[CLOSED] [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

Thanks to all participating. Due to response from Datastax legal rep, this proposal at this moment considered "hostile" fork and hence no longer open for discussion. - Henry On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

With obvious block due to Datastax response, shall I CLOSE this DISCUSS thread until further updates, if any? On Thursday, September 29, 2016, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > For the record I'd be -1 as well unless DataStax chose to support it. > > I would like to give them time to

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

Thanks, it shows up as separate thread so I missed it. On Thursday, September 29, 2016, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:40 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

Ah the other Jadon from Datastax. Sorry, somehow the thread did not line up properly. On Thursday, September 29, 2016, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which other thread are you referring to? > > On Thursday, September 29, 2016, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

gt; > On Sep 28, 2016 21:02, "Henry Saputra" <henry.sapu...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Please find below a proposal for a new incubator podling, Apache > Olympian, > > formerly Titan. > > Apache Olympian is s

Re: Toree's LGPL Dependency resolved!

Congrats guys! This is great news On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gino Bustelo wrote: > Just wanted to announce that the Apache Toree team was able to work with > the JeroMQ (https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq) team to get their library > relicensed as MPL v2. This is a key

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

Thanks for the insights, Ross, Bertrand, JB, and Chris, As Alan has mentioned before, we have attempted numerous times and channels to ask DataStax whether they opposed to us taking a fork to Apache with no avail. If anyone has connection to Datastax or especially the Titan team here, we would

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

t won't be possible and it won't be > able to easy to head to graduation. > > Regards > JB > > On 09/29/2016 06:01 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Please find below a proposal for a new incubator podling, Apache > Olympian, > > formerly Titan.

[DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

or questions about this proposal. Thanks, Henry Saputra On behalf of Apache Olympian community = Apache Olympian Proposal == == Abstract == Olympian (formerly Titan) is software designed to support the processing of graphs so large that they require storage and computational capacities beyond what

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

Excited yet bit nervous to see how this goes =) +1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

Signature files look good Hash files look good NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists Source compiled No executables in source artiafcts +1 (Binding) On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a

Re: Could you grant me the access to upload eagle's artifacts to maven repository?

Michael, Both issues are closed. Are you still blocked with the repo for eagle creation? - Henry On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Michael Wu wrote: > Got it, John, i'll take notice. Thanks. Sorry for the spam. > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament

Re: Question regarding incubator status page

The expectation is that all podlings site should have "Team" page to list all PPMCs and committers. But I understand the confusion, because I do not see it mention in podling site guide [1] nor any top level guide Also, the statement kind of hint that you no longer need to update the table once

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "August2016" by Franck Cuny

+1 On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:41 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > Part of me wants to revert this, but there have been other modifications > > since. Is there any option here? > > I'll take

Re: [VOTE] Fluo Parent POM 1-incubating (rc2)

I recommend the Fluo PPMCs to go back and work it out with trademarks and the Mentors of the podling. Even some of top level projects have problems regarding their trademarks, and the incubator should be the place to learn what is needed to learn how to protect the project trademarks. Good luck

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating [rc3]

Forward my VOTE from dev@ list +1 (binding) On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Gary wrote: > Hello incubator PMC, > > The Apache Mnemonic community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Mnemonic 0.2.0 (incubating). > > Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

It should be ok. Julian is member of PPMC and IPMC, but only in the capacity of IPMC that his VOTE is binding. I think John want to make sure you recognize the binding VOTEs from Eagle dev@ list. - Henry On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Michael Wu wrote: > Thank you John,

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

+1 (binding) - LICENSE, NOTICE files look good - Hash files look good - Signature file looks good - DISCLAIMER looks good - No exe binaries in source artifacts - Henry On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Michael Wu wrote: > Hi all, > > This is the incubator release of Apache

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 Looking forward to this one :) On Tuesday, June 28, 2016, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Justin, Thank you for putting this up. This is super helpful. - Henry On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the > issues around assembling license and notice files. One of the

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

.apache.org > * d...@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org > * u...@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org > > == Git repository == > https://git.apache.org/distributedlog.git > > == JIRA instance == > JIRA project DLOG (DLOG or DL) > > = Initial Committers = > * Sijie Guo (Apache BookKeeper Committer, Twitter) > * Robin Dhamankar (Apache BookKeeper Committer) > * Leigh Stewart (Twitter) > * Dave Rusek (Twitter) > * Honggang Zhang (Twitter) > * Jordan Bull (Twitter) > * Satish Kotha (Twitter) > * Aniruddha Laud > * Franck Cuny (Twitter) > * Eitan Adler (Twitter) > > == Affiliations == > Most of the initial committers are employees of Twitter, except Robin > Dhamankar and Aniruddha Laud. > > = Sponsors = > == Champion == > Flavio Junqueira > > == Nominated Mentors == > * Flavio Junqueira > * Chris Nauroth > * Henry Saputra > > = Sponsoring Entity = > We ask that the Apache Incubator PMC to sponsor this proposal. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept

+1 (binding) Good luck guys! On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Title here should be [VOTE] Accept SensSoft into the Apache Incubator > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck guys On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the > Apache Incubator. > > Proposal:

Re: [DISCUSS] DistributedLog Incubation Proposal

t; >> being hosted by Apache. We would like this project to build on the >>> >> same core values of ASF and to grow a community based on meritocracy. >>> >> Also, there are several other projects already hosted by ASF in this >>> >> space of reliable messaging and that overlap with DistributedLog in >>> >> interests and scope. Consequently, the combination of all these >>> >> observations makes us believe that DistributedLog should be hosted by >>> >> the ASF. >>> >> >>> >> = Documentation = >>> >> Building DistributedLog: Twitter’s high performance replicated log >>> >> service ( >>> >> >>> https://blog.twitter.com/2015/building-distributedlog-twitter-s-high-performance-replicated-log-service >>> >> ) >>> >> >>> >> Documentation located in http://distributedlog.io. >>> >> >>> >> = Initial Source = >>> >> DistributedLog’s initial source contribution will come from >>> >> http://github.com/twitter/distributedlog/. >>> >> >>> >> = External Dependencies = >>> >> DistributedLog depends upon a number of third-party libraries, which >>> >> we list below. >>> >> * Apache BookKeeper (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Apache Commons (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Apache Maven (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Apache Thrift (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Apache ZooKeeper (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Google Guava (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Mockito (MIT License) >>> >> * Junit (Eclipse Public License 1.0) >>> >> * LZ4-java (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * SLF4J (MIT License) >>> >> * Twitter Finagle (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Twitter Scrooge (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> * Twitter Util (Apache Software License v2.0) >>> >> >>> >> = Required Resources = >>> >> We request that following resources be created for the project to use: >>> >> >>> >> == Mailing lists == >>> >> * priv...@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org (moderated >>> subscriptions) >>> >> * comm...@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org >>> >> * d...@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org >>> >> * u...@distributedlog.incubator.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> == Git repository == >>> >> https://git.apache.org/distributedlog.git >>> >> >>> >> == JIRA instance == >>> >> JIRA project DLOG (DLOG or DL) >>> >> >>> >> = Initial Committers = >>> >> * Sijie Guo (Apache BookKeeper Committer, Twitter) >>> >> * Robin Dhamankar (Apache BookKeeper Committer) >>> >> * Leigh Stewart (Twitter) >>> >> * Dave Rusek (Twitter) >>> >> * Honggang Zhang (Twitter) >>> >> * Jordan Bull (Twitter) >>> >> * Satish Kotha (Twitter) >>> >> * Aniruddha Laud >>> >> * Franck Cuny (Twitter) >>> >> * Eitan Adler (Twitter) >>> >> >>> >> == Affiliations == >>> >> >>> >> Most of the initial committers are employees of Twitter, except Robin >>> >> Dhamankar and Aniruddha Laud. >>> >> >>> >> = Sponsors = >>> >> >>> >> == Champion == >>> >> >>> >> Flavio Junqueira >>> >> >>> >> == Nominated Mentors == >>> >> >>> >> * Flavio Junqueira >>> >> * Chris Nauroth >>> >> * Henry Saputra >>> >> >>> >> = Sponsoring Entity = >>> >> >>> >> We ask that the Apache Incubator PMC to sponsor this proposal. >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Eitan Adler >>> >> >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

079da61bcb1f3c0c95@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > < > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/06fbcea8d1dfaa2f1e04b1d08315a3ea2c2d7f079da61bcb1f3c0c95@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > Julian > > > On Jun 8, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu..

