to
be important to have them there
Regards,
Thon
[cid:enz_logo_2_new36d101]
Thon deBoer
Director of Software
3415 Colorado Ave.
Room A255
Boulder, CO 80303
Cell: (650) 799-6839
tdeb...@enzymatics.com
www.enzymatics.com
Enzymatics Inc. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any
the workflow editor accomplish what you need?
--
James Taylor
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Thon deBoer
tdeb...@enzymatics.commailto:tdeb...@enzymatics.com wrote:
Hi,
In order to make Galaxy workflows even more useful, it is going to be important
for data files to be renamed in a workflow.
I know we
of workflow a tedious task...
Regards,
Thon
[cid:enz_logo_2_new0600d5]
Thon deBoer
Director of Software
3415 Colorado Ave.
Room A255
Boulder, CO 80303
Cell: (650) 799-6839
tdeb...@enzymatics.com
www.enzymatics.com
Enzymatics Inc. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments
of workflow a tedious task...
Regards,
Thon
[cid:enz_logo_2_newf03327]
Thon deBoer
Director of Software
3415 Colorado Ave.
Room A255
Boulder, CO 80303
Cell: (650) 799-6839
tdeb...@enzymatics.com
www.enzymatics.com
Enzymatics Inc. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments
Hi,
I am routinely running hundreds of pair-end sequencing runs and find that
STARTING a workflow on all of these can easily take hours since it seems
each workflow preparation takes about 3 minutes, so for doing 128 fastq
pairs like this it will take over 3 hours just to get all workflows
Hi,
One of the biggest hurdles for the implementation in our institute is the
inability of Galaxy API to set parameters at run time.
You can only seem to set inputs, but not parameters...
Is there any ETA on when this will be available? Is this even a priority?
Thanks!
Regards,
Thon de Boer,
But this only works if you have a single dataset (such as a BAM file) for each
workflow to run on.
If you have pairs of files (such as paired end FASTQ files, not an uncommon
workflow nowadays :) ) you need to resort to using the API, since there is no
support for paired end sequencing in
Hi,
I am continueing to struggle with the API
I have created a workflow execution engine that submits a workflow using the
examples in the API (scripts/api).
When I run the WF on data in the LIBRARIES everything works fine.
But when I choose a HISTORY as my source of data, the WF executes
Is this conference open for anyone or just (self appointed?) Czars? :)
Regards,
Thon de Boer, Ph.D.
Bioinformatics Guru
+1-650-799-6839
thondeb...@me.com
LinkedIn Profile
On Jun 28, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Sebastian Schaaf wrote:
Also hello to everyone,
As I browsed through those tabs which
Regards,
Thon de Boer, Ph.D.
Bioinformatics Guru
+1-650-799-6839
thondeb...@me.com
LinkedIn Profile
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Thon Deboer wrote:
Hi,
I am continueing to struggle with the API
I have created a workflow execution engine that submits a workflow using the
examples
Check the Paster.log file...You probably will see an error there when it tries
to load your file and it will be a clue how to fix it...
Regards,
Thon de Boer, Ph.D.
Bioinformatics Guru
+1-650-799-6839
thondeb...@me.com
LinkedIn Profile
On Jun 21, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Ciara Ledero wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Is there a way to extract the individual files from a composite file, such as
the HTML files created by the picard tools?
I would like to take the metrics files and use them further down in some
workflow, but I only get an HTML file...
While these HTML files are nice for quickly looking at
Hi,
I had no problems with providing my galaxy installation with datasets that were
links to files in my filesystem, when I was using the SQLite database.
But when I switched to a Postgres database, the links result in empty files
when I choose links in the dataset upload.
When I use actual
Hi,
I am trying to pass some key-value pairs to the result of a tool (such as the
original sample name) but I cannot find a way to do this in the galaxy XML tool
definitions.
I am simply trying to retain in all the data files I produce, the name of the
original sample which the results are
.
Bioinformatics Guru
LinkedIn Profile
On Dec 31, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Thon deBoer wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to pass some key-value pairs to the result of a tool (such as the
original sample name) but I cannot find a way to do this in the galaxy XML
tool definitions.
I am simply trying
be a way to rename an output file to the original input file in the
workflow step Rename Dataset?
Regards,
Thon de Boer, Ph.D.
Bioinformatics Guru
+1-650-799-6839
thondeb...@me.com
LinkedIn Profile
On Dec 31, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Thon deBoer
16 matches
Mail list logo