Re: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

Hello Roman, The Tuweni podling is interested. I am attending ApacheCon EU and would like a chance to present. Cheers, Antoine > On Aug 14, 2019, at 1:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi Podlings! > > in less than a month we're going to have our first > ApacheCON this year -- the one in

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.8.1

The Apache Tuweni team is proud to announce the release of Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.8.1. Apache Tuweni is a set of libraries and other tools to aid development of blockchain and other decentralized software in Java and other JVM languages. It includes a low-level bytes library, serialization

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

I support this proposal and would like to be listed in the interested parties. Cheers, Antoine Toulme > On Aug 5, 2019, at 8:14 PM, Zhijie Shen wrote: > > BTW, I saw MSR has an interesting research work to integrate MapReduce with > SGX to analyze big data in an privacy-preserved

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.1

; NB: we should address Justin's comments in next release cycle. > > Regards > JB > >> On 18/07/2019 20:28, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> Hi all, >> The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Tuweni >> 0.8.1. >> >> This rele

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.1

We miss one vote for this vote to conclude. Any IPMC member available to vote on this? > On Jul 21, 2019, at 09:13, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Acknowledged. We will fix those issues in the next release. > >> On Jul 19, 2019, at 21:02, Justin Mclean wrote: >> &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.1

Acknowledged. We will fix those issues in the next release. > On Jul 19, 2019, at 21:02, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +0 (binding) > > This release includes Category X software (which is incompatible with ALv2) > and it's not following the terms of the GPL license. While this thread [12]

[VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.1

Hi all, The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Tuweni 0.8.1. This release includes the following changes: * Exclude gradle wrapper jar from source distribution * Remove binary jar file from testing resources, recreating on the fly instead * Adding a stage task to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

l to the dev@ and user@ tuweni lists as well? > If not, we should just include them on this one. > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:51 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> w00t! >> >>> On Jul 9, 2019, at 11:59 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >>> >>> The Apach

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

The Apache Tuweni team is proud to announce the release of Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.8.0. Apache Tuweni is a set of libraries and other tools to aid development of blockchain and other decentralized software in Java and other JVM languages. It includes a low-level bytes library, serialization

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this vote as passing. > On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

We have been working on improving the situation. The gradle wrapper is no longer checked in sources, and the README has been updated to make sure folks can build from source and download the wrapper as needed. Unfortunately I missed something and the jar found its way into the distributions.

[VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

Hi all, The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the tarball on the Tuweni Download page. Note we have collected 4 +1

Re: [DISCUSS] check LICENSE and NOTICE for Apache Tuweni

I’m not sure what to do at this point. Should I make a new release candidate and hope for the best? > On Jun 8, 2019, at 7:22 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Is there anything else I need to get looked at? > >> On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: &g

Re: [DISCUSS] check LICENSE and NOTICE for Apache Tuweni

Is there anything else I need to get looked at? > On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:45 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Thanks Justin. > >> On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:30, Justin Mclean wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> If that’s no trouble, I’d rather have the text inlined and

Re: [DISCUSS] check LICENSE and NOTICE for Apache Tuweni

Thanks Justin. > On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:30, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> If that’s no trouble, I’d rather have the text inlined and in the LICENSE >> file. Please let me know if that’s a problem. > > No issue it can be done either way. I won’t be able to do a full check until > later

Re: late learnings, which could be helpful for all mentors to know

Thanks Adrian, this is all good to know. > On Jun 4, 2019, at 9:21 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: > > Hi, all. > > Through Zipkin's incubation, I noticed that knowledge of state of the > art is not equally distributed. Some voting approaches already in use > aren't known. Also what you can use to

Re: [DISCUSS] check LICENSE and NOTICE for Apache Tuweni

If that’s no trouble, I’d rather have the text inlined and in the LICENSE file. Please let me know if that’s a problem. I updated the LICENSE file. Please kindly review [0] and [1] and let me know if this is acceptable. [0]:https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/blob/master/LICENSE

Re: [DISCUSS] check LICENSE and NOTICE for Apache Tuweni

OK, I inlined the MIT license texts from the various dependencies. Does this look better? The CC0 dependencies are public domain. Do you have an example of dealing with public domain dependencies? > On Jun 2, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > When use the short form of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

Thanks. I did some research and removed the gradle wrapper just now. > On Jun 2, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >>> The two archives in the source release make sense as exceptions. A >>> rewritten README.md would explain the gradle wrapper. > > One does as it contains no

[DISCUSS] check LICENSE and NOTICE for Apache Tuweni

Folks, Would you please kindly review the NOTICE [0] and LICENSE [1] files for Apache Tuweni? Feedback is very welcome. Thanks, Antoine [0]:https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/blob/master/LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

24 AM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> >> I could not find the disclaimer from >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers anywhere in >> the release. >> >> Kenn >> >> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

OK thanks for the review. I have applied some of the fixes here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tuweni/commit/fa12f390165559a4afaf522c02672adbcd9dfb67 I’ll open another thread to discuss. > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

OK, the vote is now closed. The vote does not pass with 2 -1 votes from Dave Fisher and Justin Mclean. Thank you all for your feedback. I will take you up on the offer of helping draw the release. > On May 31, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> This class is not GPL. It

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

Hi Justin, This class is not GPL. It was written by me. It is based on the ProgPoW algorithm specification. That specification is licensed CC0, scroll to the bottom of the README please: https://github.com/ifdefelse/ProgPOW/blob/master/README.md I’ll address the other points separately. > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

ease. > > Kenn > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> Hello IPMC, >> >> The Apache Tuweni community has voted on and approved a proposal to >> release Apache Tuweni (incubating) version 0.7.0. >> >> The voting thr

[VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

Hello IPMC, The Apache Tuweni community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Tuweni (incubating) version 0.7.0. The voting thread can be found here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/65cc15293b9bc3598d0c3ca8ba4f7dbc402b6064372c14f0fae0d295@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E Two

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

Please disregard… I meant to open a vote for IPMC to vote on the release. I’ll resend. > On May 28, 2019, at 11:16 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > > The vote to release Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0 passed with four +1 > binding votes: > > Jim Jagielsk

[VOTE] Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0

Hi all, The vote to release Apache Tuweni (incubating) 0.7.0 passed with four +1 binding votes: Jim Jagielski Jonny Rhea Antoine Toulme Larry McCay Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/65cc15293b9bc3598d0c3ca8ba4f7dbc402b6064372c14f0fae0d295@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E <ht

Re: Setting up Tuweni

vate@ list. The moderator will need to make sure that > they have their apache account already and are either a Mentor or an Initial > Committer. > > Once people are subscribed to the dev@ list we can continue the discussion > there. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Mar 29,

Re: Setting up Tuweni

Awesome, thanks! > On Mar 29, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Antoine, > > The repos is now created. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Mar 29, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> The ticket was closed with this message: &

Re: Setting up Tuweni

28, 2019, at 10:49 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Never mind, I read the dos again and opened an infra ticket to open the git > repository. > >> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:13 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> Following up: >> >> The DNS and LDAP request

Re: Setting up Tuweni

Never mind, I read the dos again and opened an infra ticket to open the git repository. > On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:13 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Following up: > > The DNS and LDAP requests are fulfilled. Using the self-serve portal I have > requested mailing lists

Re: Setting up Tuweni

/setup/newrepo.html <https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/newrepo.html> Would a mentor or someone with the appropriate credentials fill that form please? Cheers, Antoine > On Mar 26, 2019, at 4:43 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have added Tuweni to podlings,x

Re: Setting up Tuweni

Should I take further action to have infra's attention regarding [1]? I believe there is a good process for that. > On Mar 26, 2019, at 4:43 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have added Tuweni to podlings,xml [0]. > I have also started tasks with infra to set

Re: Setting up Tuweni

PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi Antoine, >> >> The podlings.xml change looks good to me. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 26, 2019, at 4:43 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >>> >>> Hi a

Setting up Tuweni

Hi all, I have added Tuweni to podlings,xml [0]. I have also started tasks with infra to set up DNS and LDAP [1]. Please review and let me know if you see additional actions that may be taken. I will request mailing lists, git repository and websites after DNS is granted. Cheers, Antoine

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

I kept messing that one up. Apologies. > On Mar 25, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > Correction. VP, Brand approved the name. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Mar 25, 2019, at 10:13 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> Legal has appr

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Legal has approved the name. We are a go with Apache Tuweni. Thanks to all for helping figure this riddle out, and the many colors we painted this bike shed together :D Antoine > On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:57 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I have filed https://issues.apache.org/ji

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-167 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-167> for this name. > On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:46 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > “Qui ne dit mot consent”. I haven’t heard anyone say no, so

