Re: [galaxy-user] FASTQ to FASTQSanger using Groomer question

2011-03-22 Thread Eric Cabot
Illumina's technical support team told me two weeks ago that Cassava 1.8 will not be released for at least six weeks. That makes it at least a month from now. Do you know anyone outside the company that has used it yet? Beyond the moaning within the cited seqanswers thread, I'd be interested i

Re: [galaxy-user] FASTQ to FASTQSanger using Groomer question

2011-03-21 Thread Peter Cock
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:42 PM, David K Crossman wrote: > Hello! > > > >     I am fairly new to using Galaxy and have a question about > the FASTQ Groomer feature.  I have 4 RNA-Seq raw data files that were just > recently generated from Illumina’s NGS instruments. Very recently? If

Re: [galaxy-user] FASTQ to FASTQSanger using Groomer question

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Blankenberg
Hi David, Your files appear to be of the Sanger FASTQ variant. As you have noticed, the info blurb provided by the Grooming tool provides information that should be utilized to confirm input types. While the 'Illumina 1.3+' FASTQ format does encode scores using a different ASCII range, it is m

[galaxy-user] FASTQ to FASTQSanger using Groomer question

2011-03-21 Thread David K Crossman
Hello! I am fairly new to using Galaxy and have a question about the FASTQ Groomer feature. I have 4 RNA-Seq raw data files that were just recently generated from Illumina's NGS instruments. I am aware that the first step to perform in Galaxy is FASTQ Groomer to convert the fo