+1
On Mar 30, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there
are no major problems.
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
updated
I did basic checking of the candidate and the RAT report and based on that I
vote +1
Sorry, that it took me a while.
Ciao
Henning
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:23, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
The Olio community has voted and approved this first binary
I need one more +1 PMC member vote to get this release out.
Can someone else please vote ?
The mail thread is here :
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200904.mbox/ajax/%3c49e60a04.6020...@sun.com%3e
Shanti
On 04/23/09 08:55, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
snip
But seriously, without these
files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf files at
install time - uploading files is a big
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
snip
But seriously, without these
files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf
Thanks for the reversal of the -1. But I still need a +1 ?
Shanti
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:20:32 -0700
From: Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org, shanti.subraman...@sun.com
Organization: Sun Microsystems
To: general@incubator.apache.org
References: 49e60a04.6020
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
It has been a week since I sent this request for a VOTE. Craig and sebb have
reviewed it.
Would really appreciate if someone else can take a look and vote.
i've just taken a look and it looks ok to me
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
The OlioDriver.jar file contains a smaller OlioDriver.jar file.
This is very confusing;
On 15/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Here is some additional information :
. The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
- Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel, Sheetal Patel,
Shanti Subramanyam
- Additional
On 15/04/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Here is some additional information :
. The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
- Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel,
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
The OlioDriver.jar file contains a smaller OlioDriver.jar file.
This is very confusing; one of the jars should be
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there are no
major problems.
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
I've just noticed that the download links for 0.1 are already in place at
http://incubator.apache.org/olio/downloads.html
and seem to be working.
I thought the release vote had to succeed before publishing anything?
See:
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there are no
major problems.
All package names have been changed to
Sorry about that. This was because of my lack of understanding of the
process. I have removed the link now and will re-distribute artifacts
after approval.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
I've just noticed that the download links for 0.1 are already in place at
Hi Sebb,
Thanks for taking a look. The artifacts were uploaded prematurely and
will be taken down.
A couple of comments below as well...
On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:22 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
This is the first binary release of
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
Thanks for taking a look. The artifacts were uploaded prematurely and will
be taken down.
A couple of comments below as well...
On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:22 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure
On 31/03/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
updated
many source license/header files and added the LICENSE, NOTICE files.
However, the RAT report shows that there are lots of files without the
correct
On 31/03/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
updated
many source license/header files and added the LICENSE, NOTICE
files.
However, the RAT report
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
updated
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote:
I'm not convinced that the license permits Ruby code to be added to
SVN.
Here is the a reference I found to the use of works under the Ruby
license:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
This does not allows projects to include
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote:
I'm not convinced that the license permits Ruby code to be added to SVN.
Here is the a reference I found to the use of works under the Ruby
license:
Since we have two packages with different LICENSE and NOTICE files, is
it okay to name them as follows :
. LICENSE_php.txt, NOTICE_php.txt
. LICENSE_rails.txt, NOTICE_rails.txt
Shanti
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote:
I'm not convinced that the license
35 matches
Mail list logo
