Okay - Here is the web page where I am seeing this:
http://www.shutterfly.com/sites/view.sfly?fid=3f138555b3c8ef48
As I originally said, this is a message coming when I try to enter my
high school reunion social networking site
(which is on Shutterfly).
Not that I am planning to go to the reunio
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Kris Tilford wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:48 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>
> How do I run Webkit?
>>
>
> To run Webkit you download it and double-click the icon.
>
> Webkit is self-contained, meaning it's a stand-alone application that has
> it's own self-contained
On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:48 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
How do I run Webkit?
To run Webkit you download it and double-click the icon.
Webkit is self-contained, meaning it's a stand-alone application that
has it's own self-contained frameworks. Safari installs System
frameworks, hence, Safari ha
How do I run Webkit?
--
Steve Conrad
Henrietta, MO 64036
"The time has come for mankind to grow up and leave its cradle behind; to go
forth and claim our place in outer space."
- Capt. Henry Gloval
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Help Bunny Take Over The World!
--
You received th
rally suspicious person, I want to know why this
site would hate 3.0.4 so much before I download an upgrade just to
make Shutterfly happy. Does anybody know? Should I hate Safari 3.0.4
too?
Never heard of this. Perhaps something is coded to incorrectly check
the browser version? Exactly what/
At 12:19 AM -0400 6/1/2010, Dan wrote:
At 2:07 PM -0700 5/31/2010, Bruce - in Orlando wrote:
Quoth the Shutterfly message:
"Shutterfly Sites requires one of the following browsers:
Internet Explorer 6.0 +
FireFox 1.5 +
Safari 3.0 + (except 3.0.4)
Ok. No idea what "message" is. Is that someth
At 2:07 PM -0700 5/31/2010, Bruce - in Orlando wrote:
Quoth the Shutterfly message:
"Shutterfly Sites requires one of the following browsers:
Internet Explorer 6.0 +
FireFox 1.5 +
Safari 3.0 + (except 3.0.4)
Ok. No idea what "message" is. Is that something a Shutterfly
employee emailed to yo
Naturally, that's what I have on my MDD running
> >10.4. Being a naturally suspicious person, I want to know why this
> >site would hate 3.0.4 so much before I download an upgrade just to
> >make Shutterfly happy. Does anybody know? Should I hate Safari 3.0.4
> >too?
At 5:52 PM -0500 5/30/2010, Stephen Conrad wrote:
Insert my usual gripes about Safari 4.0.5 and its known memory leak.
Oh, get over it. EVERY browser on the market leaks.
1) Just run WebKit Nightly on top of Safari 4.0.5. That way you get
the latest Safari, with its HTML 5 support and the
Naturally, that's what I have on my MDD running
>> 10.4. Being a naturally suspicious person, I want to know why this
>> site would hate 3.0.4 so much before I download an upgrade just to
>> make Shutterfly happy. Does anybody know? Should I hate Safari 3.0.4
>> too?
&g
cious person, I want to know why this
site would hate 3.0.4 so much before I download an upgrade just to
make Shutterfly happy. Does anybody know? Should I hate Safari 3.0.4
too?
Never heard of this. Perhaps something is coded to incorrectly check
the browser version? Exactly what/where sa
.4 so much before I download an upgrade just to
make Shutterfly happy. Does anybody know? Should I hate Safari 3.0.4
too?
Bruce - in Orlando
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power
On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:08 PM, dorayme wrote:
>
> Which brings me to a suggestion:
>
> Instead of
>
> == 1 of 1 ==
>
> why not have
>
> == 1 of 1 of 'Safari 3.0.4' ==
>
> etc so that you always knew exactly what the topic was in reading
> *each
On 17/09/2009, at 6:56 AM, g3-5-list group wrote:
> ==
>
> TOPIC: Safari 3.0.4
> http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list/t/412bad2760
On Sep 15, 5:55 pm, dorayme wrote:
>
> 7. Finally I try to reply. But by the time I have come to this
> crucial and all important step, I am so exhausted that I have to go
> and lie down with a couple of Bex powders. When recovered I have
> forgotten what I wanted to say.
>
> If anyone know
At 7:55 AM +1000 9/16/2009, dorayme wrote:
>[snip - machinations of dealing with g's digest format]
>If anyone knows how to improve above algorithm, don't hesitate to say
>now! I dislike replying using Google. But maybe it would be easier!
Get off digest mode. That way you'll have the reference
On 15/09/2009, at 6:24 PM, g3-5-list group wrote:
> Date: Tues, Sep 15 2009 12:30 am
> From: dorayme
>
>
>> Date: Mon, Sep 14 2009 8:51 pm
>> From: WhyOSX
>>
>>
>> Safari 4 just won't work at all.
>> so it doesn't do any damage.
>>
>> G4/733-1GB-10.4.11 & 9.2.2
>
> So how come WhyOSX says he has
At 5:30 PM +1000 9/15/2009, dorayme wrote:
> > From: WhyOSX
> > Safari 4 just won't work at all.
>
>So how come [...]
Inflammatory statements with no supporting information == trolling;
to be ignored.
I do like his mail headers tho.
- Dan.
--
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Ear
I'm using 3.2.3 - have I written in something so stupid ?
But indeed there is a G3/350 b&w running 10.4.11 and 9.2.2.
>
>> Date: Mon, Sep 14 2009 8:51 pm
>> From: WhyOSX
>>
>>
>> Safari 4 just won't work at all.
>> so it doesn't do any damage.
>>
>> G4/733-1GB-10.4.11 & 9.2.2
>
>So how come WhyO
> Date: Mon, Sep 14 2009 8:51 pm
> From: WhyOSX
>
>
> Safari 4 just won't work at all.
> so it doesn't do any damage.
>
> G4/733-1GB-10.4.11 & 9.2.2
So how come WhyOSX says he has it running fine on two of his
computers running his powermacs with 10.4.11?
--
dorayme
--~--~-~--~
Safari 4 just won't work at all.
so it doesn't do any damage.
G4/733-1GB-10.4.11 & 9.2.2
>Backup your system first, just like you would for ANY update from Apple.
Always a good idea.
>Safari 4 uses the same file formats (bookmarks, etc) as Safari 3, so
>they're not converted or anything.
>-
At 9:30 AM +1000 9/15/2009, dorayme wrote:
>I like to hear this. I have been put off updating hearing so many
>scare stories. Is there anything special you did before updating?
Backup your system first, just like you would for ANY update from Apple.
Safari 4 uses the same file formats (bookmark
> Date: Sun, Sep 13 2009 2:20 pm
> From: MaGioZal
>
>
> On 8/30/09 5:36 PM, J.M.P.Hissel at wrote:
>
>> No Leopard needed for Safari 4.0.3. It installed and runs
>> flawlessly on my
>> QS 800 (2002), 1,5 GB RAM and my Sawtooth 400, 1,75 GB RAM, both
>> running
>> 10.4.11.
>
> It's my daily br
On 8/30/09 5:36 PM, J.M.P.Hissel at wrote:
> No Leopard needed for Safari 4.0.3. It installed and runs flawlessly on my
> QS 800 (2002), 1,5 GB RAM and my Sawtooth 400, 1,75 GB RAM, both running
> 10.4.11.
It's my daily browser of choice, running on my old faithful Beige G3 (thanks
to XPostFact
On Aug 30, 2009, at 11:13 AM, chefsaid wrote:
>
> Hi, thank you for the information I will try that ,and I am very
> sorry
> about not starting a new topic,for I have never done this before and
> how do
> you start a new topic,thank you again,jimmy
If you're getting this as email just sen
You can fix that in System Pref in Dashboard expose!!! What you are
getting is Top Sites in Safari... CoolKat
-Original Message-
>From: Stephen Conrad
>Sent: Aug 30, 2009 12:47 PM
>To: g3-5-list
>Subject: Safari 3.0.4
>
>
>Why does this browser seem to bri
At 4:45 PM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>Thanks ll!