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

Thanks for all that have voted. The VOTE now close and the result is +1 binding: Henry Saputra Chris Mattmann James Taylor John D. Ament Patrick Hunt Tom White Jean-Baptiste Onofre Andrew Purtell Suneel Marthi +1 non binding Amol Kekre Terence Yim Poorna Chandra Albert Shau Andreas Neumann

Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal

nks > Joe > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > One immediate concern is all mentors coming from Hortonworks. > > > > I would strongly suggest to find more balance mentors. > > > > I know we had this

Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal

One immediate concern is all mentors coming from Hortonworks. I would strongly suggest to find more balance mentors. I know we had this discussion about "fake" diversity stuff, but I strongly advise to do more effort to get mentors from different background than one company. - Henry On

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > Ah, I apologize about missing your initial question. Seemed like it went > to > > spam folder. > > > > Community activities happen in Twill, if you have

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

* Terence Yim <cht...@apache.org> * Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> * Gary Helmling <ga...@apache.org> * Albert Shau <as...@apache.org> * Poorna Chandra <poo...@apache.org> * Henry Saputra <hsapu...@apache.org>

Re: [DICSUSS] Graduation of Apache Twill as Top Level Project

Thanks for all the inputs. Seemed like we have positive response word Twill to graduate I will kick off official VOTE thread. Will count all +1 in this thread unless you change your mind. Thanks, Henry On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [DICSUSS] Graduation of Apache Twill as Top Level Project

Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'd vote +1. Twill has been doing just fine for a while. > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > &

[DICSUSS] Graduation of Apache Twill as Top Level Project

-with-apache-twill [5] http://apachebigdata2016.sched.org/event/6Lzt/building-large-scale-applications-in-apache-hadoop-yarn-with-apache-twill-henry-saputra-terence-yim-apache-software-foundation?iframe=no==yes=no ## Resolution to create a TLP from graduating Incubator podling X. Establish the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

* Apache Maven > * Apache Commons > * Apache Log4j > * Apache Thrift > * Apache Zookeeper > * Scala > * Snappy > * Kettle (Pentaho) > * Eigenbase > * Fastutil > * GSON > * Jmockit > * Junit > > == Required Resources == > > === Mailing lists ==

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Have fun guys! On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I thought the concern had been addressed? > > > > For Julian concern about Mondrian, the code was inspired by Mondrian but > do > > not have direct derivat

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

I thought the concern had been addressed? For Julian concern about Mondrian, the code was inspired by Mondrian but do not have direct derivatives of the code. According to Jacky, the old code is no longer used. As for Julien concern about Parquet, the design seemed to be inspired by Parquet and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] (Revised)

Forwarding my +1 (binding) from dev@ list On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Gary wrote: > Hello incubator PMC, > > The Apache Mnemonic community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Mnemonic 0.1.2 (incubating). > > Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

You are welcome, and great to have you as one of mentors for PredictionIO polling. Should be a fun project to be part of =) - Henry On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Henry > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Henry Sapu

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

the reliance on > Spark-Submit from what I have seen of the project so far. But let's not > talk architecture and design here when the project's not in incubator yet. > :) > > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wr

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

Cool, this will make code grant process to be easier =) The initial committers and mentors look great. I am sure more will come as contributions start pouring in to the project. Looking forward for the VOTE thread soon. - Henry On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Simon Chan

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

has a separate set of contributors and we’re not familiar with an > Apache approved mechanism to maintain such a gallery." > > Any suggestion? > > Regards, > Simon > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

This is great news! One question, what would happen with the template gallery repository? Will it be moved under ASF too or will it be maintained as separate repo? - Henry On Friday, May 13, 2016, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Greetings, > > It is my pleasure to > ​ ​ >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Friday, May 13, 2016, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Fluo into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FluoProposal > > [ ] +1 Accept Fluo into the Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Fluo

