Before spending any money, make sure you know where the bottleneck
really is. And give more information on what you mean by "very slow
at displaying screens."
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a
grou
I'll second David's comments about the 6200. I picked one up on eBay
for
about $85, and it made my DA DP feel three times as fast on the net. I
consider
it one of my best update buys to date.
- Michael B. in Cincinnati
On May 9, 9:47 pm, dc wrote:
> My vote is for the GeForce 6200/256MB, great p
My vote is for the GeForce 6200/256MB, great performance and lot's
cheaper than a Radeon 9800. They are PC cards that must be flashed or
purchased from someone who has prepped it for Mac. I have 6200s in
several Macs including Sawtooth, Cube and Digital Audio; they do not
have any sleep issues (or
On May 9, 2009, at 9:29 AM, DKline wrote:
>
> My system now has a stock Rage128 Pro Graphics card which is very slow
> at displaying screens. What upgrade cards are available AGP and would
> it significantly accelerate displaying
Yes, a faster card would help some. There are many ATI Radeons-
DKline wrote:
> My system now has a stock Rage128 Pro Graphics card which is very slow
> at displaying screens. What upgrade cards are available AGP and would
> it significantly accelerate displaying and downloading things on the
> internet. It's VRAM is only 16mb so I'm assuming it's creating a
My system now has a stock Rage128 Pro Graphics card which is very slow
at displaying screens. What upgrade cards are available AGP and would
it significantly accelerate displaying and downloading things on the
internet. It's VRAM is only 16mb so I'm assuming it's creating a
bootleneck to the ent
