I'm not totally familiar with this since I've never used .Mac,
MobileMe, or iCloud. While it's certain that there will never be any
iCloud software for older PPC Macs similar to the iCloud control panel
and application integration available with Lion 10.7, I think your
current problem with
On Apr 16, 2012, at 10:20 PM, oneoftheharts wrote:
> I don't post very often and when I do I seem to be told that I posted
> to the wrong group. Maybe if this is the case again, someone can
> kindly direct me to the right list. FYI, I've been around since the
> Quadlist helped me with my Centri
I don't post very often and when I do I seem to be told that I posted
to the wrong group. Maybe if this is the case again, someone can
kindly direct me to the right list. FYI, I've been around since the
Quadlist helped me with my Centris 610...
For those who don't have a .mac account and wonder
> I believe SpeedTools is the only MacOS software that works with HDs
> larger than 128GB?
Probably, and why I retained it until I went over to MacOS X full time.
But, on my early MacOS X machines I usually employed the LBA48 hack, and
not Intech's kext.
--
You received this message because
>> One NEED NOT buy FWB, which I generally consider as "mal-ware".
>
> But what's your objection to FWB?
Generally, a non-responsive and/or non-existent support group.
Besides which, I have had my best results using a hacked version of Drive
Setup, in which I use ResEdit to change one of the Sea
On Apr 16, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
The only driver I had little love for was Intech Speedtools
I may have used SpeedTools rather than FWB to initialize my 80-to-50-
pin adapted SCA drives? Whichever I used, it wasn't because I thought
it had any advantage, it was because it
> One NEED NOT buy FWB, which I generally consider as "mal-ware".
I prefer LaCie Silverlining anyway, which is even A/UX aware. But what's
your objection to FWB?
The only driver I had little love for was Intech Speedtools, and not
because it was poor but because it had nothing the others didn't a
At 2:12 PM -0700 4/16/2012, peterh...@cruzio.com wrote:
One NEED NOT buy FWB, which I generally consider as "mal-ware".
With OS 7 thru 8.6, I preferred using FWB. Their driver was faster
than Apple's. That changed in 9.1, when Apple finally fixed their
buffering. At that point the two dri
> 3) I had to initialize the drive the first time with software other
> than Apple. I used FWB HD Toolkit I believe? Once initialized, the
> Apple software saw the drive, and I could reinitialize with the Apple
> software.
Drive Setup can be hacked, using ResEdit, to initialize almost ANY SCSI
dr
Here's my minimal experience with 80-pin to 50-pin adapted SCA drives:
1) mine also wouldn't recognize initially.
2) I believe I used jumpers on the "DLY" delay which causes the drive
to have time to spin-up from a cold start before it sends anything to
the Mac. My drives spun-up super slowly
> My temps run about 65 to 75 most of the time.
> We had a heat wave two years back and the temps in the condo got to
> 115 F. That made it leak.
Ugh. Glad to have central A/C here in the foothills.
> Well my Dual 2.7 power draw may be due to the 5 2TB internal HDD's ,
> they keep the fans bu
On Apr 16, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
As I stated the ambient is also very important here, plus never
crowd the
back of one of the "Stanley Steamers" (water pumpers) too lose to
a wall
they need breathing room.
Good point. Mine used to be crammed into a corner, but in my n
> > > My Dual 2.7 with either the Delphi or Panasonic LCS at idle is about
> > > 155 F equally between A and B. However they will vary 30 F between
> > > CPU's and top temps at 185 to 200 when loaded.
> >
> > That seems really high, but I've never used a dual 2.7, so maybe their
> > higher c
> > I ran the thermal calibration - it failed saying the CPUs (both of
> > them) have exceeded the maximum temperature.
>
> I question the reliability of the ASD's reports, with the Duals the
> ASD 2.5.7 and 2.5.8 will give different out comes on the tests a lot
> of times the 2.5.8 will al
> 50-pin SCSI became archaic YEARS and YEARS ago.
>
> Manufacturer capacity was changed to 68-pin (UW- and LVD/SE-SCSI) and
> 80-pin (SCA). Also various types of network-attached SCSI drives.
Seagate currently lists these SCSI drives:
9- and 18-GB Atlas (formerly Quantum, but re-branded as Seaga
> Incidentally, people are asking for some ridiculous prices for 50-pin SCSI
> drives on eBay. "Legacy" apparently becomes "antique" at some point. I was
> advised earlier on this forum that SCA drives were a workable option.
50-pin SCSI became archaic YEARS and YEARS ago.
Manufacturer capacity
on 4/16/12 12:09 PM, peterh...@cruzio.com at peterh...@cruzio.com wrote:
> The 8600 has two SCSI buses: a 10 MB/sec internal bus and a 5 MB-sec
> external bus. Each bus must be separately terminated.
>
> The standard internal cable is 1-wide, as is the external bus, although
> the external bus is
On Apr 16, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Michael Baudais wrote:
I ran the thermal calibration - it failed saying the CPUs (both of
them) have exceeded the maximum temperature.
I question the reliability of the ASD's reports, with the Duals the
ASD 2.5.7 and 2.5.8 will give different out comes on th
> However, I did a test to sidestep SCSI termination issues - I have an old
> SCSI CD-ROM external drive case, and put a working SCSI HD in it. It
> mounts, shows up on SCSI Bus 1. But the new 80 pin SCSI + adapter doesn't
> mount when placed in the external enclosure.
The 8600 has two SCSI buses
I ran the thermal calibration - it failed saying the CPUs (both of
them) have exceeded the maximum temperature.
The machine is totally clean - no liquid, no stains, no residue
anywhere. The seals seem solid. I don't believe that it's been
"leaking" as in dripping out. Could it evaporate
I've got a CD drive and a CD-RW drive on ID4 and ID6 - I assume there's
proper SCSI termination - if only because I've been using this setup for
years without any problems.
However, I did a test to sidestep SCSI termination issues - I have an old
SCSI CD-ROM external drive case, and put a working
On Apr 11, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>>> CPU A is indeed normally hotter than CPU B. The typical differential
>>> is
>>> around 10 degrees Centigrade, at least on the units I've seen, but not
>>> significantly higher than that.
>>
>> My Dual 2.7 with either the Delphi or Panasoni
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Baudais Michael wrote:
Hmmm, maybe I just noticed it after that cleaning because I was
checking to see if the temperature dropped...
Other notes:
- both pumps are running at 2436 rpm right now
- Temps are 45.6, 45.3, 33.6, 32.6 C
- Fans are at 2162, 2162 (CPU Exh
23 matches
Mail list logo
