Re: [Audyssey] SC2 and SC4 (was Re: king of fighters xiii gameplay!

2011-12-01 Thread Tom Randall
Oh wow, never found those menus in SC2 before, I will have to go over there and 
check them out more carefully.  Hopefully I can find my old cheat sheet on 
SC2's menus.

Thanks.

Game on.

Tom
On Nov 28, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Clement Chou wrote:

> It actually has a few more modes than 4, and it still has the Japanese track. 
> The only game that didn't have one was the original Soul Calibur on the 
> dreamcast which only had Japanese voices. Mode wise, soul calibur has your 
> typical arcade and versus, as well as team battle, survival, time attack and 
> a weapon master mode. The weapon master mode isn't negotiable without sighted 
> assistance, sadly.
> - Original Message - From: "Tom Randall" 
> To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 4:31 PM
> Subject: [Audyssey] SC2 and SC4 (was Re: king of fighters xiii gameplay!
> 
> 
>> Hey again.
>> 
>> Ok thanks lots that is what I was hoping to hear.  I should clarify, what I 
>> mean by limited is that so far as I know you don't have as many game options 
>> available, say the multilanguage voice tracks and so forth like you do in 
>> SC4.  That was the kind of thing I was referring to not so much the game 
>> play itself.
>> 
>> Thanks for mentioning the no finishing moves and no breakable armor thing as 
>> well I can just tell him to ignore any references to that kind of thing in 
>> the podcast.  I actually really do like SC2 as well myself so what I will 
>> probably end up doing is just pick up another copy and either keep it or let 
>> my friend have that one and take my original back.  I actually found SC2 to 
>> be much easier to get a handle on for some reason than I have with SC4 but 
>> SC4 is finally starting to make at least some sense to me thank the gods.
>> 
>> Game on.
>> 
>> Tom
>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Clement Chou wrote:
>> 
>>> SC 2 isn't actually more limiting. A lot of people, including myself, find 
>>> SC 2 a lot better because it's faster and more balanced... but yes, the 
>>> basic gameplay is the same. SC 2 doesn't have critical finishers or 
>>> breakable armor, but the rest of it is more or less the same... though I 
>>> don't remember as it's been ages since I played it.
>>> - Original Message - From: "Tom Randall" 
>>> To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
>>> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:23 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Audyssey] king of fighters xiii gameplay!
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hey.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes I do recall you saying that you intended to do another one sometime so 
>>>> will definitely be looking forward to that.
>>>> 
>>>> Yeah I was pretty happy about that myself, I let people listen to these 
>>>> things pretty often and most of them say oh that's cool but that's about 
>>>> as far as it goes so to have somebody show some pretty serious interest 
>>>> was great.  I'm not sure he's gonna run out and buy a PS3 or Xbox or 
>>>> anything but who knows.  So just wanted you to know that these things 
>>>> you're spending time doing really are making a difference and maybe 
>>>> helping get some more of us into mainstream gaming which we all know is a 
>>>> good thing.
>>>> 
>>>> Oh by the way, is much of that SC4 podcast applicable to SC2?  I know SC2 
>>>> is much more limited in the things you can do and the options you have and 
>>>> so on, I am talking about how the basic game play works.  The reason I ask 
>>>> is I gave a good friend of mine who is also blind my PS2 and a copy of SC2 
>>>> for Xmas and if this would help him get some of the basics down it'd be 
>>>> great and I obviously no longer have it here to experiment with and find 
>>>> out myself so would appreciate any input you or anyone else for that 
>>>> matter has on this.
>>>> 
>>>> Game on.
>>>> 
>>>> Tom
>>>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Clement Chou wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Well, I did say in that recording I did intend to come back and do 
>>>>> another one which is more in depth. I'll look into doing one for MK as 
>>>>> well, when I dig the game back up out of my no-longer-played stack. haha. 
>>>>> It's been a while since I played that game... I'm glad you found the 
>>>>> podcasts useful... and to hear that you got someone else interest

Re: [Audyssey] SC2 and SC4 (was Re: king of fighters xiii gameplay!

2011-12-01 Thread dan cook
hi. Just out of curiosity, do you have the sc4 and mvc3 casts archived
somewhere? I would love to have a look, as those games are two i want
to buy. Thank you in advance sir.

On 11/29/11, Clement Chou  wrote:
> It actually has a few more modes than 4, and it still has the Japanese
> track. The only game that didn't have one was the original Soul Calibur on
> the dreamcast which only had Japanese voices. Mode wise, soul calibur has
> your typical arcade and versus, as well as team battle, survival, time
> attack and a weapon master mode. The weapon master mode isn't negotiable
> without sighted assistance, sadly.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom Randall" 
> To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 4:31 PM
> Subject: [Audyssey] SC2 and SC4 (was Re: king of fighters xiii gameplay!
>
>
>> Hey again.
>>
>> Ok thanks lots that is what I was hoping to hear.  I should clarify, what
>> I mean by limited is that so far as I know you don't have as many game
>> options available, say the multilanguage voice tracks and so forth like
>> you do in SC4.  That was the kind of thing I was referring to not so much
>> the game play itself.
>>
>> Thanks for mentioning the no finishing moves and no breakable armor thing
>> as well I can just tell him to ignore any references to that kind of thing
>>
>> in the podcast.  I actually really do like SC2 as well myself so what I
>> will probably end up doing is just pick up another copy and either keep it
>>
>> or let my friend have that one and take my original back.  I actually
>> found SC2 to be much easier to get a handle on for some reason than I have
>>
>> with SC4 but SC4 is finally starting to make at least some sense to me
>> thank the gods.
>>
>> Game on.
>>
>> Tom
>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Clement Chou wrote:
>>
>>> SC 2 isn't actually more limiting. A lot of people, including myself,
>>> find SC 2 a lot better because it's faster and more balanced... but yes,
>>> the basic gameplay is the same. SC 2 doesn't have critical finishers or
>>> breakable armor, but the rest of it is more or less the same... though I
>>> don't remember as it's been ages since I played it.
>>> - Original Message - From: "Tom Randall" 
>>> To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
>>> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:23 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Audyssey] king of fighters xiii gameplay!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hey.
>>>>
>>>> Yes I do recall you saying that you intended to do another one sometime
>>>> so will definitely be looking forward to that.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah I was pretty happy about that myself, I let people listen to these
>>>> things pretty often and most of them say oh that's cool but that's about
>>>>
>>>> as far as it goes so to have somebody show some pretty serious interest
>>>> was great.  I'm not sure he's gonna run out and buy a PS3 or Xbox or
>>>> anything but who knows.  So just wanted you to know that these things
>>>> you're spending time doing really are making a difference and maybe
>>>> helping get some more of us into mainstream gaming which we all know is
>>>> a good thing.
>>>>
>>>> Oh by the way, is much of that SC4 podcast applicable to SC2?  I know
>>>> SC2 is much more limited in the things you can do and the options you
>>>> have and so on, I am talking about how the basic game play works.  The
>>>> reason I ask is I gave a good friend of mine who is also blind my PS2
>>>> and a copy of SC2 for Xmas and if this would help him get some of the
>>>> basics down it'd be great and I obviously no longer have it here to
>>>> experiment with and find out myself so would appreciate any input you or
>>>>
>>>> anyone else for that matter has on this.
>>>>
>>>> Game on.
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Clement Chou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, I did say in that recording I did intend to come back and do
>>>>> another one which is more in depth. I'll look into doing one for MK as
>>>>> well, when I dig the game back up out of my no-longer-played stack.
>>>>> haha. It's been a while since I played that game... I'm glad you found
>>>>> the podcasts useful... and to hear that you got someone else interested
>>>

Re: [Audyssey] SC2 and SC4 (was Re: king of fighters xiii gameplay!

2011-11-28 Thread Clement Chou
It actually has a few more modes than 4, and it still has the Japanese 
track. The only game that didn't have one was the original Soul Calibur on 
the dreamcast which only had Japanese voices. Mode wise, soul calibur has 
your typical arcade and versus, as well as team battle, survival, time 
attack and a weapon master mode. The weapon master mode isn't negotiable 
without sighted assistance, sadly.
- Original Message - 
From: "Tom Randall" 

To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 4:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] SC2 and SC4 (was Re: king of fighters xiii gameplay!



Hey again.

Ok thanks lots that is what I was hoping to hear.  I should clarify, what 
I mean by limited is that so far as I know you don't have as many game 
options available, say the multilanguage voice tracks and so forth like 
you do in SC4.  That was the kind of thing I was referring to not so much 
the game play itself.


Thanks for mentioning the no finishing moves and no breakable armor thing 
as well I can just tell him to ignore any references to that kind of thing 
in the podcast.  I actually really do like SC2 as well myself so what I 
will probably end up doing is just pick up another copy and either keep it 
or let my friend have that one and take my original back.  I actually 
found SC2 to be much easier to get a handle on for some reason than I have 
with SC4 but SC4 is finally starting to make at least some sense to me 
thank the gods.


Game on.

Tom
On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Clement Chou wrote:

SC 2 isn't actually more limiting. A lot of people, including myself, 
find SC 2 a lot better because it's faster and more balanced... but yes, 
the basic gameplay is the same. SC 2 doesn't have critical finishers or 
breakable armor, but the rest of it is more or less the same... though I 
don't remember as it's been ages since I played it.

- Original Message - From: "Tom Randall" 
To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] king of fighters xiii gameplay!



Hey.

Yes I do recall you saying that you intended to do another one sometime 
so will definitely be looking forward to that.


Yeah I was pretty happy about that myself, I let people listen to these 
things pretty often and most of them say oh that's cool but that's about 
as far as it goes so to have somebody show some pretty serious interest 
was great.  I'm not sure he's gonna run out and buy a PS3 or Xbox or 
anything but who knows.  So just wanted you to know that these things 
you're spending time doing really are making a difference and maybe 
helping get some more of us into mainstream gaming which we all know is 
a good thing.


Oh by the way, is much of that SC4 podcast applicable to SC2?  I know 
SC2 is much more limited in the things you can do and the options you 
have and so on, I am talking about how the basic game play works.  The 
reason I ask is I gave a good friend of mine who is also blind my PS2 
and a copy of SC2 for Xmas and if this would help him get some of the 
basics down it'd be great and I obviously no longer have it here to 
experiment with and find out myself so would appreciate any input you or 
anyone else for that matter has on this.


Game on.

Tom
On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Clement Chou wrote:

Well, I did say in that recording I did intend to come back and do 
another one which is more in depth. I'll look into doing one for MK as 
well, when I dig the game back up out of my no-longer-played stack. 
haha. It's been a while since I played that game... I'm glad you found 
the podcasts useful... and to hear that you got someone else interested 
in SC because of my recording is good news!

- Original Message - From: "Tom Randall" 
To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] king of fighters xiii gameplay!


Hey man, another excellent recording as always.  You kind of got your 
butt handed to you at the end of that but a great job nonetheless. 
Sometime when you have time to do it I think it would be great if you 
can do a couple more podcasts like you did with SC4 and MVC3.  I don't 
know about anyone else but I found these extremely useful and I still 
do, have actually gotten a new person interested in the SC series 
because of your intro.  The King of Fighters series is one that I for 
one am not very familiar with so I think this would be really good 
once you have had the game for a while.  I am sure those intros are 
really time consuming to do so I can understand it might take you a 
while to do this but thought it is something worth mentioning.  Like I 
say I think this one would be good to do one for and maybe MK9 as well 
since you've had that one for a while. Anyhow just something for you 
to think about.


Game on.

Tom
On Nov 26, 2

[Audyssey] SC2 and SC4 (was Re: king of fighters xiii gameplay!

2011-11-28 Thread Tom Randall
Hey again.

Ok thanks lots that is what I was hoping to hear.  I should clarify, what I 
mean by limited is that so far as I know you don't have as many game options 
available, say the multilanguage voice tracks and so forth like you do in SC4.  
That was the kind of thing I was referring to not so much the game play itself.

Thanks for mentioning the no finishing moves and no breakable armor thing as 
well I can just tell him to ignore any references to that kind of thing in the 
podcast.  I actually really do like SC2 as well myself so what I will probably 
end up doing is just pick up another copy and either keep it or let my friend 
have that one and take my original back.  I actually found SC2 to be much 
easier to get a handle on for some reason than I have with SC4 but SC4 is 
finally starting to make at least some sense to me thank the gods.

Game on.

Tom
On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Clement Chou wrote:

> SC 2 isn't actually more limiting. A lot of people, including myself, find SC 
> 2 a lot better because it's faster and more balanced... but yes, the basic 
> gameplay is the same. SC 2 doesn't have critical finishers or breakable 
> armor, but the rest of it is more or less the same... though I don't remember 
> as it's been ages since I played it.
> - Original Message - From: "Tom Randall" 
> To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Audyssey] king of fighters xiii gameplay!
> 
> 
>> Hey.
>> 
>> Yes I do recall you saying that you intended to do another one sometime so 
>> will definitely be looking forward to that.
>> 
>> Yeah I was pretty happy about that myself, I let people listen to these 
>> things pretty often and most of them say oh that's cool but that's about as 
>> far as it goes so to have somebody show some pretty serious interest was 
>> great.  I'm not sure he's gonna run out and buy a PS3 or Xbox or anything 
>> but who knows.  So just wanted you to know that these things you're spending 
>> time doing really are making a difference and maybe helping get some more of 
>> us into mainstream gaming which we all know is a good thing.
>> 
>> Oh by the way, is much of that SC4 podcast applicable to SC2?  I know SC2 is 
>> much more limited in the things you can do and the options you have and so 
>> on, I am talking about how the basic game play works.  The reason I ask is I 
>> gave a good friend of mine who is also blind my PS2 and a copy of SC2 for 
>> Xmas and if this would help him get some of the basics down it'd be great 
>> and I obviously no longer have it here to experiment with and find out 
>> myself so would appreciate any input you or anyone else for that matter has 
>> on this.
>> 
>> Game on.
>> 
>> Tom
>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Clement Chou wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, I did say in that recording I did intend to come back and do another 
>>> one which is more in depth. I'll look into doing one for MK as well, when I 
>>> dig the game back up out of my no-longer-played stack. haha. It's been a 
>>> while since I played that game... I'm glad you found the podcasts useful... 
>>> and to hear that you got someone else interested in SC because of my 
>>> recording is good news!
>>> - Original Message - From: "Tom Randall" 
>>> To: "Gamers Discussion list" 
>>> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:48 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Audyssey] king of fighters xiii gameplay!
>>> 
>>> 
 Hey man, another excellent recording as always.  You kind of got your butt 
 handed to you at the end of that but a great job nonetheless. Sometime 
 when you have time to do it I think it would be great if you can do a 
 couple more podcasts like you did with SC4 and MVC3.  I don't know about 
 anyone else but I found these extremely useful and I still do, have 
 actually gotten a new person interested in the SC series because of your 
 intro.  The King of Fighters series is one that I for one am not very 
 familiar with so I think this would be really good once you have had the 
 game for a while.  I am sure those intros are really time consuming to do 
 so I can understand it might take you a while to do this but thought it is 
 something worth mentioning.  Like I say I think this one would be good to 
 do one for and maybe MK9 as well since you've had that one for a while. 
 Anyhow just something for you to think about.
 
 Game on.
 
 Tom
 On Nov 26, 2011, at 8:27 PM, Clement Chou wrote:
 
> So.. I found this game after looking for it for 3 hours on Friday, and my 
> best buy lied to me and said they had some in stock when they didn't. I 
> played the first time today, and here's the result. For all those who 
> don't know what KOF is, here's a basic breakdown. It's a 2d fighter, but 
> the uniqueness of this series is that it's 3 on 3. Trick is, it isn't tag 
> team. You pick three characters, and the match is played in rounds, 
> eliminat