[X] +1 Accept Wave for incubation
non-binding
--Honza
+1
On 12月1日, 午後1:24, Andrian Kurniady kurni...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:30 PM, David Wang zdw...@google.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Yasushi Ando andy...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Wave never die.
On 30 November 2010 15:52, Dan Peterson
[X ] +1 Accept Wave for incubation
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:52, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a
+1
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:30 PM, David Wang zdw...@google.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Yasushi Ando andy...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Wave never die.
On 30 November 2010 15:52, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave
+1
Wave never die.
On 30 November 2010 15:52, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied
+1 --- the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
Wave +1 (non-binding)
--
Chris
iotawave.org
Singapore
Dear OpenNLP Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 December 2010, 12 pm Pacific. The
report
for your
Dear Jena Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 December 2010, 12 pm Pacific. The
report
for your
Corrected:
+1 Non-binding
Mark R. Kovacevich
Voice: 404-502-9268
Email: mark.r.kovacev...@gmail.com mailto:mark.kovacev...@us.army.mil
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kovacevich [mailto:mark.r.kovacev...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 3:47 PM
To:
In http://bit.ly/fhCxIt , Steve argued that it isn't permitted for non-
podling releases to depend on the artifacts that come out of podlings.
I believe that to be false, but I can't find a relevant statement in
the FAQ. Can I get clarification?
Thanks,
Owen
- Original Message
From: Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:48:48 AM
Subject: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
In http://bit.ly/fhCxIt , Steve argued that it isn't permitted for
non-podling
I agree with Joe.
a) I've been involved in a number of such releases.
b) A podling can be evaluated for license compatibility like any
external dependency -- but I don't see how a podling has any business
making any releases before their IP clearance is pretty darn clear.
--benson
On Wed, Dec
On 12/1/2010 16:48, Owen O'Malley wrote:
In http://bit.ly/fhCxIt , Steve argued that it isn't permitted for non-podling
releases to depend on the artifacts that come out of podlings. I believe that
to
be false, but I can't find a relevant statement in the FAQ. Can I get
clarification?
This
Hi Owen,
It's my understanding that Apache software can depend on other software that
falls within the guidelines here [1]. ASF Podlings, by definition are software
(released or not) that fall under the confines of Category A from [1], so it's
fine to depend on them (again, *released* or not).
- Original Message
From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:53:35 AM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
I agree with Joe.
a) I've been involved in a number of such
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:57:48 AM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
Hi Owen,
It's my
Hi Alain...
Please reply on the voting thread of Wave :).
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Alain Levesque
albon...@wavewatchers.org wrote:
I want to vote on wave project for incubator
--
Alain Levesque Wavewatchers
--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
Author of (WebSphere Application Server
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:57:48 AM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases
On 12/1/2010 17:38, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:57:48 AM
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 11:38:31 AM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:04
Hi Thilo,
The difference is that the incubator code comes from
Apache, with all the ASF IP due diligence. If we use
a third-party library that's under the AL, we mention
that it's not from Apache. Our customers can then
decide for themselves how much they trust that other
source. My
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Thilo Götz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 12/1/2010 17:38, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
... Hrm, umm, so what's the difference between this, and oh I don't know,
some other library I pick up as a TLP off Google code who claims their source
is ASLv2 licensed? I have
Hey Joe,
Hrm, umm, so what's the difference between this, and oh I don't know,
some other library I pick up as a TLP off Google code who claims their
source is ASLv2 licensed? I have no guarantee over there that the license
issues are resolved either, yet we do that all the time over
Hi Bertrand,
The difference is that the incubator code comes from
Apache, with all the ASF IP due diligence. If we use
a third-party library that's under the AL, we mention
that it's not from Apache. Our customers can then
decide for themselves how much they trust that other
source. My
On 12/1/2010 17:56, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Joe,
Hrm, umm, so what's the difference between this, and oh I don't know,
some other library I pick up as a TLP off Google code who claims their
source is ASLv2 licensed? I have no guarantee over there that the license
issues are
Hi Thilo,
I hear ya, and I believe you have way more experience in this particular
area than I do. I'm just saying that it would be nice if we could eat our
own dog food in this particular accord, otherwise, what's the Incubator
other than an Apache-branded area of code that's subject to
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 11:56:49 AM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
Hey Joe,
Hrm, umm,
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
It is common for podlings to import their code here and only then
start cleaning up dependencies that do not comply with ASF
requirements. So if another project release contains unreleased code
from a podling, it might not be clean.
