Hi Pascal,
Thank you for your response. This makes sense to me, with one observation.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:11 PM Pascal Thubert
wrote:
>
> 2. The deployment and backwards compatibility sections are quite good, but is
> there a recommended strategy for updating existing deployments in
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
On 11/17/23 12:02 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I will ask the AD and chairs if they'd be willing to extend the deadline
> given the length of the doc and the intervening IETF meeting.
>
> Thanks!
> Jean
>
>
> On 11/16/23 4:46 PM, Dan Ro
tf-gnap-core-protocol (no specific version)
> Deadline: 2023-11-21
> Pages: 225
> Requested by: (System)
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-gnap-core-protocol/reviewrequest/18421/login/
>
> Jean Mahoney has assigned Dan Romas
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
to this registration document.
>
>
>
> Thanks again for all the feedback and comments.
>
> Derek
>
>
>
> --
>
> Derek Engi
>
> dee...@cisco.com
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> *Date: *Saturday, March 18, 2023 at 4:36 AM
> *To
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10
>
> Best,
> Jean
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> > Sent: Monday 14 November 2022 19:36
> > To: gen-art@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yan
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi Hendrik,
Thank you for addressing my (minor) concerns. The changes are fine with me.
Regards,
Dan
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:15 PM Brockhaus, Hendrik <
hendrik.brockh...@siemens.com> wrote:
> Dan
>
> Many thanks for your review. Please find my proposal below.
>
> >
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
gards,
> Paul
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 7:26 PM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
&g
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Hi Duane,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my concerns. I am fine with
the proposed resolutions.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:46 PM Wessels, Duane wrote:
> Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline.
>
>
>
> > On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM,
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Looks good. Thanks for addressing this as well.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Jen Linkova wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 8:16 PM Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > Yes, a paragraph in the Introduction explaining the structure of the
> document and especially the pl
Thank you for addressing my comments.
See in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:02 AM Jen Linkova wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks a lot for reviewing the document!
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 4:00 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> > Nits/edito
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Hi,
Due to a system glitch I cannot enter my reviews via the tool. Until this
is fixed, here are my early comments to draft-ietf-6man-grand, which was
assigned to me.
Version Reviewed - 04
State: Ready with Editorial Comments
This is a very well written document. I appreciate the section
Hi Sara,
Thank you for the response and for addressing the nit-comments in my
review. All seems fine to me now from my end.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:51 AM Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Apr 2021, at 10:43, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Revie
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
3AM -0800, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> > Review result: Ready
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> > by the IESG
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
> I have addressed your comments in the revision:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-11
>
> Please see my answers below.
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6:22 PM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Dan's review reminded me of one other point (inline)...
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:22:04PM -0700, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>> > Hi Dan,
>> > thank you for your review, detailed questions, and helpful suggestions.
>> > Please find my answers and notes below tagged G
elpful suggestions.
> Please find my answers and notes below tagged GIM>>.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:02 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Read
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
室-巴黎研究所数通实验室
> DataCom’s Lab, 2012 Laboratories-Paris Research Center, Huawei
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:37 AM
> > To: gen-art@ietf.org
> > Cc: draf
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Looks good to me. Thanks for addressing these points.
Regards,
Dan
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:31 PM Klaus Hartke wrote:
> Dan Romascanu wrote:
> >> > 1. It would be useful to include some considerations whether the
> authors
> >> > consider useful / possibl
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Hi Klaus,
Thanks for your quick reply and for addressing the issues raised in my
review.
See below my short comments on a couple of issues.
Regards,
Dan
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:27 PM Klaus Hartke
wrote:
> Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > This is a very clear and well-written documen
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Hi Jari,
Thank you for the answer and for addressing the issues raised in my review.
Looks fine to me by now, I am waiting for version -07 to check the precise
edits.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Jari Arkko wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Dan.
>
> Some responses below. We
gnar Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> > On 27 Feb 2020, at 21:31, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ragnar, for the quick answer.
> >
> > See in-line.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56
Ok, thanks.
Regards,
Dan
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:24 AM Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> > On 27 Feb 2020, at 21:31, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ragnar, for the quick answer.
