Re: [VOTE][Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-13 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: +1 binding as well. On 2015-01-10 07:07, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: +1 binding Regards, Alan On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 From the conversation with

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-13 Thread Rich Bowen
On 01/10/2015 01:18 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: This still only has 3 committers. How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see that there has been a realistic answer to this question. This has been discussed by the (proposed) mentors along with the community

Re: [VOTE][Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-13 Thread Daniel Gruno
+1 binding as well. On 2015-01-10 07:07, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: +1 binding Regards, Alan On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 From the conversation with Marko, he intended to submit this as a formal vote, but didn't use the regular voting template.

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 01/10/2015 01:18 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: This still only has 3 committers... ...We do not, however, feel that it is a barrier to entering incubation - merely something to be addressed during incubation... I agree with

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-11 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, TinkerPop Apache Incubator would start off with the minimal number of required initial committers to get the project underway. These are the individuals who spend most of the time with TinkerPop and are the ones who will be doing all heavy lifting to migrate over to ASF. Once we have

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-11 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, TinkerPop3 is a complete re-write of TinkerPop2 and TP3 does not depend on TP2 in any way. TP3 was started November 2013 (1+ year ago). We have CLAs for every TP3 contributor. We do not have CLAs for every TP2 contributor. We are primarily interested in moving forward first with

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-10 Thread jan i
On Saturday, January 10, 2015, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: +0 then On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au javascript:; wrote: On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: This still only has 3

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-10 Thread Dave Fisher
On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote: On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: This still only has 3 committers. How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see that there has been a realistic answer to this

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-10 Thread Andy Seaborne
Looks good but there is one part that wasn't clear to me. In this proposal, the TinkerPop2 repos appear in the initial source listing as well, but are not in the submission plan. Is TinkerPop2 also part of the proposal? Is there is risk in it being a burden on the project? Conversly, if it

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-09 Thread Ted Dunning
This still only has 3 committers. How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see that there has been a realistic answer to this question. On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, Over the last 2 weeks,

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-09 Thread Gavin McDonald
On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: This still only has 3 committers. How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see that there has been a realistic answer to this question. It is part of the incubation process to help

Re: [VOTE][Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-09 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 binding Regards, Alan On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 From the conversation with Marko, he intended to submit this as a formal vote, but didn't use the regular voting template. Voting will remain open until at least January 15, 2015 18:00

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-09 Thread Ted Dunning
+0 then On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: This still only has 3 committers. How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see that there has

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-09 Thread Rich Bowen
Enthusiastically +1 to welcome TinkerPop to the Incubator. On 01/09/2015 11:35 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: Hello everyone, Over the last 2 weeks, TinkerPop's proposal has been worked on with support from: * David Nalley (champion) * Rich Bowen (mentor) * Hadrian Zbarcea (mentor) * Daniel Gruno

[VOTE][Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-09 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
+1 From the conversation with Marko, he intended to submit this as a formal vote, but didn't use the regular voting template. Voting will remain open until at least January 15, 2015 18:00 ET. Cheers, Hadrian On 01/09/2015 11:35 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: Hello everyone, Over the last 2