Björn, Peter, and John,
Thanks for finding and fixing this issue -- the fix has been merged
into galaxy-central and should be available with the next distribution
release currently scheduled for April 1. We're also looking into
adding parallelism tests to our normal testing procedure to prevent
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Dannon Baker dannon.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Björn, Peter, and John,
Thanks for finding and fixing this issue -- the fix has been merged
into galaxy-central and should be available with the next distribution
release currently scheduled for April 1. We're also
Hi all,
can anyone confirm that the parallelism features is not working in
galaxy-central? Parallelism is among others used by the blast+ wrappers.
The only error message I get is:
galaxy.jobs DEBUG 2013-03-17 16:08:27,729 (64174) Working directory for
job
is:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Björn Grüning wrote:
Hi all,
can anyone confirm that the parallelism features is not working in
galaxy-central? Parallelism is among others used by the blast+ wrappers.
The only error message I get is:
galaxy.jobs DEBUG 2013-03-17 16:08:27,729 (64174)
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2013, 15:26 + schrieb Peter Cock:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Björn Grüning wrote:
Hi all,
can anyone confirm that the parallelism features is not working in
galaxy-central? Parallelism is among others used by the blast+ wrappers.
The only error message
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Björn Grüning
bjoern.gruen...@pharmazie.uni-freiburg.de wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2013, 15:26 + schrieb Peter Cock:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Björn Grüning wrote:
Hi all,
can anyone confirm that the parallelism features is not working in
I believe the following changeset fixes this problem.
https://bitbucket.org/jmchilton/galaxy-central-lwr/commits/3b6c209d2d078bad2fa9957fe989345d3d2533ae
I have incorporated the fix into pull request 138 that has other job
runner fixes and enhancements.
-John
P.S.
Peter's point about the
Hi John,
works great, thanks for your effort!
I believe the following changeset fixes this problem.
https://bitbucket.org/jmchilton/galaxy-central-lwr/commits/3b6c209d2d078bad2fa9957fe989345d3d2533ae
I have incorporated the fix into pull request 138 that has other job
runner fixes and
A new next-stable branch on Galaxy central is currently scheduled for tomorrow
( 3/18/13 ) in preparation for the next Galaxy dist release currently scheduled
for 4/1/13.. This means that the main tool shed will be updated tomorrow to
this next-stable branch.
This branch includes a new tool
On Mar 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Björn Grüning wrote:
Maybe its possible to run a few selected toolshed tools in an automatic
test suite before each release or after such large changes. We have
really complex tools in the toolshed that uses mainly all features
available.
Have a nice weekend!
10 matches
Mail list logo
