On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 12:22 AM Rupert Smith
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 08:08, Vladimir Sitnikov
> wrote:
>
> > > You are right about that, and I think that ultimately could prevent it
> > from
> > > happening
> >
> > Can you elaborate?
> >
> > Suppose Apache Bicycle project takes the
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 08:08, Vladimir Sitnikov
wrote:
> > You are right about that, and I think that ultimately could prevent it
> from
> > happening
>
> Can you elaborate?
>
> Suppose Apache Bicycle project takes the current Elm code in a source
> form and evolves it.
> It should be pretty much
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 11:12, Justin Mclean wrote:
> The BSD license is compatible with the Apache license, so there are no
> license or legal issues here. However in general, the ASF likes to play
> nice with other communities and not have hostile forks. You would need to
> come up with a good
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 15:59, Vladimir Sitnikov
wrote:
> See https://dev.to/kspeakman/elm-019-broke-us--khn ,
> https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/native-code-in-0-19/826
Yes, this did happen... but I would also qualify it by adding that it
should have been very clear that the kernel interfaces
> If the current owner of the code base is not acting in the best interest
of the wider community, then that might be a reason for it to be considered
Frankly speaking, my experience with Elm is limited to watching talks and
reading blogposts,
however, I incline that the code owner does ignore
Hi,
The BSD license is compatible with the Apache license, so there are no license
or legal issues here. However in general, the ASF likes to play nice with other
communities and not have hostile forks. You would need to come up with a good
case to get the project accepted as an ASF incubating
> You are right about that, and I think that ultimately could prevent it from
> happening
Can you elaborate?
Suppose Apache Bicycle project takes the current Elm code in a source
form and evolves it.
It should be pretty much possible.
BSD-3 code may be included in Apache projects.
BSD-3 does
On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 13:32, PJ Fanning wrote:
> One thing to be aware of is that the license on Elm Compiler is BSD
> 3-clause license [1]. Generally speaking, the ASF would require the
> code to be granted to the foundation, including permission to change
> over to the Apache 2 license. In a
Hi everyone,
I think the ASF has proved a good home for a large variety of
different projects. I don't see any reason why a project like Elm
couldn't flourish at the ASF.
One thing to be aware of is that the license on Elm Compiler is BSD
3-clause license [1]. Generally speaking, the ASF would
Apache Groovy - https://groovy.apache.org/
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 6, 2023, at 1:46 PM, Rupert Smith
> wrote:
>
> Its been a long time since I was last involved as an Apache committer. Back
> around 2004ish I contributed to the now defunct qpid project, which was an
> implementation of
10 matches
Mail list logo