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

“Qui ne dit mot consent”. I haven’t heard anyone say no, so this name gets to the next round. Cheers, Antoine > On Mar 21, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Any strong objections to Tuweni? > > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 12:04 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >>

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Any strong objections to Tuweni? > On Mar 21, 2019, at 12:04 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I’m not sure about avac, doesn’t roll off the tongue. > > On the theme of “no one”, I found Tuweni (from > https://www.lakotadictionary.org/phpBB3/nldo.php > <https://www.lak

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

There is already a bistro project: https://facebook.github.io/bistro/ > On Mar 21, 2019, at 11:06 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > This deeply appeals to my French roots. > > OK I’ll check we’re not infringing anything. > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Jim Jagielski

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

This deeply appeals to my French roots. OK I’ll check we’re not infringing anything. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > How about Apache Bistro: > > o sounds like crypto > o Blockchain dISTRO > o distributed kinda means decentralized as well. > > > >

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

:o)) > > best regards, > juan pablo > > > El jue., 21 mar. 2019 8:04, Antoine Toulme escribió: > >> I’m not sure about avac, doesn’t roll off the tongue. >> >> On the theme of “no one”, I found Tuweni (from >> https://www.lakotadictionary.org/

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

gt; Apache Avac ??? > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:57 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> There exists an outis open source project. >> >> Maybe we can riff on this name though. >> >>> On Mar 20, 2019, at 11:39, Kenneth Knowles wrote: >>> >&

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

does not violate any trademarks >> or claims. >> --Anu >> >> Just kidding, eventually I am sure you will find a good name, -- that no >> one else has thought off. >> >> >> On 3/20/19, 10:51 AM, "Antoine Toulme" wrote: >> &g

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Deep sigh. OK. > On Mar 20, 2019, at 9:15 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > I did find this, https://github.com/RainBlock. Looks like code around > ethereum. Maybe too close? > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:59 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> Yes, you’ve be

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Yes, you’ve been very flexible, thank you. Anybody with strong opinions, please chime in. I’ll start looking for marks around rainblock. > On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Personally, I'm fine w/ anything... > >> On Mar 19, 2019, at 6:53 PM, Ant

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

> Mike >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:19 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> What is somewhat funny is that the "SkyWalking" podling is on the cusp of >>> graduation. :) >>> >>>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:42 AM, Antoi

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

efore agreed to look for a different name. We need to pick another name. > On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:32 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > >> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:10 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: &g

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Jagielski wrote: >> >> Thx. We'll wait for the decision. >> >>> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:05 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >>> >>> The ticket is now open: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165 >>> >>> Chee

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

The ticket is now open: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165 Cheers, Antoine > On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Perfect, thank you. > >> On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> Antoine Toulme wrote on

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Perfect, thank you. > On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 15:09:39 -0800: >> I am happy to mention that you mentioned this term on list. > > Thanks. > >> What language should I use? > > T

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hello Daniel, I am happy to mention that you mentioned this term on list. Are you inferring something? What language should I use? > On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Antoine Toulme wrote on Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 09:10:08 -0800: >> I’ll open a pooling nam

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

name search ticket for Obiwarn and will test the waters over there. Meanwhile, if you have a strong objection, please let it be known here. Cheers, Antoine > On Mar 1, 2019, at 4:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > either works for me. > >> On Feb 28, 2019, at 6:07 PM, Ant

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

://stackoverflow.com/search?q=obiwarn 0 results LinkedIn: No hits No matches in Oxford dictionary: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary=obiwarn No matches on Spotify. > On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:07 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I’ll change my vote. > > +1 to Obiwarn. >

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:11 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >>> +1 for Bava. Checking usage now. >>> >>> https://github.com/search?o=desc=bava >>> No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists. >>> >>> Google code: >

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

+1 for Bava. Checking usage now. https://github.com/search?o=desc=bava No repo using the name or active. Most repos hobbyists. Google code: https://opensource.google.com/projects/search?q=bava No hits Sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:mac/?q=bava No hits Openhub:

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

FWIW I am very happy I received strong signal that this was not going to work, in a timely manner. No worries and let’s move on. > On Feb 28, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> >> On 2/28/2019 3:24 PM, Daniel Gruno

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

ief of it needs to change. > > But I am here to support and feel bad to throw any gunk in your sprockets. > > Best, KAM > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 13:59 Antoine Toulme >> For context Jim is the champion of the Cava proposal. >> >> The point of rough consensus is to

