget: To use that Hub in USB 2 you'll n

Re: USB Hub

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:50 PM, J.M.P.Hissel wrote: > > On 11-10-2009 21:14, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote: > >> Anyone know what it takes to make this hub work with my Quicksilver? >> Do I need a USB card or will simply plugging it into my G4's USB port work? >> Which is the best opt

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On 12/10/2009, at 7:39 AM, Nestamicky wrote: > I have a rather large HD that's formatted in NTFS and has tons of data > on it that I'd like installed as a secondary drive in my Sawtooth. > Question is: if I pop it in, as secondary, would it need to be > reinitialized with the possibility of loosin

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

On 10/11/09 1:52 AM, Kris Tilford of ktilfo...@cox.net sent > > On Oct 11, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Richard Gerome wrote: > >> I don't know what the problem could be, but I have a question about >> this??? Why would you upgrade to Leopard if Tiger was running so >> great??? I can't find anything t

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

-- Original message -- Subject: Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth Date:Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009N From:"Wallace Adrian D'Alessio" To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Nestamicky wrote: > > I thought I'd run this here quick, as I'm sur

Re: USB Hub

On 11-10-2009 21:14, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote: > Anyone know what it takes to make this hub work with my Quicksilver? > Do I need a USB card or will simply plugging it into my G4's USB port work? > Which is the best option? Also, where can I get just the USB cord for > it? I have

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Nestamicky wrote: > > I thought I'd run this here quick, as I'm sure someone here would have > wanted to do same. > > I have a rather large HD that's formatted in NTFS and has tons of data > on it that I'd like installed as a secondary drive in my Sawtooth. > Ques

Re: Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable?

At 12:30 PM -0600 10/11/2009, Nestamicky wrote: >On 11/10/09 9:58 AM, Dan wrote: >> Keeping your computers secure is YOUR responsibility. If your ISP >> provides you with something fancy, like a NAT router, or a media >> bridge, that's great -- but that's done to conveniently maintain > > rou

USB Hub

Anyone know what it takes to make this hub work with my Quicksilver? Do I need a USB card or will simply plugging it into my G4's USB port work? Which is the best option? Also, where can I get just the USB cord for it? I have one that will work but it is one with one end that is changeable and I p

Re: Firewire 800 external drive

On Oct 11, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Norm Rowe wrote: > I have a Western Digital external drive hooked up with firewire 800 > to my G4 Mac. I used disk utility to format and restore OS 10.5.8 to > this drive. When I open the drive icon all seem OK but when I select > it for the start up drive, anot

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

On 11/10/09 1:10 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote: > You'll find it here: > http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/ > > I have NTFS-3G 2009.4.4 running on my PowerPC Mac and it never let me down so > far. > Thanks so much for this. You have no idea how well you've helped me. Really of great help! Thanks!

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

You'll find it here: http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/ I have NTFS-3G 2009.4.4 running on my PowerPC Mac and it never let me down so far. System requirements are: Mac OS X 10.4 or 10.5 on Intel or PowerPC. Note: there is a 15-day trial version of Tuxera out, but as it already states, it's only

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

At 11:15 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: >The SMTP address is exactly as you specified it: smtp.att.yahoo.com . >What would be the next most likely suspect here? Double check with your ISP that the address "smtp.att.yahoo.com" is still the correct server. If it is, then next we test the conn

Re: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

-- Original message -- Subject: NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth Date:Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009N From:Nestamicky To: "G-Group" > I thought I'd run this here quick, as I'm sure someone here would have > wanted to do same. > > I have a rather large HD that's formatte

NTFS formatted carry to Sawtooth

I thought I'd run this here quick, as I'm sure someone here would have wanted to do same. I have a rather large HD that's formatted in NTFS and has tons of data on it that I'd like installed as a secondary drive in my Sawtooth. Question is: if I pop it in, as secondary, would it need to be re

Re: Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable?

On 11/10/09 9:58 AM, Dan wrote: > Keeping your computers secure is YOUR responsibility. If your ISP > provides you with something fancy, like a NAT router, or a media > bridge, that's great -- but that's done to conveniently maintain > routing integrity, not security. Your home is YOUR responsib

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

Thank you for straightening me out on that, Dan. Thank goodness somebody here knows what they're talking about, since I certainly don't. The SMTP address is exactly as you specified it: smtp.att.yahoo.com . What would be the next most likely suspect here? Thanks again, Tony On Oct 11, 12:55 pm

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

At 10:18 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: >It's "pop.att.yahoo.com", same as it's been for years. The POP server is for *receiving* mail. SMTP is for *sending*. It's the SMTP server you need to check -- smtp.att.yahoo.com - Dan. -- - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth. --~--~

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

It's "pop.att.yahoo.com", same as it's been for years. On Oct 11, 12:07 pm, Dan wrote: > At 9:50 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: > > >On Oct 11, 11:05 am, Dan wrote: > > > At 8:58 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: > > > >Sending of message failed. > >> >The message could not be sent bec

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

At 9:50 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: >On Oct 11, 11:05 am, Dan wrote: > > At 8:58 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: > > >Sending of message failed. >> >The message could not be sent because connecting to SMTP server >> >smtp.att.yahoo failed. The server may be unavailable or is refusin

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

Dan, pardon my ignorance, but where do I look for that? In Thunderbird? In System Prefs? On Oct 11, 11:05 am, Dan wrote: > At 8:58 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: > > >In case this helps, the failure message says: > > >Send Message Error > > >Sending of message failed. > >The message could n

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

I apologize for the repeat posts. They're purely accidental, and I think they happen because I hit return or refresh at the wrong time. Listmom, feel free to delete the repeaters. On Oct 11, 11:05 am, Dan wrote: > At 8:58 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: > > >In case this helps, the failure me

Re: PowerPC speeds and the switch to Intel...

