galaxy-...@bx.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] Galaxy Release Cycle Length
Message-ID: 521464d2.5010...@fmi.ch
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Dave
two months is a good time between releases.
Much more important than the release cycle length is fixing identified
bugs
Hi Dave
two months is a good time between releases.
Much more important than the release cycle length is fixing identified
bugs on the release branch as well.
Regards, Hans-Rudolf
On 08/20/2013 08:36 PM, Dave Clements wrote:
Hello all,
At one of the GCC2013 Birds of a Feather sessions
Why the dislike for quick turnover? Could somebody present the arguments for
people not having been at the BOF?
People don't have to upgrade - unless its breaking changes that e.g. disable
the possibility to download from the public toolshed which forced me to upgrade.
The alternative to
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013, Ido Tamir wrote:
Why the dislike for quick turnover? Could somebody present the arguments
for people not having been at the BOF?
People don't have to upgrade - unless its breaking changes that e.g.
disable the possibility to download from the public toolshed
Hello all,
At one of the GCC2013 Birds of a Feather
sessionshttp://wiki.galaxyproject.org/Events/GCC2013/BoF/PublicGalaxyServers
the
group was very clear that they would like to see less frequent releases of
Galaxy. We're currently aiming to do a release every 2 months and have
been pretty
