>> One of my colleagues is having trouble developing a peculiar tool: it
has no inputs. This makes sense in our local
>> context - it fetches some constantly updating remote data for the
current user - but implementing it has escaped our
>> skill. Galaxy complains about a tool with no params (i.e.
-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu]
namens Peter Cock [p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com]
Verzonden: maandag 16 mei 2011 18:11
Aan: Duddy, John
CC: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu
Onderwerp: Re: [galaxy-dev] A tool with no inputs
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Duddy, John wrote:
Doesn’t this violate one of the
-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu]
namens Peter Cock [p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com]
Verzonden: maandag 16 mei 2011 18:11
Aan: Duddy, John
CC: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu
Onderwerp: Re: [galaxy-dev] A tool with no inputs
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Duddy, John wrote:
> Doesn’t this violate one of the basic t
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Duddy, John wrote:
> Doesn’t this violate one of the basic tenets of Galaxy – reproducibility?
> Without the ability to provide full traceability to the inputs, one can make
> no guarantees about the outputs.
Yes, but not everyone puts that as a number one priorit
8-736-3584
E-mail: jdu...@illumina.com<mailto:jdu...@illumina.com>
From: galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu
[mailto:galaxy-dev-boun...@lists.bx.psu.edu] On Behalf Of Paul-Michael Agapow
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 7:45 AM
To: galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu
Subject: [galaxy-dev] A tool with no
One of my colleagues is having trouble developing a peculiar tool: it
has no inputs. This makes sense in our local context - it fetches some
constantly updating remote data for the current user - but implementing
it has escaped our skill. Galaxy complains about a tool with no params
(i.e. an empty
