I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt
Yes, this duplicate paragraph in IANA considerations is a typo introduced in
-04, can be removed via editing process to allow IESG review w/o update if AD
OK's that approach or draft updated to remove if that is preferred. Alia?
I'm also willing to change to Acknowledgments (no e after g)
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Jon Mitchell (GNS)
jon.mitch...@microsoft.com wrote:
Yes, this duplicate paragraph in IANA considerations is a typo introduced
in -04, can be removed via editing process to allow IESG review w/o update
if AD OK's that approach or draft updated to remove if
In your previous mail you wrote:
Yes, this duplicate paragraph in IANA considerations is a typo introduced
= fine (the problem with a typo is authors' intent is not clear / hard
to infer).
I'm also willing to change to Acknowledgments (no e after g) which I think
is the suggestion being
Hi, thanks for the quick response. Comments inline; sections that do not seem
to need further comment are deleted, and marked with [...]
Thanks!
Ben.
On Apr 5, 2014, at 8:10 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
[...]
-- Section 1, paragraph 2:
I find it confusing that we have
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-11
Comment-on-comments below. I now have one new action item.
--Paul Hoffman
On Apr 7, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
Hi, thanks for the quick response. Comments inline; sections that do not seem
to need further comment are deleted, and marked with [...]
Thanks!
On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
Comment-on-comments below. I now have one new action item.
--Paul Hoffman
On Apr 7, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
[...]
--2.2:
Can I have more than one of any given address
On Apr 7, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
Comment-on-comments below. I now have one new action item.
--Paul Hoffman
--2.2:
Can I have more than one of any given address sub-element? If so,
Okay on all topics save the one below.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Apr 7, 2014, at 4:34 PM, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
[...]
-- 5, security considerations
I wonder if the possibility of executable content existing in an RFC or
draft is worth mention here? For an extreme example,
10 matches
Mail list logo