The proposal looks good. Bit small in mentor list but as long as the mentors are actively engage should work great! - Henry On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:52 PM Christopher wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

I would recommend getting more mentors to help. Especially almost half of initial committers are not from Apache and the other half seemed very busy with other projects. - Henry On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:42 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Bump. > > Are there any further

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Saturday, April 16, 2016, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi, > > Apache Zeppelin started incubating about a year and 4 months ago > (2014-12-23) and the members of the community think that it is ready to > graduate from the incubator to be a TLP. > > Since it's

Re: Final draft of the Incubator Board Report - April 2016

No need to be curious too much, mea culpa from me for missing signing off the report :) I had the impression I did sign off the report for Mnemonic, sincerely apologize. - Henry On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote: > Hi, John > > I think our mentors

Re: [VOTE] Graduate AsterixDB from the Incubator

ded as committers and PPMC members > > AsterixDB's community passed a supporting vote with 26 +1 votes (3 of those > were from the podling's mentors Chris Mattmann, Henry Saputra, and Ate > Douma) and no 0 or -1 votes [2]. > > The proposed board resolution is attached. > > Ple

Re: [VOTE] Release Eagle Version 0.3.0 RC3 (Incubating)

Sig file looks good Hash files look good NOTICE file exist LICENSE file exist DISCLAIMER file exist No 3rd party exe in source artifact +1 (binding) - Henry > > On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Dendukuri, Hemanth > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > The Apache Eagle

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

on N*SQL solutions, see http trafodion.apache.org > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:1

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

would find interested collaborators in the Phoenix and HBase > communities right away. > > > > On Mar 19, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks for the great explanation, Flavio. > > > > As many have mentio

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

ng it makes sense? I wouldn't > like to see any of the two blocked upfront on the basis that they are in > the same space, though. We could postpone this decision until graduation > when we'll have more knowledge about the projects and the growth of the two > communities. > > -Flavio > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

I know Apache incubator does not play favorite but it is getting awkward that TWO transaction engine for HBase coming to incubator at the same time. As most people know, the other one is Tephra, that just coming to incubator few weeks ago. As member of IPMC, I would like to see Omid provide some

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

> > JIRA Tephra (TEPHRA) > > == Other Resources == > > The existing code already has unit tests, so we would like a Hudson > instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be added > after project creation. > > = Initial Committers = > > * Andreas Neumann > * Terence Yim > * Poorna Chandra > * Gokul Gunasekaran > * James Taylor > * Thomas D'Silva > * Gary Helmling > > = Affiliations = > > * Andreas Neumann (Cask Data) > * Terence Yim (Cask Data) > * Poorna Chandra (Cask Data) > * Gokul Gunasekaran (Cask Data) > * James Taylor (Salesforce.com) > * Thomas D'Silva (Salesforce.com) > * Gary Helmling (Facebook) > > = Sponsors = > > == Champion == > > James Taylor (V.P., Apache Phoenix) > > == Nominated Mentors == > > * James Taylor > * Lars Hofhansl > * Andrew Purtell > * Alan Gates > * Henry Saputra > > == Sponsoring Entity == > > We are requesting that the Incubator sponsor this project. >

Re: [MARKETING] [DISCUSS] Tephra incubator proposal

trol system: git://git.apache.org/tephra > > == Issue Tracking == > > JIRA Tephra (TEPHRA) > > == Other Resources == > > The existing code already has unit tests, so we would like a Hudson > instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be added > af

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

mputing.commons.commons-resgc v0.8.7 [Apache 2.0] > org.flowcomputing.commons.commons-primitives v.0.6.0 [Apache 2.0] > com.squareup.javapoet v1.3.1-SNAPSHOT [Apache 2.0] > JDK8 or OpenJDK 8 (http://java.com/) [Oracle or Openjdk JDK License] > > === Cryptography === > Project Mnemoni

Re: [DISCUSS] Mnemonic incubator proposal

Looks like the discussions had calmed down with no objection so I think we could proceed with the VOTE thread. - Henry On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote: > In general, Mnemonic can be integrated into many projects. First, projects > can use Mnemonic