In
Hey Joe,
But OTOH, it would be nice if we could reward Incubator podlings for
choosing to do it the Apache Way to begin with by making some sort
of easier mechanism for their code to be included in other Apache projects,
right? After all the discussion about making it easier on
+1
-Original Message-
From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:gian...@rabellino.it]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:09 PM
To: stonehenge-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Adding myself as a mentor for Stonehenge
Hi there,
as the stonehenge community is
Hi Chris,
On 12/1/2010 18:08, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Thilo,
I hear ya, and I believe you have way more experience in this particular
area than I do. I'm just saying that it would be nice if we could eat our
own dog food in this particular accord, otherwise, what's the
Hey Thilo,
Is it just me, or have we come full circle ;-)
LOL, yep!
We're doing a code grant, ICLAs from all current
and previous contributors, etc etc, the whole nine yards. The
fact that the code is already under the Apache license makes hardly
any difference.
Yep I've had
Just about the most important thing a podling does is release. We
shouldn't need mechanisms to ease the use of unreleased podling code.
In my opinion.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Hi Joe,
than going to some other OSS provider and then coming here
later.
You're confused about the whole point of releases at Apache.
They aren't necessarily meant to offer any promises about
stability or suitability for a given purpose, they are simply
meant as a means of getting the
+1
also when considering the other options. Some of those incubator projects are
JSR impls. And would you like to depend on a LGPL licensed external library
instead?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 12/1/10, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
From: Mattmann, Chris A
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 1:14:03 PM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
Hi Joe,
than going to
Thilo, the point is that any mentor, champion or in other form involved ASF
member MUST NOT give his +1 to any incubator RELEASE vote which is not IP
clear!
It might be that incubator snapshots are not IP cleared yet, but there is
certainly a much higher grade of review in any incubator
Hey Joe,
I agree with pretty much everything you said below. One good thing (and correct
me if I'm wrong) but is that I interpret what you are saying here:
This is not an academic question. Ask Dims how things worked for
Geronimo when they had such a dependency. Basically the expectation
- Original Message
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 1:42:47 PM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
Hey Joe,
I agree with
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Joe,
I agree with pretty much everything you said below. One good thing (and
correct me if I'm wrong) but is that I interpret what you are saying here:
This is not an academic
- Original Message
From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 2:18:50 PM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Mattmann, Chris A
- Original Message
From: Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 12:15:51 PM
Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
It is common
I've been thinking about Leo's email of the other day, and I think
that my edit to the mentor page is not right and some guidance I've
delivered to podlings is not right.
I'd like to float my logic here and see how it gets shot at.
As Leo pointed out, the CCLA has a specific section for granting
+1 Accept Wave for incubation
(non-binding)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
--
Alain Levesque Wavewatchers
Sometimes I know that the very busy root@ batches up account requests.
My OpenNLP pod-people wonder when they might get their accounts. I've
counselled patience.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Hi Benson,
I didn't see your edit. I might not be subscribed to the right list
(yet).
You are right. A pre-existing code base is not covered by an ICLA. A
grant is needed.
Craig
On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I've been thinking about Leo's email of the other day,
Ross,
I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I've gone ahead and created JIRA
issues to request infrastructure setup for Apache Jena (incubating).
Here's the parent issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3255
I think next steps are to collect desired user IDs and ICLA's for all
new
On the expiry of the 72 hours, where would we be able to hear the outcome of
the acceptance?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 Accept Wave for incubation
(non-binding)
Eelco
Hey David,
When the time period is up, I'll tally the vote and send a message with
[RESULTS] in the subject.
-Dan
- Original Message -
From: David Wang zdw...@google.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu Dec 02 00:02:27 2010
Subject: Re: [VOTE]
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:00 AM, no-re...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Nuvem Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled
52 matches
Mail list logo
