since that vote are irrelevant, and must not
be included in the initial committer list.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
we're more
concerned about the podling being able to produce decent releases. So
long as the release has all the bits in the right places, that is
enough. However, getting keys signed is a good thing to do in
preparation for ongoing (esp post graduation) releases.
Upayavira
+1.
Upayavira
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:21 -0800, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
+1 Sorry for being late.
-h
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 13:00, Paul Lindner plind...@linkedin.com wrote:
The Shindig community voted on and approved the release of Apache Shiindig
1.1-BETA5. We would now
/%3c45f85f70912082254mc008e20xaa7f7b075366a...@mail.gmail.com%3e
As far as I can see, everything looks good, so +1.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
/$PODLING.html
Although I don't think podlings (including those I mentor) are very good
at keeping it up-to-date.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general
for this information
though, so I can't help there :-(
Upayavira
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Marvin wrote:
Dear Lucene.Net Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you
that
everyone is quite happy to see Shindig graduate and that no-one has any
issues...
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
+1
Upayavira
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 06:41 -0500, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Shindig
as a TLP [1].
I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of
Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board
/checkout on p.a.o approach, so there's little argument that
making them use it for the incubator site is 'educational'.
So, here's my +1.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Upayavira
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 00:48 +0200, Simone Gianni wrote:
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by
the Shindig PMC for a new Amber podling. The goal is to build a community
around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API
the fact that they're
likely to soon enough be re-arrangements of previous attempts.
Upayavira
- Original Message
From: Tim Williams william...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sat, May 29, 2010 11:01:02 AM
Subject: Re: Incubator proposal template
On Sat, May
but that. But with others around, I'm sure we can
work it all out.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
!
Thanks in advance,
Upayavira
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:19 -0700, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
Hi there,
Thrift's 0.3.0 release vote has been stalled waiting for votes from IPMC
members to pass it. Is there anyone who would be willing to weigh in?
-Bryan
-- Forwarded message
+1 binding
Upayavira
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 12:07 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
+1, binding (as of this morning if i did my math correctly)
: I would like to call a vote for accepting Apache Lucy for incubation in
the
: Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask
reasons.
Hope that helps.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
that no one thought it was a problem.
At any rate, we'll go discuss.
I apologise for that. Unfortunately it was (for me) one of those
situations when it takes a resonable volume of mail before it attracts
my attention enough to read what is being said.
Upayavira
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:41 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand
a podling name is really not a question of
what is the project called during incubation, but rather what will it be
called once it has graduated.
(Another interpretation: it ain't finally up to the incubator PMC.)
Just a reflection that I hope helps in some way.
Upayavira
.
Upayavira
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 08:17 -0700, Matthew Sacks wrote:
I'd like to create a podling site for kitty according to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html, although I've never done this
before so any help is appreciated.
a) Is it acceptable for us to create a wiki page
Start by mailing infrastruct...@a.o, and ask there. Alternatively you
can try asking on IRC on #asfinfra on freenode.
Upayavira
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:59 -0400, George Aroush wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Sorry about the spam.
Since Sept 12, 2010, I have not received any email from all of my
it somewhere, working
out which project to put the bug in, which component, what all the boxes
mean.
This is all stuff that takes MUCH more effort than saying this tweak
fixed it for me on a mailing list, if you've never used Jira before.
Upayavira
of the
conversation as it is happening. Therefore, posting IRC logs to a dev
list is not, IMO, sufficient as a means of informing the dev list of
what was discussed there. It needs summarising separately - that is,
assuming anything relevant to the dev list was actually discussed.
Upayavira
.
I'd also like to see a webapp around the subject of ICLA collection.
Such a project would rest upon someone volunteering to do it.
If you're interested, go make a (similar) proposal on
infrastructure-...@. Really, these things live or die by one person
taking it forwards.
Upayavira
On Tue, 2010-09
.
There are discussions ongoing to explore what might be involved to bring
git to the ASF as a principal repository, but there's going to be a lot
of work to do there, and it is not going to be immediate.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:31 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
How do I fix the isis-dev mailing list so that message from JIRA don't
get moderated?
Simplest is to reply-all to one of the moderation messages.
That'll get it added to the 'allow' list for that mailing list.
Upayavira
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 07:27 +, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Upayavira!
It's technically possible to restrict SVN paths afaik. Don't we do
this for parts of our internal member/infra area already?
The thing is that I first like to browse through the sources, just to
be sure. Since
It seems reasonable to import to another area, and port stuff over to
trunk as you have vetted it. You will make your SVN history a bit less
clear, but the history will still be there.
