On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 15:04, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2008-12-15, 13:45 GMT, Nikos Kouremenos wrote:
> > git is not very nice to Microsoft Windows and I guess we all
> > love Python here.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/
I know the project, don't consider it ready.
> and do you use text ed
On 2008-12-15, 13:45 GMT, Nikos Kouremenos wrote:
> git is not very nice to Microsoft Windows and I guess we all
> love Python here.
http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/
and do you use text editor and C-compiler written in Python (or
do you use pypy)? This argument doesn't make any sense.
Of cour
Am 15.12.2008 um 14:46 schrieb Michal 'vorner' Vaner:
I'm not saying it is problem of usability, but of familiarity. I'm
able
to, for example, edit the history before I push my commits, if I make
mistake, with git. I do not think I can do this with hg. I do not
say I
can not do it. I just s
git is not very nice to Microsoft Windows and I guess we all love Python
here.
Ok Yann didn't know you couldn't bare svn anymore, I'm curious how that
happened ;)
I curse you all to go back to the days of cvs :P hehe
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 15:31, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
> Hello
>
> On S
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Nico Gulden wrote:
>> recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat.
>>
>> I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why.
>> Because
>> Gajim
Hello
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Nico Gulden wrote:
> recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat.
>
> I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why. Because
> Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could be
> the
> I recently merged bosh branch and trunk, and I cannot bear svn
> anymore.
> And as Jonathan said, I already configures a mercurial repo a trac
> test
> too. What needs to be done: port all hook scripts we had in svn, map
> svn
> revs to hg revs (I have no idea how to do that ...)
>
> So this wil
Nico Gulden wrote:
> Hello Gajim-Developers,
>
> recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat.
>
> I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why. Because
> Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could be
> the best
> choice.
>
>
Hallöchen!
Damien Thébault writes:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 21:24, Nico Gulden wrote:
>
>> I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline
>> why. Because Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess
>> Mercurial (hg) [1] could be the best choice.
>>
>> For me DVCS has only
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 21:24, Nico Gulden wrote:
> I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why. Because
> Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could be
> the best
> choice.
>
> For me DVCS has only advantages ;-)
>
> - Speed
> - Complete rep
Am 14.12.2008 um 00:48 schrieb Nikos Kouremenos:
not that I hack anymore on Gajim but I am always against DVCS and
their ideas and especially on projects with small amount of
contributors such as Gajim.
I strongly believe that SVN rocks and also for you to commit
upstream and keep it cent
not that I hack anymore on Gajim but I am always against DVCS and their
ideas and especially on projects with small amount of contributors such as
Gajim.
I strongly believe that SVN rocks and also for you to commit upstream and
keep it centralized and great. On big projects this "must commit your
Asterix has already set up a test repo with hg, I checked it out via
ssh and everything seemed to work fine, even the test trac with
mercurial worked fine :). The only thing left is to map the old svn
revision IDs to the matching hg revision IDs.
Asterix said we'll switch after 0.12 :).
--
Jonat
Hello Gajim-Developers,
recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat.
I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why. Because
Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could be the
best
choice.
For me DVCS has only advantages ;-)
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