At 7:52 AM -0700 10/11/2009, Linda Hungerford wrote: >On Oct 9, 7:09 pm, Bruce Johnson wrote: >> Apple differs from most intel-based PC's in that Macs do not have a >> BIOS, but instead use Open Firmware and EFI-based configuration. > > Nothing is stopping anyone from making an EFI-based PC.

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

At 8:58 AM -0700 10/11/2009, tonycd wrote: >In case this helps, the failure message says: > >Send Message Error > >Sending of message failed. >The message could not be sent because connecting to SMTP server >smtp.att.yahoo failed. The server may be unavailable or is refusing >SMTP connections. Ple

Re: Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable?

At 3:23 AM -0400 10/11/2009, Dwight Hines wrote: >Researching the use of Powerline adapters for in-home, or even >within business sites, you notice immediately that if you are using >a pc instead of a Macintosh computer, there is a specific software >package you can download to secure your Powe

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

In case this helps, the failure message says: Send Message Error Sending of message failed. The message could not be sent because connecting to SMTP server smtp.att.yahoo failed. The server may be unavailable or is refusing SMTP connections. Please verify that your SMTP server setting is correct

Re: Creeping failure to send emails

In case this helps, the failure message says: Send Message Error Sending of message failed. The message could not be sent because connecting to SMTP server smtp.att.yahoo failed. The server may be unavailable or is refusing SMTP connections. Please verify that your SMTP server setting is correct

Creeping failure to send emails

I have AT&T DSL, connected by wire to a Quicksilver running Tiger and wirelessly via AirPort Graphite to a MacBook running Leopard. Both use Thunderbird for email. In recent days, both machines are having increasing trouble sending emails. At first, you'd fail on the first one or two attempts and

Re: RAM doesn't work

I did try the module in all three slots, yes, and it does have 8 chips on the back as well... Looks like the only way is to buy stuff marked as "for Mac also". Thanks for all the response, and right, I had forgotten about that little Dutch company with their great RAM info. Only, I don't find the

Re: PowerPC speeds and the switch to Intel...

On 11-10-2009 16:52, Linda Hungerford, tallgrassprai...@earthlink.net, wrote: > On Oct 9, 7:09 pm, Bruce Johnson wrote: >> Apple differs from most intel-based PC's in that Macs do not have a   >> BIOS, but instead use Open Firmware and EFI-based configuration.   >> Nothing is stopping anyone fro

Re: PowerPC speeds and the switch to Intel...

At 3:34 AM -0700 10/11/2009, Amanda Ward wrote: >On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Dan wrote: > > A picture is worth a thousand words! > > > > >Love it! (Secretly... I'd want one!) ;-) > >But why stop there... A G5 with

Re: PowerPC speeds and the switch to Intel...

On Oct 11, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Linda Hungerford wrote: > Still lurking mostly, but. could you translate this for this > novice? Don't know this terminology, starting with BIOS onward. All computers need some low-level 'smarts' so that they can start up, or 'bootstrap' themselves, a refere

Firewire 800 external drive

I have a Western Digital external drive hooked up with firewire 800 to my G4 Mac. I used disk utility to format and restore OS 10.5.8 to this drive. When I open the drive icon all seem OK but when I select it for the start up drive, another drive will boot. If I use "T" on startup I get a blue

Re: PowerPC speeds and the switch to Intel...

On Oct 9, 7:09 pm, Bruce Johnson wrote: > Apple differs from most intel-based PC's in that Macs do not have a   > BIOS, but instead use Open Firmware and EFI-based configuration.   > Nothing is stopping anyone from making an EFI-based PC. > > -- > Bruce Johnson > University of Arizona > College o

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

On Oct 10, 10:16 pm, DLC wrote: > Do you think that the DVD drive's firmware needs updating? it is a > model SONY CD-RW  CRX315E btw. I'm confused, I thought the CRX series was CD, not DVD; are you trying to load a DVD with a CD-RW? I hope not. I have a couple of Sonnet CPU upgrades and I always

Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not?

-- Original message -- Subject: Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not? Date:Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009N From:Kris Tilford To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com > According to xBench & GeekBench archives, Leopard's about 20-25% slower than > Tiger for PPC Macs, while count

Re: PowerPC speeds and the switch to Intel...

On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Dan wrote: > > At 12:52 AM -0400 10/10/2009, Dan wrote: >> At 11:19 PM -0400 10/9/2009, Richard Gerome wrote: >>> >>> Isn't it true that the G5 was way too hot for the laptop??? >> >> The PowerPC 970 (what Apple called the "G5") was physically too big, >> too hot, and

Re: Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable?

At 3:23 AM -0400 10/11/09, Dwight Hines wrote: > >And, has anyone figured out how to "secure" the individual Powerline adapters? I suspect you're talking about those "run the ethernet through your home power" dongles. I would think a fairly straightforward way to put at least some security on

Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable?

Subject: Insecure MacIntosh Powerline Networks: AT&T Liable? Researching the use of Powerline adapters for in-home, or even within business sites, you notice immediately that if you are using a pc instead of a Macintosh computer, there is a specific software package you can download to secure your