On Saturday, January 10, 2015, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
+0 then
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au
javascript:;
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
This still only has 3
+1 with list of checks as already listed in the internal vote.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 9 January 2015, 14:10, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com wrote:
T he Apache Johnzon PPMC has voted to release Apache Johnzon
0.5-incubating based on
the release candidate described below. Now it is
On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
This still only has 3 committers.
How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see
that there has been a realistic answer to this
On Jan 10, 2015, at 3:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On 01/09/2015 02:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Another way to look at the Apache Way is as a musical composition.
Sure, it was written for a
So I link to a document and say it contains the list of immutable items,
acknowledge it is merely a signpost, and request contributions.
Your response that's not good enough, h
Marvin you undertook to do the release requirements doc. You did huge amounts
of work on it. All that is
Looks good but there is one part that wasn't clear to me.
In this proposal, the TinkerPop2 repos appear in the initial source
listing as well, but are not in the submission plan.
Is TinkerPop2 also part of the proposal? Is there is risk in it being a
burden on the project? Conversly, if it
I feel this thread is about two different things. The Apache Way is not a
matter of Current Policies, but the underlying culture that drives the
policies forward. Compiling links to all policy documents into a
http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies.html, would be dirt easy and
solve that, if
The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating
based on the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn
to vote.
Here's the PPMC voting result (five binding +1 votes):
Hi,
The release is missing DISCLAIMER file [1][2] While the web site does contain
the incubating disclaimer and README mentions incubation it's missing the full
text so that needs to be fixed for the next release and probably this one. What
do other IPMC members think?
Everything else looks
+1
Le dim. 11 janv. 2015 04:51, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com a
écrit :
Hi,
+1 with list of checks as already listed in the internal vote
+1 binding
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
+1 with list of checks as already listed in the internal vote
+1 binding
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