Re: [DISCUSS] Quarks proposal

Officially it means nothing =P But it is nice way to express interest and support to the proposal. - Henry On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > Apache Beam (incubating) did just this and there were a lot of 'em who > signed up as interested

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

W00t! On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > All, > > Thank you for VOTE’ing! This VOTE has PASSED with the following > tallies: > > +1 > Chris Mattmann* > Henry Saputra* > Tom Barber* > Luke

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists Signature file looks good Hash files look good +1 (binding) Small nit, the NOTICE file seemed to have need the year to be updated. - Henry On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Andreas Kotes wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

+1 (binding) On Saturday, January 30, 2016, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Joshua > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least > the next 72 hours, with hopes to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

rently using both a public GitHub issue tracker and internal Google > issue tracking. We will migrate and combine from these two sources to the > Apache JIRA. > > * Jira ID: BEAM > > == Initial Committers == > > * Aljoscha Krettek[aljos...@apache.org] > *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.7.0-incubating

Hi IPMCs, Please help Twill community to VOTE on release. Thank you. - Henry On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes correct > - disclaimer exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

This is great proposal. Been working with Apache Flink for a while so love to help with this project. - Henry On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 AM, James Malone < jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

This is a bit tricky and I suppose we could leave behind the GPL/LGPL dependencies that are used for model building when generating releases under ASF license. I hope that will work. - Henry On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Matt Post wrote: > I imagine so. Model building is

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Joshua Incubator Proposal - Machine Translation Toolkit

HI Chris, Good looking proposal. Thank you for bringing it to ASF. Would love to help Joshua as early committers. - Henry On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Please find attached for your viewing pleasure a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.6-incubating (RC2)

+1 (binding) - signatures files look good - hash files look good - DISCLAIMER file looks good - LICENSE file looks good - NOTICE file looks good - compile and tests passes - run sample tests notebooks look good - no third party exes - Henry On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Alexander Bezzubov

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.7.0-incubating

Forward my vote from dev list: +1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Terence Yim wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to call for a vote on releasing Apache Twill 0.7.0-incubating. > This is the eighth release for Twill. > > Apache Twill is an abstraction over Apache Hadoop

Re: [VOTE]: Retire Apache Cotton from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > All, > Based on the discussion on the Cotton dev mailing list [1], and a vote by the > Cotton PPMC [2] I would like to call the VOTE to retire Apache Cotton from the > Apache Incubator. The project has been

Re: December reports - Eagle and Concerted are running late

I am seeing Eagle is in group 2: http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt - Henry On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > I am the mentor of two new projects - Eagle and Concerted. It seems that > neither has filed a report yet. Concerted received a reminder

Re: December reports - Eagle and Concerted are running late

Ah yes, I remember now it was me as part of the bootstrap, you are right. Sorry about the mishap =( Thanks Julian for catching the error. - Henry On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu.

Re: Impala commit policy

Nice +1 =) On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Tom White wrote: > The vote to accept Impala into the incubator has passed > (http://s.apache.org/u6r), however there are still some concerns about > CTR/RTC. My main takeaways from the CTR/RTC thread are that it's not a > binary

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 good luck On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hello folks, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours: >

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

I second that. Most Hadoop related projects have this strict RTC policy, so committers from those projects try to implement it to other projects they are involve with. On Sunday, November 22, 2015, Ralph Goers wrote: > Yes, it would be good to take a survey.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion (incubating) 1.3.0-incubating (RC4)

Thanks, could you send reply with modified subject prefixed with: [CANCEL] [VOTE] to indicate the voting has been cancelled? Thanks, Henry On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Roberta Marton wrote: > It looks like we have some copyright and licensing issue to resolved

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

You were trying to comment on Impala proposal =P On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] S2Graph Incubator Proposal

Looks like we have positive responses. I think it is time for VOTE thread :) On Friday, November 6, 2015, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hi folks, > > We would like to start a discussion on S2Graph as an incubation project. > > S2Graph is a distributed and scalable OLTP graph

Re: [DISCUSS] Impala incubator proposal

Glad to have the proposal :) Immediate glance would show almost all, including mentors, are coming from Cloudera. I think it would be beneficial for the podling to have at least mentors from different org to provide bit of balance. - Henry On Tuesday, November 17, 2015, Henry Robinson

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

Hi Todd, One concern, other IPMCs could help correct me if I am wrong, for project that already open source and accepting contributions from individuals which not part of initial committers is that it needs to get the consent or grant from those contributors when moving to ASF. Unless, the

Re: [VOTE] Retire Corinthia

+1 (binding) On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Corinthia community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/odN > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire Corinthia

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating (RC3)

+1 (binding) Forwarding from dev list On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:47 AM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Hi forks, > > Apache Zeppelin community has voted on following RC to be releaseed > as official Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.5-incubating release. > > Vote on dev list: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Spark-Kernel Incubator Proposal

Recent example was the MySos proposal, it is MySQL in Mesos, which renamed to Cotton before officially entering incubator. I think it would be easier for infra if the name is decided a bit early to something that have better chance to pass incubation. - Henry On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1.1 (incubating)

- Signature files look good - Hash files look good - LICENSE file looks good - NOTICE file looks good - DISCLAIMER files exists - Source compiled successfully - NO 3rd party executables in source artifact - Source files has correct Apache header +1 (binding) On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:46 PM,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Six new Incubator PMC members

Welcome! On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm delighted to welcome six new members of the Incubator PMC! > > * Tom Barber (magicaltrout), PMC Chair of OODT. > * Patrick Wendell (pwendell), PMC member of Spark and committer >

Re: Resigning from Apache Geode mentor

nks, > Roman. > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As part of supporting the mentors engagement to codlings to give more >> attentive help and mentoring, I have decided to resign from being >> Apache Geode me

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

Kylin did have successful releases without licensing issue: 0.7.1 and 0.7.2. Especially with 0.7.1, the community did another re-VOTE to address Justin concern about license issue:

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

+1 for doing v1.1.1 to avoid re-use release version. - Henry On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Luke Han wrote: >> To >> keep things simple, the new release will continue mark as v1.1 since >> there's no

Re: Droids Podling Issue

f that helps (for both podlings) > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:21 PM Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I don't see any response. >> > Shal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

JS > •Admin LTE > •html5shiv > •respond > •Fastclick > •Date Range Picker > •Flot JS > > Cryptography > Eagle will eventually support encryption on the wire. This is not one of the > initial goals, and we do not expect Eagle to be a controlled export item due

Re: Droids Podling Issue

I don't see any response. Shall IPMC start voting to move it to retirement? - Henry On Tuesday, September 8, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Thorsten, any commentary? > > Marvin Humphrey > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Richard Frovarp

Re: Droids Podling Issue

Ah, I am sorry I think I may have missed that VOTE thread =( Thanks for the update, Marvin. - Henry On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I d

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

Good catch, thanks for clarifying. On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, Julian Hyde wrote: > I’d like to clarify one thing. I believe that the licensing issue [1] was > fixed in release 1.1-incubating. > > Issues were raised during the 1.1 release vote, and the vote may have had >

Resigning from Apache Geode mentor

As part of supporting the mentors engagement to codlings to give more attentive help and mentoring, I have decided to resign from being Apache Geode mentor. I will update the podlings.xml file and Geode incubation page to reflect this change. Thanks, Henry

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

m +1 on their graduation. Note that per the >>> > podling's status page they completed these steps on 2015-06-10. >>> > >>> > John >>> > >>> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:36 PM Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: &

Re: [VOTE] Retire Droids (IPMC)

+1 On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Droids community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/Rko > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire Droids from the

Re: [VOTE] Retire Kalumet (IPMC)

+1 On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > The Kalumet community has voted to retire: > > http://s.apache.org/fP > > This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling. > > [ ] +1 to retire Kalumet from the

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck guys! On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of SystemML > Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is > available at the end of this message and on

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML Incubator Proposal

Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have one question about the proposal, it keep mentioning that it >> could run on "Hadoop or Spark", but technically Spark can run

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >