Re: [galaxy-dev] MarkupSafe egg missing? e.args[1].key != e.args[0].key

2014-11-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:23 PM, John Chilton jmchil...@gmail.com wrote: Ummm... I think it is that the VM started shipping with an incompatible paramkio. [...] Anyway - planemo's TravisCI integration tests Galaxy in a virtualenv and it works fine [...] That's a useful workaround, but a

Re: [galaxy-dev] MarkupSafe egg missing? e.args[1].key != e.args[0].key

2014-11-18 Thread John Chilton
Oops forgot to cc the list. On Nov 18, 2014 7:26 AM, John Chilton jmchil...@gmail.com wrote: I will admit to not actually understanding Galaxy's dependency management but I think virtualenv is exactly the advice people who do understand it give

Re: [galaxy-dev] MarkupSafe egg missing? e.args[1].key != e.args[0].key

2014-11-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Nov 18, 2014 7:26 AM, John Chilton jmchil...@gmail.com wrote: I will admit to not actually understanding Galaxy's dependency management but I think virtualenv is exactly the advice people who do understand it give http://dev.list.galaxyproject.org/Local-installation-problem-td4662627.html.

Re: [galaxy-dev] MarkupSafe egg missing? e.args[1].key != e.args[0].key

2014-11-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Nov 18, 2014 7:26 AM, John Chilton jmchil...@gmail.com wrote: I will admit to not actually understanding Galaxy's dependency management but I think virtualenv is exactly the advice people who do understand it give

Re: [galaxy-dev] MarkupSafe egg missing? e.args[1].key != e.args[0].key

2014-11-18 Thread Nate Coraor
Peter, Unless you've made modifications to Galaxy that depend on external libraries, switching to a virtualenv for the server itself should be pretty safe. Tools themselves can still run without using the/any virtualenv, if desired. --nate On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Peter Cock

Re: [galaxy-dev] MarkupSafe egg missing? e.args[1].key != e.args[0].key

2014-11-18 Thread Peter Cock
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Nate Coraor n...@bx.psu.edu wrote: Peter, Unless you've made modifications to Galaxy that depend on external libraries, switching to a virtualenv for the server itself should be pretty safe. Tools themselves can still run without using the/any virtualenv, if

[galaxy-dev] master_api_key currently doesn't benefit from a real admin's key?!

2014-11-18 Thread Dooley, Damion
I made the erroneous assumption that if I put my own admin user API key into the galaxy configuration master_api_key field, it would accept that and run all the api functions that needed a key connected to a user. It took fair bit of debugging to realize that the master_api_key field chops off

[galaxy-dev] how to use api to log in Galaxy?

2014-11-18 Thread xlwang
Hi, I want to integrate Galaxy with another system. When I log in this system, then click a link jump to Galaxy, this user has already logged into Galaxy. Now, I can use api to create a user at the same time in this system and Galaxy, but how to use api to log in

[galaxy-dev] galaxy server file upload problem

2014-11-18 Thread 홍종희
Hi galaxy-dev members Recently we're trying to setup the galaxy server in a production mode. Everything seems to be ok but when I tried to upload a file it shows error message like this Failed: Not found(404) I found one thread in galaxy-dev fourn about this one It says that it's because of

[galaxy-dev] Problem with LWR (input size limitation)

2014-11-18 Thread Misharl Monsoor
Hi everybody, In our lab, we are trying to connect our Galaxy instance to a Windows 7 64 bits server, in order to executes programs that need to be run within Windows. However we have a problem concerning the size of the input that is uploaded to the Windows server, it doesn't accept inputs

[galaxy-dev] Bug with multiple reverse proxies

2014-11-18 Thread Jan Kanis
Hi, We ran into a problem if galaxy is running behind multiple reverse proxies. Galaxy assumes that the X-Forwarded-Host header only contains a single host to which it redirects, but apache will append comma-separated components to it if it already exists, which is the case of multiple reverse