On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:21 PM, bjoern.gruen...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>>
>> 2014-07-31 10:57 GMT+02:00 Peter Cock :
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> You are right that on closer inspection I've mixed tool_dependencies.xml
>>> and rep
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:21 PM, bjoern.gruen...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>
> 2014-07-31 10:57 GMT+02:00 Peter Cock :
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> You are right that on closer inspection I've mixed tool_dependencies.xml
>> and repository_dependencies.xml *again*. Evidentially my mental model
>>
Hi Peter,
2014-07-31 10:57 GMT+02:00 Peter Cock :
> Hi Dave,
>
> You are right that on closer inspection I've mixed tool_dependencies.xml
> and repository_dependencies.xml *again*. Evidentially my mental model
> does not match Greg's here:
>
> (*) I need to define a tool installation recipe for
Hi Dave,
You are right that on closer inspection I've mixed tool_dependencies.xml
and repository_dependencies.xml *again*. Evidentially my mental model
does not match Greg's here:
(*) I need to define a tool installation recipe for something not in the
Tool Shed --> write an install script called
Peter,
I believe part of the problem is that the install and test framework is unable
to resolve the dependency on blast+ 2.2.29 because it is defined as a
repository dependency, not a tool dependency. I would recommend replacing the
repository dependency in the blast_rbh repository with a too
