> On July 28, 2014, 12:34 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > Thanks for the input Amin. One high-level question: what is the main aim of
> > the patch? Until now we have tried to keep the timing constraints to a
> > minimum (without sacrificing fidelity). In general you could argue that
> > tBUR
> On July 28, 2014, 12:34 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > Thanks for the input Amin. One high-level question: what is the main aim of
> > the patch? Until now we have tried to keep the timing constraints to a
> > minimum (without sacrificing fidelity). In general you could argue that
> > tBUR
> On July 28, 2014, 12:34 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > Thanks for the input Amin. One high-level question: what is the main aim of
> > the patch? Until now we have tried to keep the timing constraints to a
> > minimum (without sacrificing fidelity). In general you could argue that
> > tBUR
> On July 28, 2014, 12:34 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > Thanks for the input Amin. One high-level question: what is the main aim of
> > the patch? Until now we have tried to keep the timing constraints to a
> > minimum (without sacrificing fidelity). In general you could argue that
> > tBUR
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2316/#review5228
---
Thanks for the input Amin. One high-level question: what is the main aim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2316/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
This patch adds
