: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47129
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47129=edit
Code triggering ICE
Hi all!
Internal compiler error with assumed rank arguments.
GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47130
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47130=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
Code attac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92284
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47130|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92284
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47134|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92284
--- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Sorry I blooped while trying to simplify the sample code... :-(
The new code should ICE 10.0.0, but not 9.1.0, using either the C procedure or
the Fortran bind(c) one.
Using just the "arr_set"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
IMHO the point here is if interoperable procedures (bind(c)) are required to
have arguments of interoperable type.
My reading of 18.3.6 is that it is not required, most relevant for character
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47225
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47225=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
What seems to me a spurious error is flagged by gfortran 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 47327
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47327=edit
C code
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47326
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47326=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47060
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47060=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
CFI_setpointer does not check if it is sett
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47921
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47921=edit
Code triggering ICE
Hi all!
ICE regression proba
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47978
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47978=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
ICE us
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47963
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47963=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
When passing array slices of assumed-size arr
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47960
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47960=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
The s
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47925
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47925=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 47882
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47882=edit
New test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Looked a bit further into this and found additional problems both under:
gfortran version 10.0.1 20200219 (experimental) (GCC)
and
gfortran version 9.2.1 20200219 (GCC)
With the new test
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi all!
$ touch ./empty.c
$ gcc -fdisable-tree-dse3 -fdump-passes ./empty.c
The file just haves to exist and have a known file format.
The -fdisable-tree value does not have to be dse3
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48000
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48000=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
I am pretty sure this code is erroneous both because you
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47996=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
ICE on mismatched interface, -pedantic finds the error.
in b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Please ignore the last attachment I mixed up the bug report...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94022
--- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 48274
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48274=edit
The cleaned-up version with pointer and bind(c) tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 48273
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48273=edit
The cleaned-up version with pointer and bind(c) tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94022
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi Thomas!
The fix to this problem seems to be simple:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
index fdca9cc..9ad885b 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
+++
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48041
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48041=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
ICE both in:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.2.1 20200307
and
GNU Fortran (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 48113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48113=edit
C code demonstrating problems.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48119
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48119=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
Call to bind(c) procedure corrupts ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi all!
My first comment is not very clear so to elaborate a bit.
For assumed-rank arrays no temporary array descriptor with the correct bounds
is created like it is for assumed-shape arrays.
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48112
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48112=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
Argument attributes should ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 48120
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48120=edit
C code demonstrating problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94110
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi Thomas!
IIRC assumed-size arrays are implemented has packaged descriptor less arrays.
In order to point to them or to pass them to a procedure expecting an assumed
or deferred-shape array
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48513
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48513=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
ICE on wrong code with 10 and
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48557=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
Assumed-rank array
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48536
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48536=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
ICE on 10 and 11, 9 compiles p
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48096
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48096=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
Assumed-r
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47999
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47999=edit
Code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
Minor nitpick, the attached program raises an er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48568
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48568=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi All!
ICE with 10 and 11 on assu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94110
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96726
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49161
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49161=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi all!
Having error messages with the internal class n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96870
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054955.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49088
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49088=edit
Fortran code demonstrating probl
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49090
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49090=edit
Fortran c
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49091
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49091=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49089
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49089=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
--- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
I have tested the patch posted by Steve Kargl and it seems to do the trick.
Can I do anything to get this going?
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728
--- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi Paul,
Sorry for the confusion. I did not knew I could (should) have assigned it to
myself.
Sorry for the wasted time.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85868
--- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi All,
Still present in:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20200525
GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.1.1 20200525
GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.0 20200525 (experimental)
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95352
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
On further investigation the ICE is not generated by the extra parenthesis, but
by the use of the lbound intrinsic.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48611
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48611=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Hi All!
An extra parenthesis generates an ICE with:
GNU Fort
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi All!
Unlimited polymorphic (class(*)) arrays have wrong bounds.
Tested with:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20200518
GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.1.1 20200518
GNU Fortran (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95331
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 48604
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48604=edit
Fortran code demonstrating problems.
Somehow the testcase was left behind...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
And coarray_alloc_comp_3.f08 too.
Best regards,
José Rui
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi all!
Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs if using -fcoarray=single instead of
-fcoarray=lib.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82375
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch (version 2) posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055991.html
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50667
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50667=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
Automatic reallocation ICEs when assigning class to deri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #12 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
> Did you try to click on 'take' in
>
> Assignee:
> Not yet assigned to anyone (edit) (take)
>
I do not have the "edit" or "take"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > Patch (version 2) posted:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055991.html
>
> Please assign the PR to yourself when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055982.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055973.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726
--- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi Paul!
This seems to fix the ICE generated by using -ftrapv -fcheck=bounds
Fixes "nelems" type and adds an optional assert to make sure it stays fixed.
Best regards,
José Rui
diff --git
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50562
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50562=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
With intent out assumed-r
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50599
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50599=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
R
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50606
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50606=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
Automatic reallocation on intrin
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50600
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50600=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50601
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50601=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
R
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50554
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50554=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
ICE on storage_size with poin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100018
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Path posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055916.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055922.html
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50551
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50551=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
ICE on assumed-rank subroutine c
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50552
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50552=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
ICE on assumed-rank subroutine c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100024
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi All!
ICE with simple subroutine missing a dummy argument.
subroutine foo(that)
implicit none
class(*), target, intent(in) :: this
class(*), pointer, intent(out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136
--- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Only handles the ICE...
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055949.html
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50616
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50616=edit
Fortran code showing problem
ICE on using sizeof with derived type components.
s
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50622
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50622=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
Pointer association is lost when compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055946.html
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50617
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50617=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Associated intrinsic returns wrong results with polymorphic point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055942.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094
--- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Isn't the code invalid Fortran because it references an undefined pointer?
> If yes, the compiler is allows to do whatever it wants with the code.
AFAIK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100097
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100098
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50623
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50623=edit
Fortran code showing problem
Hi All!
ICE using flag -fcheck=pointer.
Seen on:
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50556
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50556=edit
Fortran code showing problem
96 matches
Mail list logo