> >
> > See in-line.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
&
Thanks Ragnar, for the quick answer.
See in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:56 PM Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you for reviewing!
>
> On 26 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Dan R
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Hi Jake,
Thanks for addressing these issues.
No further comments.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:57 PM Holland, Jake wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 2019-11-28, 07:22, "Dan Romascanu via Datatracker"
> wrote:
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> > 1. The readi
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting
Thanks for the quick reply.
See in-line.
regards,
Dan
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:29 PM David Schinazi
wrote:
> Hello Dan, and thanks for your review. Comments inline.
>
> 1. In section 2.1:
>>
>> > The default port
>>for Babel over DTLS is registered with IANA as the "babel-dtls" port
>>
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my concerns. I am comfortable
with your proposals. If your AD agrees, I would include these in a revised
version before submission to the approval of the IESG.
Regards,
Dan
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:11 PM stefan vallin wrote:
> Hi Dan!
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
that
> and generate a list of specific chaanges to the table here:
> >
> >
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties
> >
> > ...and IANA will then apply those changes.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18,
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
cern.
>
> Brgds,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 15:29
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
> rt...@ietf.org; droma...@gmail.com
>
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting
ew.
> Apologies for the delay. Procrastination and holiday came in the way.
>
> See below.
>
> > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> > Review result: Almost Ready
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) r
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
loaded. This draft includes the edits we
> discussed. Please let me know if you have any additional comments. Thanks
> again for the feedback - it really helped the specification.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@
comments.
Regards,
Dan
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
wrote:
> Replies inline…
>
>
>
> *From:* Ace <ace-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Dan Romascanu
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 27, 2018 2:23 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad <
s.
>
>
>
> There is not anything that is making a distinction on what the criteria to
> be used by the DE in the document which is separate, but I don’t think that
> is needed. This is why they are DEs.
>
>
>
> I still don’t see what you think is missing.
>
>
>
26, 2018 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments.
> >
> > On item #2:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>
>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 26, 2018 1:19 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>
> *Cc:* gen-art <gen-art@ietf.o
Hi Jim,
Thank you for your answer and for addressing my comments.
On item #2:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> >
>
> ..
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
ent, but I also want to make very sure that people don't see SWIMA as
> only being applicable in that context.)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
> *From:* Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2018 4:11 PM
> *To:* Sc
y "ensures" a behavior is
> incorrect and will fix that.) As such, saying that implementations MUST set
> a flag that only SHOULD be obeyed seems to be of questionable use,
> especially given that the specification clearly describes what to do if
> messages are not exclusive
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
> > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> 8. Section 4:
> >>
> >> 'It is anticipated that
> >> those roles will evolve. The IASA is responsible for keeping the
> >>
Hi Pete,
Thanks for your answers and for addressing my concerns.
Here are a few answers to your returned questions:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Pete Resnick
wrote:
>
>
> - 'where the IETF guest room
>> allocations are negotiated' - do we mean to say 'where
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
ceptible to a DDoS attack? Is this with
> respect to logging the occurrence of malformed TLVs or Sub-TLVs? If so,
> that can be added.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: Dan Romascanu <droma...@gmail.com>
> Date: Saturday, October 7, 2017 at 1:57 AM
> To: Acee Lindem
0/5/17, 7:05 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Dan Romascanu"
> <ospf-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of droma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> >Review result: Ready with Issues
> >
> >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General A
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
kat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Dan Romascanu <droma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
, and apologies for the
> delay in Ack-ing and responding.
>
> Please see inline.
>
> —
> Carlos Pignataro, car...@cisco.com
>
> “Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself
> sound more photosynthesis."
>
> > On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Da
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Just a short clarification on one point (or two).
See in text.
Regards,
Dan
> 3. On the other hand I am missing the relationship with other work items in
> the
>> BIER charter - there is no manageability section for example, there is no
>> reference to the performance impact in networks.
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
ne are some the comments / answer to your feedback. The parts without
> answers mean they have been addressed.
>
> Again, thank you for spending the time to read this in this fine detail.
>
> Lucien
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Dan Romascanu <droma...@gmail.com
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo