Re: [DISCUSS] Dr. Elephant Incubator Proposal

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > Why does Dr. Elephant make sense as a separate project instead of > contributing to Hadoop directly? > > What is the relationship between Dr. Elephant and the (now seemingly > defunct) Hadoop Vaidya? A different way to ask the

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu podling graduation

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to open a vote for Apache DataFu's graduation from incubator. > The > DataFu community previously voted on this back in July, 2017 and the vote > passed >

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.3 release RC1

+1 (binding) - checked sigs - LICENSES/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good - Headers look good - checked for the release tag in Git - offending (cat X) material got removed, but otherwise git tag matches release tarball Thanks, Roman. P.S. Weirdly gradle.properties is set to non-release on tag -- you

Re: Apache Policy Quiz

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 23:03 -0600, Greg Stein wrote: >> Every single question that I answered gave me a "not quite right". Even >> when it asked if an Apache product can be distributed under Cat-X and I >> said "No", it said

Re: Apache Policy Quiz

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I got inconsistent results from the same answer out of the same choices on >> the same question. It was not clear to me that many of the questions are >> “check all that apply”. > > I will add that to

Re: [VOTE] Retire Wave

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling. > > The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC > to confirm this retirement. > > [ ] +1 to retire > [ ] +/- 0 to

Re: [VOTE] Accept ServiceComb into the Apache Incubator

* github.com/urfave/cli >>> * github.com/xiang90/probing >>> * github.com/bgentry/speakeasy >>> * github.com/ghodss/yaml >>> >>> BSD 3-Clause >>> * github.com/beego/x2j >>> * github.com/belogik/goes >>> * github.c

Re: [VOTE] Accept ServiceComb into the Apache Incubator

angular-resource > * angular-route > * angular-sanitize > * angular-swagger-ui > * angular-translate-loader-static-files > * angular-translate > * angular-ui-bootstrap > * angular-ui-router > * bootstrap-less-only > * bootstrap-sass-official > * chart.js

Re: PPMC voting new committers

I'm of two minds on this: on one hand, in the beginning of the incubation process something like this certainly makes sense. Yet, towards the graduation we should really encourage the PPMC to behave more like a TLP PMC. As such they should have an option NOT to follow these somewhat arbitrary

Re: [VOTE] Accept PageSpeed into the Apache Incubator

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Otto van der Schaaf wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to start a VOTE to bring the PageSpeed project in as an Apache > incubator > podling. > > The ASF voting rules are described: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > A vote

Re: Proper way to retire podlings/madlib.yml

Ping! I would really like someone to please explain to me the role these files play. Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:35 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Au

Re: Proper way to retire podlings/madlib.yml

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:35 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:13 PM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> first of all, I wanted to let y'all know that the MADlib trademark >> transferred has f

Proper way to retire podlings/madlib.yml

Hi! first of all, I wanted to let y'all know that the MADlib trademark transferred has finally happened and thus PODLINGNAMESEARCH-125 is now successfully resolved. Thanks to all who helped in the process! This, in turn, made me go back to Incubator website to clean up a few things for MADlib. I

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:13 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari <a...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Hi all, >

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote: > Hi all, > > In regards to the recently incubated project - Gobblin, we were wondering > about the policy around renaming Java package names to org.apache.* Is it a > mandatory requirement or good to have? > > The reason to

Re: Hawq trademarks?

This one is on my plate -- but the entire plate is on hold while I'm on vacation. I don't think I can assign podling name search JIRA to myself, but if anybody here can -- feel free to do that since that's the honest thruth ATM. Thanks, Roman. On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Ted Dunning

I'll have very sporadic email connectivity for the next 3 weeks

Hi! just a quick note that I'll have very sporadic email connectivity for the next 3 weeks. This pretty much means that all the email to the lists will go unnoticed until end of July. If there's something urgent you can try emailing me directly, but no guarantees. See y'all back in Aug! Thanks,

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Hi IPMC member, > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We > kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: >

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >>... Do no evil... > > Of course. As long as everybody agrees on the definition of "evil" ;-) > > Hence my proposal to briefly document

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache MADlib podling

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:59 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Please don't forget to get this resolution up on the board's agenda. Thanks for the reminder. This is for me to do over the weekend. Thanks, Roman.

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > I recall a company that started to list out each of things NOT to do. Item > after item after item, to develop a policy. After a few dozen such, one guy > piped up, "this is ridiculous" ... It just isn't tractable. So he

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> ...Who owns release policy? I presume it's VP Legal, which would suggest >> legal-discuss... > > I don't think our release policy is

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote: > Roman Shaposhnik wrote on 6/7/17 4:20 PM: >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On 07/06/17 17:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >>>> On Wed

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 07/06/17 17:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On 2017-06-06 11:59 (-0500), Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2017-06-06 11:59 (-0500), Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:25 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> > While these are all grea

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mynewt podling

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:52 AM, aditi hilbert wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > We have had the discussion thread for the graduation of Apache Mynewt podling > to TLP open for >72 hours. All the issues raised there have been addressed. > I propose that we graduate Apache Mynewt from the

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > While these are all great discussion points, I don't believe they're > relevant to incubator only and probably should have remained on the > legal-discuss list. Ignite graduated ~2 years ago. The incubator probably >

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, Roman. I had no idea that policies for hosted > binaries > were stricter than for source code (other than the obvious effect on > licensing when you bundle in dependencies). Btw, this one is

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > If the binaries are built from the released source code I don’t think we > should restrict what the binaries do. Well, but that's not how we treat licensing for example. For example -- there's plenty of ASF project that

ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

Hi! after seeing this thread on legal-discuss: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201706.mbox/%3CCAGJoAUn-hiE89mWObh1Lb2S_vgqQJ%3DDC%3D1P_V1REQ9hUERCFog%40mail.gmail.com%3E I'd like to ask a policy related question. What we currently have is a whole bunch of

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache MADlib podling

) <xixuan.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > With 5 +1 binding votes, 2 +1 non-bidning votes and 0 votes > of any other kind this vote PASSES. Thanks to everyone who > voted. The voting tally can be seen below: > > +1 binding: > John D. Ament > Jim Jagielski > P. Taylo

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache MADlib podling

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 12:56 AM, FENG, Xixuan (Aaron) wrote: > Greetings IPMC! > > The discussion seems to have died down, so I'm calling the > vote: I propose that we graduate Apache MADlib from the Incubator. > The full text of the proposal is below. The discuss thread

Re: Good examples of licensing in ASF produced web apps?

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:37 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'll point out that Ranger graduated the incubator with a less than stellar > release history. [1] is a good example of such problems > > Oozie predates me. > > But to answer the original question, no, the

Re: Good examples of licensing in ASF produced web apps?

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Tom Barber wrote: > I don't have any examples, but I don't know of any webapps that don't > bundle dependencies otherwise users are forced to install all the > dependencies by hand into tomcat/common or something. Whether they > dependencies

Good examples of licensing in ASF produced web apps?

Hi! I advising a podling on producing a binary release that includes a Java web app (think war file). I wanted to give them a taste of what TLPs do so I went to the ones that I knew were generating war files: Oozie and Ranger. You know the stuff I'm familiar with in Hadoop ecosystem. What he

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MADlib podling graduation

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1 > (if you would like another PMC member to join to help w/ > the transition and post-graduation community hurdles, I volunteer). Would love to have you on board Jim! Thanks, Roman.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MADlib podling graduation

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > What does the (*) on Recruit Holdings mean? Affiliation of the proposed Chair. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MADlib podling graduation

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:27 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 May 2017 at 07:24, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> with my mentor hat on, I wanted to kick off this discussion >> thread on the basis of a general consensus in

[DISCUSS] Apache MADlib podling graduation

: 12 members PMC affiliation ( * indicated chair): Pivotal: - Greg Chase - Rahul Iyer - Nandish Jayaram - Orhan Kışlal - Anirudh Kondaveeti - Frank McQuillan - Rashmi Raghu - Roman Shaposhnik Salesforce: - Sarah Aerni - Srivatsan R Recruit Holdings: - (*) Aaron Feng

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Ignite - Persistent Store

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Niclas, > >> On May 22, 2017, at 12:05 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> >> Originally, the IP Clearance was intended for "block contributions" larger >> than suitable for a Jira patch file, and from

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Ignite - Persistent Store

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 2:02 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:54 PM Craig Russell wrote: > >> Hi John, >> >> I don't know all of the details of the code, but this is in regard to >> GridGain's grant via SGA of a persistent store

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Ignite - Persistent Store

Why is this request showing up on IPMC mailing list? Thanks, Roman. On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Apache Ignite is receiving code for distributed Persistent Store. > > See: >

Need a 3d IPMC vote for Apache MADlib (incubating)

Hi! any chance somebody from the IPMC can take a look at the Apache MADlib (incubating) MADlib v1.11-rc3 vote? Its been going on for quite some time and all we're missing is a 3d binding vote. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc3

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Rashmi Raghu wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the > proposal to release MADlib v1.11-rc3. > > The voting result is available at: >

Re: Podling release vote terminology

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > I've seen a few (recent) incubator votes that imply that there are two > separate, distinct votes: > one in the podling and one in the incubator general. And lots of questions > about binding votes > and carried-over

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:47 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >> >> I honestly think its time for us to consider being more board like >> around here at >> IP

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: >>... > >> I'm starting to wonder whether the real solution here should be along the >> lines >> of

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> >> I'm starting to wonder whether the real solution here should be along the >> lines >

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 8:10 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > >> Another solution is to do back door politicking where you contact IPMC >> members individually and ask them to take a look. Start with

Re: Incubator Governance Change

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > I agree that lack of IPMC votes is a problem. I don’t think that lowering the > bar to making a release is the solution. +1 to that. > I wish that each IPMC member would personally commit to voting on two release >

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Thanks Roman for the verification! We will fix the issue and keep updated > in the community. Thanks for your understanding! Lets take it back to dev@hawq where I can help you guys with the required changes. Thanks, Roman.

Re: Coming to ApacheCON? Showcase your project at a Podling Shark Tank!

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > I am assuming this is only for Apache projects that are in the incubator > phase? > > You don't want pitches for non-apache projects right? I can totally see a project that is seeking to joing the incubator

Re: Coming to ApacheCON? Showcase your project at a Podling Shark Tank!

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Roman, > > do you think it would make sense to introduce nearly graduated podling, > explaining the project and the journey in the incubator ? I'm thinking about > Apache CarbonData for example. > > Thoughts ?

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Hi All, > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We > kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: >

Coming to ApacheCON? Showcase your project at a Podling Shark Tank!

Hi! if you are (or anybody you know who's passionate about your project is) going to travel to Miami for ApacheCON we've got an awesome opportunity for you to showcase your project. Even if you don't have talks scheduled in the regular program, consider doing a lighting talk at Podling Shark

Re: [PROPOSAL] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > My mentoring cycles are all spoken for, but Superset is a great project and I > look forward to it becoming part of Apache. Good luck, and I look forward to > voting on your release candidates! Ditto for me, unfortunately

Re: Slack support?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Reference to the twitter account situation just recently. We luckily still > had access (I was the contact), but the risk was obvious. The admin email > is not private@i.a.o to remediate that. You meant now (as in "is

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation

1 binding: John D. Ament, Daniel Gruno, Bertrand Delacretaz, Roman > Shaposhnik, Niclas Hedhman, Jim Jagielski, Justin Mclean, Tom Barber > +1 non-binding: Pierre Smits, Markus Geiß > > (+1 binding votes not carried over from the pre-proposal-correction > vote thread: Jean-Baptiste

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation (restarted with corrected proposal)

+1 (binding) Thanks, Roman. P.S. This is a repeat of a previous vote. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > Greetings Incubator, > > I propose that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The > full text of the proposal is below. > > This is a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fineract podling graduation

+1 (binding) Best of luck! Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > The discussion seems to have died down, so I'm calling the vote: I propose > that we graduate Apache Fineract from the Incubator. The full text of the > proposal is below. The

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.10-rc2

CCing dev@madlib On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Frank McQuillan wrote: > @john > Pivotal Network > https://network.pivotal.io/ > is a commercial download site maintained by Pivotal. MADlib binaries are > also hosted there after Apache releases are completed > e.g., >

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.10-rc2

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Frank McQuillan wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the > proposal to release MADlib v1.10-rc2. > > The voting result is available at: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.2 release RC0

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Hayes wrote: > The Apache DataFu community has voted on and approved the release of Apache > DataFu 1.3.2 (incubating): > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-datafu-dev/201703.mbox/browser > > Results: > 3 binding +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC4)

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Ed Espino wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC (IPMC), > > The Apache HAWQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (source only release). > > We kindly request that the IPMC members review and vote on

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:15 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:52 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey >> <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: >&

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:31 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> So are we saying that the code modifications are sub-licensed? Or >> re-licensed? > > Think of each file as the result of layering

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:30 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:09 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman <hedh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I haven

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I haven't followed this issue, but if we take BSD licensed source and > modifies it (enough to claim copyright on the modifications) we re-license > to ALv2, but leaves the original BSD headers (if any) in the source. > >

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:12 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:43 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> &g

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'm personally still concerned about MADLib's licensing status. > Specifically speaking, where I feel more info is needed around > modifications to the BSD licensed code. None of that was in the legal > resolution.

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

Sorry for jumping at this rather tale -- being overwhelmed with work and personal stuff :-( As usual, John, I applaud your focus! A quick comment bellow. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of > those attempts to brand a some random piece of software as IOT :) Yeah, right ;-) > When working with hardware there are a few common

Re: Incubator wiki write access for "espino"

Done! Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Ed Espino wrote: > Hello, can you grant "karma" to the Apache ID "espino" to edit the > incubator wiki for the podling report? > > Regards, > -=e > > -- > *Ed Espino* > *esp...@apache.org *

Re: Still need sign off from HAWQ, MADLib

gt; > Everything seems to be smooth, nothing urgent at this time. > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > 1. The community becomes more open for discussion around the roadmap, > various features that committers are working on, infrastructure >

Re: [DISCUSS] publishing docker image for podling

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > Taking off my Infrastructure hat from within that issue, and speaking to > this from a Foundation policy standpoint ... I think this is probably okay, > if the docker image is named (say) u/apache/incubator-singa. We allow >

Re: [DISCUSS] Significance of Artifact Names

Huge +1 to what Cédric has said. Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Cross-posting since I missed this topic in the first place. My apologies > for the duplicate: > > I would argue that one of the Foundation mottos is "community

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Ramesh Mani wrote: > Dear Incubator members, > > Apache Ranger Project community has successfully released 0.6.2 version and > with it there had been a lot of discussion within Apache Ranger community to > consider graduation to TLP. Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:40 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:31 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wro

Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:26 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:08 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >&g

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-141) Test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Roman Shaposhnik updated INCUBATOR-141: --- Attachment: test.txt This is a test attachment from a brand new account. > T

Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing Incubator Release Management guide

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences: > > Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers > with information about what is wrong with the release. > Release managers

Re: Page for gathering CFP submissions

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:08 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > That doesn't work well from a permission standpoint. Can you elaborate? > Do you see any harm > in requesting a ticket per submission, or an author updating the ticket w/ > new attachments? Its not a huge deal, but

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Beam podling graduation readiness

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Roman, > > The affiliation for the proposed PMC members is: > > * Tyler Akidau : Google > * Davor Bonaci : Google > * Robert Bradshaw : Google > * Ben

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Beam podling graduation readiness

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > Hi everyone, > Apache Beam entered incubation in early February. Over the past 10 months, > the podling has made great progress across various areas: refactoring the > project to remove any special treatment given to a

Re: Who goes to the FOSDEM

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi at all > > Sorry for the crossposting, but I wonder who pans to attend the FOSDEM at > Bruxel? It's maybe just a possibility to meetup. Mainly after the programm > at the evening. I plan to be there, but I

Re: Most successful projects in Apache in the past 2 years

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Genoveffa Pagano wrote: > Thanks Daniel, > even generic data would be interesting for me. > Is there a web page that collects this type on info? Can you advise me on > where to find the data? If you don't need a [semi-]complete list,

Re: Incoming Website Changes

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 6:16 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:04 PM Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:06 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM Greg Stein

Re: [DISCUSS] Concur for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Jitendra, > > I gonna take a deeper look. > > My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense > solution (https://www.concursolutions.com/). > > To avoid confusion, maybe it would make

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:45 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 10, 2016 17:40, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > O

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: >>... > >> It just comes from my own experience of serving as an Incubator VP a few >> years ag

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to fill > on this one. It just comes from my own experience of serving as an Incubator VP a few years ago. What I used to do is to add proposed

Re: New git mirror created: incubator.git

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Roman, > > Here's where I sent out the experiment idea to the group - > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/927db43fa0221bcf862088d495be2d15ce433c4bd20f4de8715bb8ae@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > There's

Fwd: New git mirror created: incubator.git

What's the plan for the website migration? When do we plan to cut over? Thanks, Roman. -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:25 PM Subject: New git mirror created: incubator.git To: infrastruct...@apache.org, priv...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Ted Dunning <tdunn...@maprtech.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> >> wrote: >>>

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Ted Dunning <tdunn...@maprtech.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: >> >> > The board has motions for the following: >> > >> > - Geode &

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:12 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Below is the final draft of this month's report. > > John > > Incubator PMC report for November 2016 > > The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and > codebases wishing to become part

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:19 AM, vongosling wrote: > Hi, Guys: > > I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to focus > our design attention about RocketMQ. Also, we have removed some mistakenly > imported dependency. Thanks! Based on your answers and

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Justin, as usual thanks a million for your feedback. That part of the thread has now moved to private@geode, but in summary a whole bunch of PMC members (including myself) are now working with Pivotal to update a few pages ASAP. We're all (including Pivotal) in agreement on what needs to be done.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >