Re: [galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-21 Thread Dannon Baker
It doesn't look like you're using workflow parameters in this workflow. Or were you trying to, and something perhaps went wrong? As to your "None" error, in the sort in step 21 of the workflow you shared it looks like the column selection is None, and I'm guessing that's the problem here. Let

Re: [galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-20 Thread David Matthews
Done, many thanks... Best Wishes, David. __ Dr David A. Matthews Senior Lecturer in Virology Room E49 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences University Walk, University of Bristol Bristol. BS8 1TD U.K. Tel. +44 117 3312058 Fax.

Re: [galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-20 Thread Dannon Baker
I'll take a look at the workflow in question, if you'd like to share it with me at this email address, 'dannonba...@me.com'. -Dannon On Apr 20, 2011, at 12:42 PM, David Matthews wrote: > Hi, > > I've followed this thread with interest. I have had a problem on one of my > workflows, it fails

Re: [galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-20 Thread David Matthews
Hi, I've followed this thread with interest. I have had a problem on one of my workflows, it fails to perform a sort on a dataset returning the error "sort: invalid number at field start: invalid count at start of `None,Nonen'". However, this error makes no sense. When I ask it to run the job a

Re: [galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-20 Thread Peter Cock
Hi Dan, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Dannon Baker wrote: > The issue you're seeing is actually related to improper initialization of > the workflow parameters index in the special case where a particular > parameter is only used in a rename action and not in a tool step.  This > is fixed in r

Re: [galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-20 Thread Peter Cock
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Douglas Allan wrote: > get me off this email list > Please don't hijack existing threads. See: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/pipermail/galaxy-user/2011-April/002281.html and: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/pipermail/galaxy-user/2011-April/002439.html Peter _

Re: [galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-20 Thread Dannon Baker
The issue you're seeing is actually related to improper initialization of the workflow parameters index in the special case where a particular parameter is only used in a rename action and not in a tool step. This is fixed in revision 5400:6cacf178a129. -Dannon On Apr 20, 2011, at 10:28 AM,

[galaxy-user] Workflows with run time parameters broken?

2011-04-20 Thread Peter Cock
Hi all, I noticed a new problem with our local Galaxy (recently updated), but found it happens on the public installation too. I can edit workflows, and create run time parameters like ${Name} or ${Name with spaces}, but when I come to run the workflow I get an error: > Server Error >An error o