>I now have 4.0.3
>re there any updates for this version that I need?
Safari 4.0.3 is the most up-to-date release. But I like to use the
latest WebKit nightly - it's even faster.
Remember to turn off the fraudulent site checking. T
gt;>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Danwrote:
>>>>>>At 11:47 AM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Yo
;> > At 11:47 AM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You mean Safari 3 or Safari 4?
>>>>>
>>>> I had Safari 3.0.4 an I have now upgraded to 3.2.3
>>>> I'd need 10.5.6 (IIC) to install Safari v4
>>&g
gt;
>>>> You mean Safari 3 or Safari 4?
>>>>
>>> I had Safari 3.0.4 an I have now upgraded to 3.2.3
>>> I'd need 10.5.6 (IIC) to install Safari v4
>>>
>> Safari 4 runs just fine on Tiger, and is much faster tha
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Dan wrote:
>
> At 12:55 PM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>>On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan wrote:
>> > At 11:47 AM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>>>
>>> You mean Safari 3 or Safari 4?
>>
&
On 30-08-2009 19:55, Stephen Conrad, khel...@gmail.com, wrote:
> I had Safari 3.0.4 an I have now upgraded to 3.2.3
> I'd need 10.5.6 (IIC) to install Safari v4
No Leopard needed for Safari 4.0.3. It installed and runs flawlessly on my
QS 800 (2002), 1,5 GB RAM and my Sawtooth 400,
At 12:55 PM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan wrote:
> > At 11:47 AM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>>
>> You mean Safari 3 or Safari 4?
>
>I had Safari 3.0.4 an I have now upgraded to 3.2.3
>I'd need 10.5.6
PM
Subject: G5 kernel Panics, was Re: Safari 3.0.4
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:20 AM, chefsaid wrote:
>
>>
>> hi,my Power Mac G5 shuts down all the time and the error is kernel
>> panic
>> code,I called apple and they said it was corupt software,but that
>&
On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:20 AM, chefsaid wrote:
>
> hi,my Power Mac G5 shuts down all the time and the error is kernel
> panic
> code,I called apple and they said it was corupt software,but that
> did not
> fix the problem,does anyone know what I can do I need help,a friend
> said it
> could
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan wrote:
>
> At 11:47 AM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>
> You mean Safari 3 or Safari 4?
I had Safari 3.0.4 an I have now upgraded to 3.2.3
I'd need 10.5.6 (IIC) to install Safari v4
>
>>Why does this browser seem to brin
At 11:47 AM -0500 8/30/2009, Stephen Conrad wrote:
You mean Safari 3 or Safari 4?
>Why does this browser seem to bring about the Spinning Beach ball when
>I leave it open all night?
Flash is full of memory leaks.
Safari 3's RSS checking isn't very good - it gets itself knotted up.
Safari 4's
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Johnson"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Safari 3.0.4
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>
>>
>> Why does this browser seem to bring about the Spinning Beach ball when
>> I leave
On Aug 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>
> Why does this browser seem to bring about the Spinning Beach ball when
> I leave it open all night?
More than likely it's flash crud, though 3.0 was also prone to memory
leaks.
Can't you update it? Not sure what OS/Computer you're using
On Aug 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Stephen Conrad wrote:
>
> Also, a different question
>
> How do I stop this machine from moving all my windows into little
> screens when the mouse moves to a corner?
System Preferences > Expose and Spaces. (this is where it is in 10.5,
istr it's the same in 10
Why does this browser seem to bring about the Spinning Beach ball when
I leave it open all night?
I browse the same pages as I did on the B&W G3 (Smurf) and I don't
recall seeing this happening back then.
Also, a different question
How do I stop this machine from moving all my windows into littl
41 matches
Mail list logo