We just can't do that in private.
Upayavira
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 08:58 +0100, Dan Haywood wrote:
On 05/10
? (In no way blows this release though)
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 to graduation, +1 to adding me :-)
Upayavira
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:46 -0700, Bryan Duxbury br...@rapleaf.com
wrote:
Would anyone object to us adding Upayavira as a PMC member/mentor after
the
fact? It was an oversight on my part not to include him in the first
place.
I'll call a new
I'll happily mentor this project too.
Upayavira
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:20 +0100, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org
wrote:
On 28/10/2010 12:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FOOproposal - as you can imagine,
FOO is just a temp name ;-)
We're still
+1
Upayavira
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:02 +0100, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
+1
Regards, Ate
On 10/11/10 16:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
I think we're ready to vote on the
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StanbolProposal now, copy included
below.
This is TPFKAF
told something again and
again.
Upayavira
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:13 -0500, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
wrote:
The premise of this discussion is that running Apache projects are
*permitted* to engage in real-time communications, so long as they
take due care to avoid community problems
we could gain from
Google, maybe that would soothe folk's anxieties, but I don't have an
issue with the name in itself.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Away from PC all day. A definite +1 from me.
Upayavira
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:52 -0800, Dan Peterson
dpeter...@google.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available
at: [1]http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
.
At the same time, folks that don't have ICLAs recorded yet should send
them in.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Actually, I have the ability to create mailing lists at Apache. I'll
attempt to do that later today so that we can move communication over to
its new home ASAP.
Upayavira
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:33 -0800, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I have volunteered to start
if it is possible to migrate our subscriber list
over, the answer is unfortunately no, as we cannot legally transfer a
list of email addresses between organisations.
Upayavira
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:09 +1100, Brett Porter br...@apache.org
wrote:
After coordinating with Upayavira, I've gone ahead and created
+1
Upayavira
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:05 -0800, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan
12th, we now have three mentors signed up and would like to call a
vote to accept Lucene.Net into the Apache Incubator
that it actually works.
In which case, a simple diff between the previous RC and a current one
would show that nothing (legally) material has changed and thereby lead
to an easy +1 vote, from someone who has voted previously.
Upayavira, who accepts that by replying like this he is saying he'll
attempt
Sorry, I should have looked at this. I'll need to dig more, because you
*are* in the incubator group - I saw it when checking your CLAs were
present. So there's something else going on.
Can you confirm what URL you are using, and what error you get?
Upayavira
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:54 -0800
The silence could mean that everyone hates the idea of this project, but
I'm gonna take it to mean that there is simply nothing to complain
about, and that everyone is giving their silent consent, and we should
soon proceed to a vote :-)
Upayavira
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:18 +0100, Ate Douma
+1
Upayavira
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 01:08 +0100, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good
shape so
I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator
the confines of the corporate need, but only
time will tell there.
That's my thoughts.
Upayavira
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:25 -0800, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com
wrote:
My point was:
Bill made a statement, which though rather neutral and ambiguous,
seemed to indicate that he (or perhaps a silent
I've edited http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
removed River. I believe that is all that is required for this purpose.
Upayavira
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:54 +0100, Sim IJskes - QCG s...@qcg.nl wrote:
River has graduated as well, what do we need to do to get removed from
I am concerned that none of the proposed mentors were Incubator PMC
members at the time of the proposal. I believe Alan Gates is now joining
the Incubator PMC, which is great. However, I'd like to see mentorship
resolved before we proceed.
Upayavira
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:26 +0200, Alex Karasulu
Perfect.
Upayavira
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:57 -0700, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Alex Karasulu and Owen O'Malley have both volunteered on the private
list and communicated to me off list their willingness to be mentors.
So hopefully that is resolved as well.
Alan.
On Mar
You've certainly answered my questions. I'd suggest you also post this
info to legal-discuss to close off the thread there, for historical
reasons at least!
Upayavira
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:01 +0200, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi again guys,
just to follow-up the discussion
Subprojects (which includes incubator podlings) don't yet use LDAP.
You should edit the asf-authorization-template file to grant karma for
podlings.
Upayavira
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:50 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I just tried to grant commit rights for someone
? The issue with graduation to
Commons is what happens after graduation - do they suddenly loose some
power over their own affairs, e.g. ease of seeing vote threads. So not
sure the best on this one.
Upayavira
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:29 -0700, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com
wrote:
Agreed, no need
Hi Simone,
My issue (for the commons PMC I guess) is how committer votes will
happen when OGNL graduates.
After graduation, how would one of the current contributors propose a
new committer if they are not themselves on the Commons PMC?
Upayavira
On Sun, 01 May 2011 19:56 +0200, Simone Tripodi
.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On Mon, 16 May 2011 06:42 +0100, Tomaz Muraus to...@cloudkick.com
wrote:
OK, sorry for the confusion, but apparently I need to open a separate
voting
thread so here it is.
Here is also a list of people who have already voted +1 in the proposal
thread which can be found at
an optimal number.
Is having the Champion being a Mentor ok?
Yes, it is fine.
Are there any concerns/discussion with the proposal? (or are +1's
basically saying lgtm.)
I think the +1s are saying that (although I haven't read the proposal).
Upayavira
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:13 AM
Also, distinguish between 'press' activity and just trying to get more
devs on board.
You need to tell people about your project if you want it to grow, but
that is a different business to seeking 'publicity'.
Make sense?
Upayavira
On Tue, 31 May 2011 18:13 -0700, Joe Schaefer joe_schae
for that matter, and this proposal moves gently in that
direction.
If folks approve, we'll need to seek champions for all existing
podlings, and decide what to do about those for which we cannot identify
one.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 6, 2013, at 02:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Discussions on Ross
thing for mentors/champions to take some of
that load off the incubator PMC. It need merely be a reply to a Marvin
'are you there' email.
Upayavira
On Tue, May 7, 2013, at 04:37 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote
I think it was just a question of 'retiring' sounding too final. Using
the word 'dormant' was less threatening, and made it more feasible for
the podlings to go, well, dormant.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want
You need to let us know your wiki username, and we will grant you write
access.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 03:48 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
Hi folks,
Can somebody let me know what is the process of obtaining write access to
the incubator wiki? I need to add an incubator proposal
that 'competitors' don't, such that potential
mentors will feel motivated to support the project.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 07:17 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
There is no requirement to be different to join, I just wonder
06.06.2013 9:36 пользователь Andy Van Den Heuvel
andy.vandenheu
Done.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 06:58 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
Hey all -
Could I get write permission to the wiki, specifically for
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2013 and the like? Username is
AndrewBayer.
A.
-
To
, which are important to community
building.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, at 11:58 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Apologies if this horse has been beaten already, but... have we
discussed the concept of splitting incubator operations into a handful
of separate groups, based on technology areas
recruit replacements? Can we make any promises at
that point?
Upayavira
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013, at 03:16 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Since I realize that most of you can't be
bothered to look at the wiki page I created ;-),
I'll go ahead and post the current content
here for commentary. I hope
Done.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
Hello,
May I have permission to add and edit OData proposal on the Incubator
wiki? My username is StephanKlevenz.
Thanks!
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe,
was Sanjiva saying he won't
claim the trademark, then that's great - he can say it here, or update
the proposal doc or whatever, to reassure people, but the relevant
document was essentially fixed at the time the vote was called, and
substantive issues in it need to be handled in other ways.
Upayavira
Alexei,
To answer your two points.
Firstly they may want to complain in private. Without that option they
may just suffer in silence.
As to your Eco-champion idea, can I suggest you add it to the wiki page
Bertrand created?
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 06:50 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote
such survey, author identity should be optional. Sometimes it
can be deduced, but not always, and if someone would rather not mention
their name, we should give them that opportunity.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
Anomnity of the individual not the project. I can say my mentor was
crap without stating my name - I could be any one of the PPMC.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 03:54
on the incubator general list. If the optic is
too sensitive to discuss in public (eg a potential committer) you may
contact the incubator ombudsman at x...@apache.org.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 05:40 PM, Rob Vesse wrote:
+1
Having also come to Apache by joining a now graduated
something you can be judged against is useful.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 10:37 PM, Rob Vesse wrote:
I have written up the suggestions so far into a wiki page
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhatToExpect
The content is pretty much what has been included in this thread
reorganized
as a PMC in training, their votes are considered important.
In Wave so far, all committers are also PPMC members, so Ali could have
just labelled folks 'PPMC' instead of 'committer' and Joe's concern
would have been addressed.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 01:14 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote
- are you willing to start a new thread expressing your issues
with that document?
Thanks, Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 08:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I don't think I've seen the template before, or it was too long ago and I
failed to notice at the time.
Noah has explained my concern
And Apache Wave too (which is what I first saw before I read the title
more carefully).
Upayavira
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 09:12 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
Hi,
I am concerned about potential confusion with Apache Commons Weaver
[1].
Matt
[1] https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons
need to inform the board of
the change of composition of 'sub-committees'?
My thought is that if we can clarify what is legally possible, we will
be better placed to find the appropriate model for the incubator that
fits within those legal/bylaw bounds.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 06:47 AM
Thanks for that!
Here's another that someone posted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EfnGMEjgK4feature=youtu.be
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 06:49 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
The short guide to graduation
the incubator
and the foundation, allowing merit to be recognised in individuals at a
range of stages within a podlings lifecycle.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Whoops. Wrong email. Oh well. Creating that video was fun anyway.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Thanks for that!
Here's another that someone posted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EfnGMEjgK4feature=youtu.be
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 06:49 AM
votes?
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
of IPMC members
that
they understand the Apache Way well enough to steward their project.
I would be very supportive of such an experiment. Make the size of the
merit granted fit the stage at which an individual is at.
I presume #4 is: Three +1 votes from PPMC members required.
Upayavira
?
My interest is in a lesser level of involvement, where someone has shown
merit within their own PPMC and can get a binding vote there, but
no-where else. That feels to me like a very useful intermediate step to
have.
Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 04:59 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 11/16/13 8:47 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Alex,
I'm not sure I see the difference between a release auditor and an IPMC
member. If someone is sufficiently clued up to audit a release, then
they're surely ready
we're at it. Sure, it'll probably be alright, but best to offer
someone something at a point when they have some appreciation of what
they are joining, no?
Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 01:24 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Joining a PMC does not meaning being handed even one of the keys
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 03:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 11/17/13 3:17 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
With a two tier model - with PPMC membership granting voting rights on
podling releases, then a podling would start with just mentors on its
PPMC. If you clearly knew what you
Marvin, you have my wholehearted agreement.
Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 07:18 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
1) I think there is more to PPMC membership than just voting on releases.
I'm sure that everyone agrees
Currently listed at 180+.
Upayavira
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
(...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
of the conflict is being
present with the podling.
Does anyone here disagree with that sentiment?
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
by the champion or proposed mentors of the project.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
the foundation's policies doesn't.
Upayavira
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013, at 05:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:50 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
And the Incubator _is_ different and does have different policy and
rules, hence on occasion podlings being permitted to do
I would suggest doing the vote and the name discussion simultaneously.
Hopefully the name discussion can be resolved by the time infra is ready
to do its stuff. It really is a good idea to avoid extra infra work, and
multiple mailing list changes, if it can be helped.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 8
FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
report, that is, with comments, if there's things you need to say.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
The podling in question is Stratos.
There was a lengthy discussion on a thread about
have
wanted to stay here, and mentors have considered this acceptable.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
I would like to kindly request some assistance
from the mentors of the following projects: devicemap,
kalumet, s4, wave and npanday (all CCed
that a mature ASF project, one that is
code-complete, doesn't release regularly, but an incubator project would
not fall into that camp, therefore being able to say we can muster the
resources to make a 'legally valid release' within a year seems
eminently reasonable to me.
Upayavira
can
make something excellent from this opportunity, something that benefits
all within the wider OOo community.
So +1 to this proposal.
Upayavira
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:02 -0400, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE
will not be making any
statements about the licensing credentials of that code. Do with it as
you wish.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
the project.
* and that you can attract enough Apache people who are prepared to
mentor your project. The mentors take on the role of linking the project
into the foundation during incubation.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
) Patches made by students who are not committers should be uploaded
to JIRA, with correct provenance (ICLA signed) before they are
committed
(d) All development happens on the ASF list
(e) Any idea of doing a release at Apache within six months must be
dropped
Upayavira
On Thu, 30 Jun
I would support a one month wait. No more. They've had a long time. One
month is long enough to show seriousness. With no movement in that time,
a swift vote can close the project down.
Upayavira
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:36 -0400, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I
to understand better what is expected of you, there are
plenty people here who can explain.
Upayavira
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 08:58 +0800, Chen Liu liuchen0...@gmail.com
wrote:
We're preparing for the 4th version release.
We need the whole July to do this work,thanks for your patience.
2011/7/2
don't think it would be very fruitful to
further force a round peg in a square hole.
Unfortunately, I concur.
+1
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general
, during an 18 month incubation, cannot draw in new blood,
how can we believe that it will do so as a TLP?
Marketing of the project, getting it known, getting people using it
enough so as to draw in new blood, is clearly a part of the incubation
process.
Upayavira
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:45 -0400
is that the
notice file needs to be better populated before this release can go out.
Upayavira
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:07 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu
wrote:
A week has passed since this vote started and but still no feedback so
far.
Possibly it was drowned by the Accumulo discussions, but now
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