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

ee/2017/jul/02/brands-rainbow-queasy-but-bring-lgbt-lives-into-mainstream-skittles-gay >>>> >>>> 2 - I cannot speak for the LGBTQ community and I support them so I would >>>> say rainbow would be something I would avoid. >>>> >>>&g

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

objections. At this time, I’d like to push for the name rainbow. Any objections? > On Feb 26, 2019, at 10:10 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS projects > with those names. > > I personally would like to vouch for Ra

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

I ran searches for rainbow, sprocket and winch and didn’t find OSS projects with those names. I personally would like to vouch for Rainbow. It does fit the whimsical requirement of Apache project names. > On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 2/26/2019 6:24 PM, Kenneth

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Jal (just another language) is a > programming language:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JAL_(compiler) & > http://justanotherlanguage.org/ > > I don't think it's going to be appropriate for us to step on another > open source project name. > > Regards, > KAM > > On 2/

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

ean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 for Jal > > Regards > JB > > On 22/02/2019 23:47, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have opened a thread to vote the Cava proposal into the incubator [0]. >> >> At the same time, I have engaged with the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

Thank you everyone, Antoine [0]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7087791b1540363aef260a5f9c864a218c9f72bdd8cdf3bd90faad46@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the C

[Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hi all, I have opened a thread to vote the Cava proposal into the incubator [0]. At the same time, I have engaged with the list on searching a better name for the project [1]. Out of this initial thread, we have singled out a list of names. Here are the names: - Rainbow (after the name of my

[VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in [2]. I will kick off a vote to pick a name based on the proposals made there. According to the

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

software comp[any >> called kava.io <http://kava.io/>. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> +1 keeping as-is. >>> >>>> On Feb 18, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Antoine Toulm

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

name search for the above :) >> >> Regards, >> Serge... >> >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:32 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> Consensus Java :) >>> >>>> On Feb 16, 2019, at 1:59 PM, Antoine Toulme >> wrote: >>>&g

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

able name? > > If there is a concern about trademarked name, the community can always go > with Apache Cava name. > > - Henry > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 5:21 PM Antoine Toulme >> Thank you Anu. >> >> I’ll add your proposal to mine and start a vote Monday if

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

n that reflection. And so ad infinitum. That is the Buddhist conception of > the universe in an image." –Alan Watts[1] > > And for what it is worth, it is the ultimate connected chain or graph ( > > --Anu > > > > > > On 2/13/19, 10:58 AM, "

[Cava] Suitable name search

Hello all, As discussed previously, Cava is not a proper name for the proposal discussed last week on this list and published to the wiki [0]. I humbly would like to ask the community for feedback and proposals on a suitable name for this proposal, in line with the guidelines [1]. In

Re: Suitable project name search (was: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava)

gt;, committer > Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org/>, contributor (without privileges) > since 2008 > Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org/>, committer > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:34 PM Antoine Toulme <mailto:anto...@toulme.name>> wrote: > Hi Pie

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

mentor too. > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:10 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> All, thank you for your expressions of interest. >> >> I have listed all names reported here and a few more colleagues and >> contributors in

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

> On Feb 6, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher >> wrote: Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

odion.apache.org>, Vice President & PMC > Chair* > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges) > sinc

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

s. [1] > > Regards, > Dave > > [1] https://winefolly.com/hidden/what-is-cava/ > >> On Feb 5, 2019, at 4:01 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> Thanks for your interest, all. >> >> Yes, the name of the project will very likely change. >> >&

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

oned above. Would the project be OK with moving >>>> discussions to a mailing list and having them in an asynchronous manner? >>>> >>>>> We will remain in incubation for a period of no less than a year so we >>>> can properly invest and build a

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

ters >> around our goals. > > Most projects take more than a year to graduate, two years is usual but some > projects do take longer. Is the project OK with that and will your mentors > stay around for that long? I’m OK with this. Will update. > >> '''Initial Committer

[PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

s from there and elsewhere actively. The goal of this thread is engage with the community and gather interest for participation in the project. Please let us know what you think! Cheers, Antoine Toulme == Abstract == Cava is a set of libraries and other tools to aid development of bloc

Write access to wiki

Hello folks, Would it be possible to gain write access to the incubator wiki? My username is “Antoine Toulme”. Thanks! Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

<    1   2