Bert Timmerman wrote:
>> ARE there any "current" gEDA developers?
>>
>
> Yes, I think there is lots of patches or patch series in SF
> to prove that.
For 2010 there were exactly 16 patches in the geda tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=161080&atid=818428
I wouldn't call this "lot
Happy new year all!
Levente
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> uploaded them here (temporarily):
> http://ubuntuone.com/p/W5T/
I just receive this message:
Could not locate object
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53
___
On 12/31/2010 03:11 PM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
the effort to design populate and debug an eurocard full of 74xx is
daunting too.
It really is. The static electricity damage can drive you nuts.
don't want to go back in time...
Micros are so cheap and low power I'd only consider an FPGA syst
I have been having problems with LTSpice simulating some components
from TI. I was thinking of looking at TINA-TI spice program. Has
anyone tried going from gschem to TINA? Which back end are you using
for this?
Oliver
___
geda-user ma
Den 2010-12-31 22:11:09 skrev Stephan Boettcher
:
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
Den 2010-12-31 16:31:42 skrev Stephan Boettcher
:
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
No. That's the wrong conclusion.
Well, we'll see what will happen. I am still not 100% sure how to
create symbols in the first p
Den 2010-12-31 17:21:45 skrev JohnLM :
I actually use "boxy" symbols quite a lot. Well more on paper or with
software that has them anyway.
Well since I (would) use them myself, I'd have no big problem making
those. I'd go for whole set of lights and make few most used 74xx
heavies.
I have be
Stephan Boettcher wrote:
kai-martin knaak writes:
Bob Paddock wrote:
This is a DRC issue. The rules should allow any net to connect
to no-net copper. No need to restructure the way pcb handles
connectivity.
If different nets connect to the same no-net copper there is a sho
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
> Den 2010-12-31 16:31:42 skrev Stephan Boettcher
> :
>
>> "Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
>>
No. That's the wrong conclusion.
>>>
>>> Well, we'll see what will happen. I am still not 100% sure how to
>>> create symbols in the first place, so I guess things will
I compiled PCB git HEAD and it's bogging my computer down when I edit arcs.
Should I go back to some previous tag or is there any switch to throw
to change display of arcs cost? I compiled default, so I got GTK HID.
If going back is the thing to do, what tag?
John
___
Hi devs and users,
Subject says it all.
Patches can be found here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3148827&group_id=73743&atid=
538813
Or here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ljh4timm/downloads/pcb-dutch/
Kind regards,
Bert Timmerman.
___
Hi all,
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Peter Clifton
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 4:37 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Resistor values.
>
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:18 -
John Doty writes:
> And there's DJ,
I don't consider myself a gEDA developer, just a PCB developer. I think
the only significant gEDA work I've done is the PCB import netlister,
and that's in PCB's source tree anyway.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda
On 12/31/2010 10:36 AM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
The source of the geda/pcb manual is just a single document in
mediawiki syntax.
Oh sure, then that would be something to do with git. hadn't realized
Karl was referring to that.
John
___
geda-user m
Den 2010-12-31 16:31:42 skrev Stephan Boettcher
:
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
No. That's the wrong conclusion.
Well, we'll see what will happen. I am still not 100% sure how to
create symbols in the first place, so I guess things will move very
slowly to begin with…
Maybe your time is
On Dec 31, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:18 -0700, John Doty wrote:
>
>> Divorce gEDA from pcb. Create a schematic plugin for pcb, since that
>> seems to be what pcb users want. The flexibility of the
>> gschem/gnetlist flow is unnecessary to hobbyists. The cu
John Griessen wrote:
>> can the mediawiki content be handled like any plain text file?
>
> That page, http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Importing_XML_dumps
> suggests The data is SQL,
You have to differentiate between the article/wikibook and the wiki as
a whole. The content of a wikipedia
I actually use "boxy" symbols quite a lot. Well more on paper or with
software that has them anyway.
Well since I (would) use them myself, I'd have no big problem making
those. I'd go for whole set of lights and make few most used 74xx
heavies.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:15:45 +0100
"Johnny Rosenberg
Philipp Klaus Krause writes:
> Am 31.12.2010 16:31, schrieb Stephan Boettcher:
>>
>> Maybe your time is better invested by using a small FPGA for whatever
>> you want to build, and learn Verilog to express the logic.
>>
>> Depends how much fun can have from learning such stuff. A deadline do
Am 31.12.2010 16:31, schrieb Stephan Boettcher:
>
> Maybe your time is better invested by using a small FPGA for whatever
> you want to build, and learn Verilog to express the logic.
>
> Depends how much fun can have from learning such stuff. A deadline does
> not seem to be your problem.
>
>
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:18 -0700, John Doty wrote:
> Divorce gEDA from pcb. Create a schematic plugin for pcb, since that
> seems to be what pcb users want. The flexibility of the
> gschem/gnetlist flow is unnecessary to hobbyists. The current
> developers are dangerously pcb-centric.
ARE there
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
>> No. That's the wrong conclusion.
>>
>
> Well, we'll see what will happen. I am still not 100% sure how to
> create symbols in the first place, so I guess things will move very
> slowly to begin with…
Maybe your time is better invested by using a small FPGA for wha
On 12/31/2010 08:52 AM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
I guess I could use whatever
Why, certainly!
