* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed.
* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed.
*
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2516/
---
(Updated Dec. 16, 2014, 9:16 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Hi allDear developersyou had added the Fault Model(aisopos konistantinus) to
gem5. but you didn't any info in gem5 wiki. when i send an email to writer of
this fault model he don't reply to my emails. plz if you have some info plz
tell me study those. more and less i get some info about tthis
Yeah, I'm not sure which way to go. I think broadening the definition of a
pseudo instruction makes sense, but there's a reasonable amount of existing
usage we'd want to update to keep things from being confusing. You might
call the file util_inst? Or if it's in a directory of just instruction
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2583/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2584/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2585/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset
I went to add a bitunion unit test, and I found that two of the unittests
don't compile, circletest and cprintftest. I fixed circletest, but
cprintftest still doesn't build.
circletest fix:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2583/
bitunion fix:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2584/
bitunion unit test:
On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:31 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
What's TLC and CL?
tender loving care and change list
- Gabe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/#review5547
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2511/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2014, 7:27 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2014, 7:35 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
src/dev/x86/i8042.cc, line 418
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/diff/1/?file=42718#file42718line418
We don't need this nack().
I changed the panic to a warn and left the nack in.
On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
These VNC/KVM changes are still pending:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2514/
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2511/
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2517/ (marked ship it)
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2518/
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2520/ (marked ship it)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2511/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2014, 7:39 a.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
14 matches
Mail list logo
