On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:30:01PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
A final concern was raised, TMCg2 stands for (???). I've read it as 'The
Management Console generation 2'. Now from an OSS standpoint, there's no
first generation, so I'd suggest dropping the g2 designation. But was I
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which
bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be happy to accept Solr as a Lucene sub-project
once it graduates from
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:21:49AM -0800, Doug Cutting wrote:
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which
bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be
Doug Cutting wrote:
The Lucene PMC would be happy to accept Solr as a Lucene sub-project
once it graduates from the incubator.
Doug, you can only make this statement with a vote by the Lucene PMC. I'd
suggest that the Lucene PMC vote on incubating the proposal. In doing so,
the Lucene
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
Erik Hatcher myself are mentors. Do we need more?
Doug
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Doug, you can only make this statement with a vote by the Lucene PMC.
The Lucene PMC has already voted to sponsor this podling. My
understanding is that the Incubator PMC must also vote to accept the
podling. Is that not correct?
Doug
--On January 10, 2006 11:51:33 AM -0800 Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
Erik Hatcher myself are mentors. Do we need
On 1/10/06, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
Erik Hatcher myself are mentors. Do we need more?
I believe there were
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I don't see Erik listed on the proposal as a mentor. -- justin
I just added him.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug,
I saw a number of ASF folks expressing interesting in participating. My
quick take is that:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
(b) the
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I believe there were a few people from outside the Lucene PMC who
volunteered (Paul Querna did, and perhaps some others), it seems
useful to get people from other parts of the ASF involved, just to
encourage cross pollination of ideas.
That would be great. I did not
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
None whatsoever. If their statements of willingness to help meant that
they'd like to
--On December 31, 2005 2:38:48 PM -0500 Davanum Srinivas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Please review the items here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProposedChanges
Please feel free to add/modify/delete or start a new thread here on
any issue that you care about. Let's give it a week and
Hi,
I mentioned I'd be interested, I still am. I'd like to be a committer
(I think I am automatically, at least through the incubation period,
by virtue of being on the Incubator PMC), but it seemed to me like
having the entire Lucene PMC group as mentors was enough, so I didn't
add myself as a
--On January 10, 2006 3:11:28 PM -0500 Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I mentioned I'd be interested, I still am. I'd like to be a committer
(I think I am automatically, at least through the incubation period,
by virtue of being on the Incubator PMC), but it seemed to me like
At a
Doug Cutting wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
None whatsoever. If their statements of willingness to help
Totally agree with Justin straight down the line. One additional thought;
-1 / No:
- Petition the Board to require Incubator PMC VOTE to begin incubation
process even for projects that other PMC's want to sponsor.
Now, we are the Board's committee to found new projects. That said, we can't
--On January 10, 2006 2:29:25 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what I expect to see more often is that the incubator raises specific
concerns with a new proposal that the presenters are willing to remedy,
and that the sponsoring PMC didn't anticipate. That would be
On 1/10/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
I didn't list any mentors myself on the proposal because
This is as clear as day: +1.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue 10 Jan 2006 12:21:49 PM EST
Subject: [VOTE] accept Solr into incubator
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion
Hi,
+1 from me.
Yoav
On 1/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is as clear as day: +1.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue 10 Jan 2006 12:21:49 PM EST
Subject: [VOTE] accept Solr into
+0 (would be +1 but I am trying not to +1 anything which I cannot
commit time to help with)
I will use it, though =)
-Brian
On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
+1 from me.
Yoav
On 1/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is as clear as day: +1.
Otis
On 12/29/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/28/05, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I was browsing the ip-clearance documents
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/).
IMNSHO, I don't like what's happening.
I must apologise for not doing sending in a notice prior to doing the commit.
I sent in a software grant for http://www.osjava.org/norbert/ a couple
of weeks back. Jim recorded it. It had previously been voted as
becoming a part of Jakarta HttpComponents. I hold all the IP, and have
a ICLA and
24 matches
Mail list logo
