Leo Simons wrote:
I have no idea what might be going on in your head, but from where I
sit, it seems like you might be overreacting just a _bit_ to a
tongue-in-cheek e-mail post script. Have some green tea.
There were also some suggestions about us making a release for the sake
of making a
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Yes, *AND* ensuring legal dots are put on the i's and j's. This is
done through checking the release and ensuring that it is in adherence
to our policies which you and others have crafted. *All* podlings have
to ensure they have the correct licensing headers, notices
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote:
I gave counsel to the Eclipse Foundation and explained that they could
provide a fully functioning JavaHL library to users with only EPL
compatible code. Basically, you just need to build without Neon, BDB
and libintl support. Of the
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL
Well... the problem is that an svn mv from /incubator/subversion/ to
/subversion/ introduces an artificial breakage in the history. It is
actually quite disruptive for tracking history (which
Igor Burilo wrote:
Mark Phippard-3 wrote:
I gave counsel to the Eclipse Foundation and explained that they could
provide a fully functioning JavaHL library to users with only EPL
compatible code. Basically, you just need to build without Neon, BDB
and libintl support. Of the three, the
Eric Evans wrote:
Sure, but the IPMC is in a position of power, and can impose it's will
upon the project (including CTR vs. RTC), right?
I have no clue whether the IPMC can impose such a decision. But I'm
very, very certain that it should not even consider trying. It's better
to ask the
Ralph Goers wrote:
In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is completely possible
to create a separate jar containing the
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
I don't quite understand the point of this. Here we are with a Java
wrapper library for the Subversion APIs. The versioning rules that apply
to it are the same as for the rest of Subversion -- in other
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
fyi, Subversion has been migrated into the ASF repository. About 30+
committers have access and are beginning work within the ASF repo.
Below, you can see the big change to switch the licensing over
Branko Čibej wrote:
I'm testing the Subversion build now to see if it works with APR's
install.sh, and will switch over if everything appears to be OK.
Unfortunately, it's not a drop-in replacement. I'm sure it could be made
to work, though.
-- Brane
sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is a release blocker
sebb wrote:
Not relevant - the discussion is about what archives are supported by
the OS, not the development process.
I thought it was about which archive formats an ASF release should be
distributed in. All I ever recall reading in policy documents are
requirements about the /contents/ of
Doug Cutting wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I would prefer what I say isn't distorted by selective editing.
Sorry, that was not my intent.
I'm not talking about the website in general. I'm talking specifically
about publishing content primarily intended for inclusion in
releases. Would
sebb wrote:
On 03/12/2009, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
We tend to update the api docs generated using doxygen and java doc on
a nightly basis.
Unreleased artifacts should
Todd Volkert wrote:
Does anyone on this list know of an existing open source pure-Java Advanced
Audio Coding (AAC) library? If not, are there any audiophiles on this list
that would be interested in incubating such a project with me? :) Do you
know of any barriers to such a project (like
Doug Cutting wrote:
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I suspect that renaming /docs/trunk/ to /docs/dev/ would be
sufficient and
follow this best practice?
I don't know how much folks look at the URL, but I think I've heard
Roy indicate that all developer-specific stuff should be under a dev/
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Having 3 Sean's all working simultaneously on the same project
would be unprecedented, and probably violates some Incubator rule
on diversity. 2 Sean's is the max we could accept come
graduation time.
You could try renaming one of them to Shaun, and if that's still
On 30.01.2014 21:16, Kowalski, Francois-Xavier wrote:
My $0.1: stick with the language rather than with the platform:
Because it's well-known that API implementations are never
platform-specific. :)
*-js/
*-objc/
*-cs/
—FiX
-Original Message-
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
On 26.08.2014 00:24, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
This strikes me very similar to providing access to daily SNAPSHOT binary
artifacts. I would argue that labeling it appropriately is all you
need.
Except that is this case the intended audience of the application is users.
Bloodhound has
On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote:
This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope
Dear Bloodhound developers,
After co-ordinating with Greg and Hyrum, I've volunteered to be the
third incubator mentor for Bloodhound. I hope you won't find my efforts
too onerous.
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 07.08.2012 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
the IPMC members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin.
This is an unreasonable request. The IPMC voted on the 3.4.0 release.
The notice file has not changed between 3.4.0 and 3.4.1. How then do you
justify this new requirement?
It is not fair to the
On 21.08.2012 17:29, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough
On 26.08.2012 13:15, Tim Williams wrote:
Marvin gave the link earlier in this thread. 4th para is the relevant bit.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
The relevant part is in the last paragraph. However, that says
convenience and defines version numbering requirements, but it does
On 26.08.2012 16:46, Joe Schaefer wrote:
The point most people seem to make out of sanctioned
or official builds revolves around indemnifying volunteers
involved in the production of the release.
I'm tired of rehashing release.html for the umpteenth time
simply because Brane or you or some
On 26.08.2012 17:04, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Waah Brane- obviously you're not as community-oriented
as you'd like to think. release.html is the byproduct
of several years of writing oriented towards the lowest
common denominator of the org, but if you think you know
how to improve it you have
On 08.10.2012 13:44, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 8:54 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: key signing
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Jukka Zitting
On 08.10.2012 17:43, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
What guarantee do you have that a particular Skype ID is whoever you
think it is? None at all, unless the person involved looked at your
Skype contact list and said, yeah, that's me
On 10.10.2012 00:01, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
While this protocol does not rely heavily on validating
government-issued IDs, the Debian guidelines quoted above point out
that some people object to giving such IDs too much creedence:
So instead of giving too much credence to government-issued
On 29.10.2012 15:22, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC.
The result of the vote is summarised here:
On 10.11.2012 14:39, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Apologies for the delay, the conference wifi was taken down before I could
send the e-mail.
Unfortunately, when I ran a license header check, the report came back
with some minified css js files in the source release. As far as I am
aware,
On 19.11.2012 13:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi all,
we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion Apache
Marmotta as a new name. We looked a bit and the
On 26.11.2012 16:59, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC.
The result of the vote is summarised here:
It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
tarball from a podling.
Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release
every couple weeks; yet the 0.2 vote thread sat in general@ for
On 01.12.2012 08:37, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Joachim Dreimann
joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the third release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
On 01.12.2012 15:06, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails
about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release
tarball from a podling.
Reviewing
On 01.12.2012 16:00, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Make every vote a bugzilla issue, and use the existing script that mails
an issue summary once a week?
That's certainly one thing I considered.
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 04.12.2012 06:35, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Benson,
I agree. There was some progress in mavenizing the build. I suspect that
that solution will take some time. The build process is somewhat
complicated at the moment, if this is the long term solution, we may need
to do something simpler
I find myself unable, as a Bloodhound mentor, to sign off their report
for December. Can I please get karma to edit the Incubator wiki? My
wiki username is brane.
Thanks,
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 11.12.2012 23:21, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jukka Zitting: Bloodhound
The report looks pretty good - they've added a few new committers and
cut some releases after their previous report. The report, like the
On 12.12.2012 03:22, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Also - there's a fairly new startup in San Francisco area going by the same
name Bloodhound (see http://bloodhound.com/). I'm not associated with them,
just happened to hear about them. It's obviously not in the same business
but given how Apache
On 27.12.2012 08:41, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello Christian,
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marcel,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
-1 Because: The release now is a ZIP file, and
On 02.01.2013 01:09, Benson Margulies wrote:
Hi there.
In the process of cleaning up photark, I noticed that very few
incubating projects have DOAP files.
At the risk of appearing a total idiot (as if I usually don't), I have
to ask: what is a DOAP file and what is it good for?
-- Brane
Following the discussions on members@ and comdev, the Apache Bloodhound
developers have decided[1] to relax the ACL governing access to the
Bloodhound code so that as of now, any ASF committer has commit access.
Of course this does not waive potential contributors' duty to engage
with the
On 18.01.2013 11:39, sebb wrote:
On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos ryan.ol...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
(incubating)
in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
The vote PPMC vote
On 23.01.2013 18:42, Gary Martin wrote:
Regarding the original suggestion, a web based tool would only seem to
be useful if the problem is associated with IPMC members not noticing
rather than not feeling that they have time to do proper reviews.
That's a fair point. Still, I've decided to
A while ago I proposed we should have a status page showing current
pending votes.
To this end I've begun writing a simple script that parses the
general@incubator Atom feed from Markmail and creates a static web page
with information gleaned from there (it keeps longer-term data in a
SQLite
On 24.01.2013 06:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
and doesn't seem to be at all complete; that's
reckon.
Cheers,
Joe
On 24 January 2013 04:05, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
A while ago I proposed we should have a status page showing current
pending votes.
To this end I've begun writing a simple script that parses the
general@incubator Atom feed from Markmail and creates a static
On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't
On 24.01.2013 22:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
I've noticed before that our archives seem to be incomplete, and
indeed it appears that the mbox files contain only messages To: a
list, everything that actually gets delivered to subscribers by the
list server.
I meant to say, /not/ everything
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks
On 25.01.2013 01:50, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
...
I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
general@. This solved
On 25.01.2013 16:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I'll bet that Ryan isn't subscribed
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.org
On 26.01.2013 00:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a field to it we can.
Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch
metadata is in general good enough, since if clutch can generate
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a field to it we can.
Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator
On 28.01.2013 08:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled
On 28.01.2013 10:01, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Branko!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
needs to be updated?
yes, we published the status page before we got the MLs addresses
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
need to
On 29.01.2013 17:23, sebb wrote:
On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
The page is updated every 4 hours.
-- Brane
On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated
On 31.01.2013 15:12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
know if we can have the page regenerated more often
On 01.02.2013 08:56, Mahadev Konar wrote:
Closing the vote since its past 72 hours.
The vote passes with 4 IPMC +1's. Will do the needful to push the release out.
The first needful is to send a proper [RESOLVED][VOTE] mail :)
-- Brane, quite touchy on the subject after writing the votes
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
know if we
On 31.01.2013 14:13, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded
Thanks for the reminder.
On 01.02.2013 16:42, sebb wrote:
Please remember to publish the site after committing updates.
On 1 February 2013 12:49, br...@apache.org wrote:
Author: brane
Date: Fri Feb 1 12:49:29 2013
New Revision: 1441429
URL:
On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated into (a copy
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting
On 01.02.2013 20:48, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
The only supported way to get content to the web
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for reminding me again ... silly me.
change the incubator.a.o
On 02.02.2013 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have
On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
SVN source tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-150/
Since when do source packages not have to be
On 02.02.2013 21:36, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
SVN source tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-150
On 23.01.2013 14:51, Simone Tripodi wrote:
[ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!!
[ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
[ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
So IPMCs please cast your votes!
+1
I still wish the source package was easier to find.
-- Brane
On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to
find the right package amongst 8 different source packages in 8
different directories.
What do you mean with right? They all are right, because they
contain different
On 04.02.2013 01:05, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi Branko...
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to
find the right package amongst 8
[X] +1 Graduate Apache Bloodhound podling from Apache Incubator
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 11.03.2013 05:04, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Was the potential trademark conflict discussed somewhere? See
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201212.mbox/%3c50ca29ad.6000...@apache.org%3E-
if so, just linking to the discussion is fine.
It was discussed on trademarks@; the
Just tagging the [RESULT] onto the subject so that the vote status gets
updated.
On 24.02.2013 04:36, Devaraj Das wrote:
Hi folks,
With 10 binding +1 votes, this vote has passed. Thanks to everyone who
voted.
Devaraj.
+1 (binding)
On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Devaraj Das wrote:
Hi
On 25.02.2013 05:44, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Thanks to all who voted. Obviously, I'm +1 (binding) on the proposal.
With 14 +1s (10 binding) the vote passes.
I'll start the work to get the podling started.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks
On 07.03.2013 08:54, Andrei Savu wrote:
Thanks to all who voted! With 18 +1s (10 binding) the vote passes.
I'll start the work to get the podling started.
Thanks,
Andrei
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 non-binding
Good luck
On Sat, Mar
On 18.03.2013 11:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
...in the previous discussions were no objections against the graduation
of Apache Onami...
Was there a community vote indicating a desire to graduate?
This
On 18.03.2013 11:35, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi
Last time I checked the rules it state that, for such votes, the IPMC
should be *notified* through general@
This VOTE is not a requirement but is recommended. It is unlikely
that IPMC members will vote to approve graduation unless
Is code for this available for review anywhere?
-- Brane
On 16.04.2013 19:46, serkan özal wrote:
Project Name: Jillegal
1. Abstract:
GC is one of the time taken operations in Java. GC run anytime, marks, swaps
and compacts objects at memory. If there are so many live objects, managing
The voting status script relies on them to update its tables. Currently
there are a number of votes flagged as out of date:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator/votes.html
however, many (if not most) of them were actually cancelled, in some
cases replaced by another (successful) voting
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1
The proposal says that this library has a complete locale
implementation. I'm wondering about the possibilities for code reuse
when/if we start on a second generation of
On 02.09.2014 15:51, Dave wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:43 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
So... do you have a 1.0 artifact staged somewhere? I get that it's a
rebuild of RC4, but I don't see that release referenced anywhere on your
site.
The release files are here:
On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
Hi John
I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple
release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any
previous version up accidentally. This is very common and currently done in
many TLP's including Thrift,
On 02.09.2014 23:06, Dave wrote:
Rats. That directory should not have been included in the release. It
is created as part of the build process and the contents are fetched
by Bower (similar to how Maven pulls in jars). Thanks for your
attention to detail. I will have a new set of release files
On 23.09.2014 14:37, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
I like Lens indeed.
Sooo ... I suppose the PMC chair will be called the Grey Lensman then? :)
-- Brane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On 27.09.2014 05:38, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Hi David.
I believe it will be needing a usual place to publish releases
Release tarballs go here before the release vote starts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ignite
After the vote passes, they should be moved here:
On 28.09.2014 02:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Apache Ignite for Apache
Incubator.
The full proposal is available below. We ask the IPMC to sponsor it, with cos
as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos, hsaputra and brane volunteering to be
Mentors.
On 26.09.2014 20:03, jan i wrote:
On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
(that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex
code bases written before my time):
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
