age-
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1:00 PM
> To: Robert Sparks ; John Scudder
>
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org;
> last-c...@ietf.org;
> l...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11:18 AM
> To: John Scudder ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
>
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org;
> last-c...@ietf.org;
> l...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Genart last call review of d
Robert -
Thanx for your review - apologies for the delay in responding.
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:09 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
Jouni -
Just to let you know that V14 of the draft was posted today and it includes all
of the corrections you requested.
Thanx again for your review.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 8:02 AM
> To: Jouni Korhon
Jouni -
Thanx for the review.
I have addressed the editorial issues you raised - though I will wait for
additional comments from other reviewers before publishing a new version.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 6:11 AM
>
Elwyn’s comment was:
I was trying to understand
why a router that satisfies the previous condition so that it is
legitimate for it to announce ELC with any IP address prefix might wish
to only announce it with some prefixes and not others.
The answer to that is clearly stated in the draft
Russ -
Thanx for the careful review.
I have uploaded V5 of the draft which addresses your comments subject to my
responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 2:38 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc:
Erik -
Thanx for the detailed review.
I have published V24 of the draft which addresses all of your comments (and a
few pending AD review comments from Alvaro).
Some exceptions noted below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Kline via Datatracker
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 7:20
Erik -
Thanx for the review.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Kline
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 11:30 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org
> Subject: Genart last call review of
Paul -
Thanx for the careful review and the kind words.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:06 PM
> To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis@ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of
ou.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.dir...@joelhalpern.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 1:16 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; Joel Halpern
> <j...@joelhalpern.com>; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-spr
Meral -
Thanx for the review.
Some of your comments have already been addressed in the latest version (07)
published a few days ago.
Responses inline.
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 8:02 PM
To:
Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
<ket...@cisco.com>; Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com>; gen-art@ietf.org;
o...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Genart last call rev
problems may exist.
It is a mistake to assume that this mechanism is always intended to be used as
a precursor to link shutdown.
Les
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 8:47 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
<ginsb...@cisco.co
Ketan –
“maintenance” I could live with.
“GIR” seems to not be generic enough.
Les
From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 8:09 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
<ginsb...@cisco.com>; Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalper
Acee -
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 6:44 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; Joel Halpern
<j...@joelhalpern.com>; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: o...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Genart last
> >Minor issues:
> >I understand the WG likes using the term "overload" for a link
> >being taken
> >out of service. I think people will learn what we mean. I do wish
> >we had
> >not chosen to misuse the words in this fashion. This is much more a
> >graceful-link-close
In regards to
> > 4. Section 3.3:
> >
> > 'The originating router MUST NOT advertise overlapping ranges.'
> >
> > How are conflicts resolved at receiver?
>
> SRLB sub-TLV is not used by routers running ISIS. The advertisement is only
> there for the benefit of external entities such as
anges relative to RFC 6822 are not desirable."
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Orit Levin [mailto:or...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 4:59 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-mi-bis@tools.ietf.o
onday, April 10, 2017 3:07 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Alvaro Retana (aretana); Robert Sparks; gen-
> a...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04
>
> Hi R
Orit -
Thanx for the review.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Orit Levin [mailto:or...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 8:27 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-mi-bis@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of
t: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:45 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Robert Sparks; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04
>
> On 4/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Le
Robert -
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:18 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Genar
Robert -
Thanx for the review.
Reply inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 1:25 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: Genart last call
John -
From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 2:04 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg
Mirsky
Cc: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
isis
Eric -
From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.g...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:32 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Uma Chunduri; John E Drake; Acee Lindem (acee);
Alexander Vainshtein; Greg Mirsky
Cc: m...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis-cha...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf
John -
From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:19 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg
Mirsky
Cc: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
isis
t.
I am just asking for folks to pause and think about this a bit more from an
architectural perspective.
Les
From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg
Mirsky
Cc: Robert S
ember that RFC 6823 stipulates that a
separate instance of the protocol (a la RFC 6822) be used for such cases.
Les
From: Uma Chunduri [mailto:uma.chund...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:41 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); John E Drake; Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander
Vainshtein; Greg
); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg Mirsky; Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg)
Cc: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
isis-cha...@ietf.org; Abhay Roy (akr)
Subject: RE: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12
Acee,
Relying
: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg); isis-cha...@ietf.org; Abhay Roy (akr)
Subject: Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12
Hi Acee,
the draft defines optional functionality. If an operator
Dale -
Attached please find an updated version and diffs from previous.
Please let me know if this adequately addresses your comments.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale R. Worley [mailto:wor...@ariadne.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 8:26 AM
> To: Les Ginsbe
nt: Monday, August 08, 2016 10:28 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-02
Hi,
>Thanx for your review.
>
>ISO 10589 is the base specification for IS-IS and t
Christer -
Thanx for your review.
ISO 10589 is the base specification for IS-IS and there is a reference to it in
the document.
This is where you will find details about Link State PDUs.
I would be reluctant to include any sort of summary description of an LSP in
this document out of fear
Dale -
Thanx for your detailed review. I have elected to copy the WG on my reply as
you also sent a copy of your review to the WG.
Overall, while I either agree with or have no objection to many of your
comments, most of them could be applied to RFC 4971 itself. When generating the
bis
:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2016 12:49 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes@ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes-03
>
> Hi Les,
>
> T
Jari -
Thanx for the comments.
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:58 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: Robert Sparks; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-isis-route-
> preferen
Robert -
-Original Message-
From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 7:27 AM
To: draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoi...@tools.ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org; General
Area Review Team
Subject: [Isis-wg] Gen-art LC review
Meral -
Thanx for your review.
Responses inline.
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 5:46 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-fs-lsp@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-isis-fs-lsp-01
I am the assigned
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:26 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-genapp@tools.ietf.org
Cc: General Area Review Team; The IETF
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04
I am the assigned Gen-ART
Ben -
Thanx for the review.
Inline.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:06 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-genapp@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review
Team
Cc: The IETF
Subject: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of
Ben -
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:10 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-genapp@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review
Team; The IETF
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis
of Specification Required - but your comments suggest
otherwise.
I really wish RFC 5226 addressed this more robustly...
Les
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 8:55 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: draft-ietf-isis
Brian -
Thanx for the review - I will work with Danny to get the editorial
issues corrected. Some replies to your non-editorial questions/issues:
Do you want the IESG to also reclassify RFC3786 as Historic?
If so, I suggest saying this explicitly in the Introduction.
LES: I would think obsolete
44 matches
Mail list logo
