With obvious block due to Datastax response, shall I CLOSE this DISCUSS thread until further updates, if any?
On Thursday, September 29, 2016, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > For the record I'd be -1 as well unless DataStax chose to support it. > > I would like to give them time to change their mind though. > > -Taylor > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 29, 2016 19:22, "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> ... > >> They can block a move to the ASF, but they can’t block a fork of the > > project moving elsewhere. Strong communities will regroup and live on. > > DataStax' reluctance to allow it could very easily be interpreted as a > > rejection of the ASF governance model or the Foundation itself. > > > > Yes, the community could certainly launch their fork at GitHub or some > > such. DataStax provided them with that ability via the ALv2 license. The > > ASF is not a necessary step for that community. > > > >> ... > >> Can we wait and see if DataStax is willing to do the right thing before > > shooting down the proposal as a hostile fork? > > > > My vote remains -1. That can change, based on their choices. > > > > Cheers, > > -g > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > >