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Den 2010-12-31 15:40:39 skrev John Griessen :
On 12/31/2010 08:02 AM, Stephen Trier wrote:
I was wondering
whether there would be a demand for this style of logic symbol in
gschem.
Most logic designers now use verilog blocks for such logic and
never even make a diagram with visual cue
On 12/31/2010 08:02 AM, Stephen Trier wrote:
I was wondering
whether there would be a demand for this style of logic symbol in
gschem.
Most logic designers now use verilog blocks for such logic and
never even make a diagram with visual cues like IEEE symbols have.
Since much low level
On 12/31/2010 05:30 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
can the mediawiki content be handled
like any plain text file?
That page, http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Importing_XML_dumps
suggests The data is SQL, so you need a database connected with a local install
of mediawiki
to use it. If you created
Den 2010-12-31 15:03:13 skrev Stephan Boettcher
:
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
Well, I guess that I need to make my own symbols then,
Yes.
Will that be generic, light logic symbols, or 74xx series
symbols?
I don't know, maybe 74xx series, but I don't think I will just sit down
and try
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
> Well, I guess that I need to make my own symbols then,
Yes.
Will that be generic, light logic symbols, or 74xx series
symbols?
> and that it's no point sharing them since I am the only one who use
> them.
No. That's the wrong conclusion.
--
Stephan
_
2010/12/31 Stefan Salewski <[1]m...@ssalewski.de>
But the main advantage of that shape may be, that complicated
devices
like
[2]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/56/74LS192_
Symbol.png/220px-74LS192_Symbol.png
as used in some (german) VHDL/FPGA
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 13:13 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 31.12.2010 um 07:10 schrieb DJ Delorie:
>
> > here's a patch that lets you zoom out
> > more than the pcb size! Also lets you pan the board anywhere, not
> > just to the edge of the window (i.e. you can position the edge of the
> > boar
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 14:10 +0100, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> >
> >__
> > | |
> > | |\
> > | & |-–––
> > | |
> > |__|
> >
> >
>
> I've seen those too, but they are not the same as those I learned at
> school and have used all my lif
Den 2010-12-31 13:20:07 skrev Stephan Boettcher
:
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
Den 2010-12-31 02:58:36 skrev Stephan Boettcher
:
kai-martin knaak writes:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
__
| |
| & |o–––
|__|
Ah, those box shaped symbols.
Well, I don't li
Karl Hammar wrote:
> In git there is gaf/docs/wiki/,
Note, that this is dokuwiki
http://dokuwiki.org
This flavor of wiki software is more geared toward small scale
documentation than mediawiki. (no dedicated data base, less user
hierarchy, ...). Mediawiki is of course capable to drive t
kai-martin knaak writes:
> Bob Paddock wrote:
>
>>> This is a DRC issue. The rules should allow any net to connect
>>> to no-net copper. No need to restructure the way pcb handles
>>> connectivity.
>>
>> If different nets connect to the same no-net copper there is a short
>> between nets.
>
> Of
"Johnny Rosenberg" writes:
> Den 2010-12-31 02:58:36 skrev Stephan Boettcher
> :
>
>> kai-martin knaak writes:
>>
>>> Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>>>
__
| |
| & |o–––
|__|
>>>
>>> Ah, those box shaped symbols.
>>> Well, I don't like them.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:05:41 +0100
"Johnny Rosenberg"
wrote:
> So I am the only one that use still them?
>
> And why did they use a small circle for the NOT function at the
> output if the plotters had difficulties plotting them?
>
> They seems to be used pretty much in my country anyway. I use
Bob Paddock wrote:
>> This is a DRC issue. The rules should allow any net to connect
>> to no-net copper. No need to restructure the way pcb handles
>> connectivity.
>
> If different nets connect to the same no-net copper there is a short
> between nets.
Of course, connectivity needs to be recal
Am 31.12.2010 um 07:10 schrieb DJ Delorie:
here's a patch that lets you zoom out
more than the pcb size! Also lets you pan the board anywhere, not
just to the edge of the window (i.e. you can position the edge of the
board in the middle of the window now).
Great idea!
Den 2010-12-31 02:58:36 skrev Stephan Boettcher
:
kai-martin knaak writes:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
__
| |
| & |o–––
|__|
Ah, those box shaped symbols.
Well, I don't like them. So none of them in my lib...
Those were invented by bureaucrats at a ti
Den 2010-12-31 01:06:11 skrev kai-martin knaak :
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
I looked at the gEDA symbols site, but it was very hard to find
anything useful in this matter, since there was no ”preview” thing
involved as far as I can see.
You may point your browser to
http://gedasymbols.o
Kai-Martin:
> Karl Hammar wrote:
> >> Contribution is allowed to literally everyone. Click on the
> >> edit button and go ahead. ...
> > You have to be online for that.
> Install mediawiki from your preferred distro and you can edit and
> render your contribution locally without. In addition, media
> This is a DRC issue. The rules should allow any net to connect
> to no-net copper. No need to restructure the way pcb handles
> connectivity.
If different nets connect to the same no-net copper there is a short
between nets.
Consider a large item like you might solder a RFI shield to, that
cove
42 matches
Mail list logo
