Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have > fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC... > > Please follow the link below for the new RC details : > > http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)

On 01/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > >> > The new release candidate uses exactly the same name for the artifacts > >> > and the SVN tag. > >> > > >> > This makes it ver

Re: Location of Incubator releases

downloads/download_lang.cgi > Thanks, > > Francis > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:53 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 01/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> I fixed the empire-db site download links. (might take a few hours for > >> the change to be propagated

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)

On 02/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Sebb, > > So to sum up, do we still have blocking issues left? If needed I can brew an > other rc to fix a few more of those minor issues (they are fixed > in trunk). IMO the NOTICE file problems need to be fixed. >

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have > >> fixed all the severe and blocking issues

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> > > >> I did a cross-check to make sure only the used dependencies were > >> mentioned in the LICENSE and got the not

Re: [HEADS-UP] Pivot 1.3 release voting started...

The NOTICE file mentions Tomcat, but it is an ASF project and is therefore included in the second paragraph. There are rather more 3rd party items mentioned in the NOTICE file than in the LICENSE. Every 3rd party library will have some kind of license and these need to be documented in the LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC2

On 03/09/2009, Todd Volkert wrote: > All: > > The Pivot community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache > Pivot 1.3 Release Candidate 2. We would now like to request the permission > of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts on the Pivot download page. > > The artifacts, R

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > A new RC is now available, please see details below : > > --- > Please review and vote on the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. > > > The artifacts are available for review at: > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4/ S

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC2

On 04/09/2009, Todd Volkert wrote: > > The NOTICE file contains items which should not be there, i.e. Tomcat. > > > > > The servlet implementation could come from a number of places. We > originally didn't mention it in the NOTICE file, but it got caught as > something that needed to be there

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3 RC2

On 04/09/2009, Todd Volkert wrote: > > > > The LICENSE file does not contain the full CCA LICENSE for the Silk > > > > icons; see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode for > > > > the full text. > > > > > > Good to know - I'll update it on the trunk. Given that we got it fro

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc1

On 03/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache > Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the > Incubator PMC for this release. > > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, > struc

Re: Review of cassandra NOTICE and LICENSE requested.

On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > > Attached are draft copies of LICENSE and NOTICE files for the cassandra > project. > > LICENSE is monolithic, it contains a copy of all licenses. It is meant > to replace the texts we currently keep in lib/licenses. > > NOTICE contains an entry for all the

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please > see details below : Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks. > --- > > > The artifacts are available for review at: > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/phota

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> >> A new R

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please > >> see details below : > > > > Looks OK no

Re: Review of cassandra NOTICE and LICENSE requested.

On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > > ... > > > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing? > > If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file

Re: Help reviewing Pivot's NOTICE and LICENSE (Was: Re: Copyright notices in NOTICE file @legal-discuss)

On 09/09/2009, Todd Volkert wrote: > Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the > intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files > to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a sanity > check from those that kno

Re: Review of cassandra NOTICE and LICENSE requested.

On 09/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 22:28 +0100, sebb wrote: > > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for > > testing? If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in > > the binary release. > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Hi, > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release > candidate. > > These are the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote: > On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our > > previous attempt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> Distribution files are located here > >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > > > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. > > > I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal. > > > > > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about > your verdict. > > However I have problems to reproduce your findings. > I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from > http://people.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere > > wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere > > wrote: > > [X] -1 > > Distribution archives are broken. > >>> > >>> Maven artifacts don't have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

t in the release [excluding the Maven-specific repo config files] > Thanks, > > Francis > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

e following footer: Copyright © 2008-2009, The Apache Software Foundation www.empire-db.org The URL needs to be fixed or removed. > Cheers, > > Francis > > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:06 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 12/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

On 11/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache > Cassandra 0.4.0-rc2. We would now like to request the approval of the > Incubator PMC for this release. > > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, > struc

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

On 14/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: > Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is > defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. > > There are two *binding* +1 VO

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M3

he distribution, > >>>so should not be mentioned in the NOTICE file. > >>>(blocking) > > >>>Alswhat they apply. > Last time I corrected NOTICE /LICENCE file that you commented at M2 release. > It does not changed since M2 release. Sorry, I

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On 17/09/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > Hi; > > > > This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected > Sebb's concerns. > > > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts >

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected > Sebb's concerns. > > OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and > Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is > defined as JSR

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On 18/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > > >>>The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree > >>>contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar. > >>>This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in > >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of PDFBox 0.8.0-incubating

On 18/09/2009, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > Hi, > > The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of PDFBox. The > release candidate is available for review at > >http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/pdfbox-0.8.0-incubating/ > > See the attached original vote messages for m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

Just noticed that the jar files in the zip/tar.gz archives are identical to each other, but are not identical to the jar files in the Maven repository - they have different hashes, for example: tgz/zip: empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.jar:103bed94cfba5efe0d2c3d4e90e4c89a Maven: empire-db-2.0.5-incubati

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > Hi sebb, > > we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since > everything but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy > solution for having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date and this > url. Do we really need to fix those or are they non-issues? Issues, but non-blocking. > On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue Can't one provi

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

this RC6 as the final 2.0.5-incubating release. > > Thanks, > The apache empire-db team. > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date an

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

gister votes. > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db > >> > >> 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) > >> > >> > >

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > I see, that +1 was for the pinging of the maven guys :-) Yes. Did not realise at the time that using +1 there was ambiguous; sorry about that. > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 23/09/2009, Francis De Br

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On 18/11/2009, Josh Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Incubator PMC, > > The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache > VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to > publish this release. > > Th

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > There is only a "bz2" archive. > > Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are > > more commonly supported. > > > > IMO, thi

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On 23/11/2009, Branko Čibej wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> There is only a "bz2" archive. > >>&g

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On 23/11/2009, Josh Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I'm not on the general incubator list but have followed the discussion for > this thread via the online archives. > > There are two things I'd like to point out. I created the archive in .bz2 > format

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

On 03/12/2009, Paul Querna wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Bhuvaneswaran A wrote: > >> > >> We tend to update the api docs generated using doxygen and java doc on > >> a nightly basis. > > > > Unreleased artifacts should be linked only from the developer po

Re: Cassandra PPMC?

On 16/12/2009, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > ...To my mind, the 'official' record of a PPMC membership _should_ be the > > > project's status page: > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/$PODLING.html > > > > Although I don't think

Re: Incubator PMC Membership Status Check 2010

Minotaur (people.apache.org) is currently down, see: http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ S/// On 15/02/2010, Ate Douma wrote: > On 02/15/2010 05:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Ate Douma wrote: > > > > > > > I didn't receive one. > > > > > > > Check your @apache.org e-mail. That is the add

Re: Latest incarnation of site update?

On 11/04/2010, Martin Cooper wrote: > What is the current mechanism for getting the live web site to update > after committing the changes? There was some discussion of svnpubsub a > while ago, so at first I thought it might be magic, but nothing > happened. I waited an hour for an automatic up

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our second release, > 0.3.0. As required by Incubator policy, we need IPMC approval for > this release. There is a concurrent release vote ongoing on > . > > The current (passing) RAT output can be seen at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >>> The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our second release, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > >> >> On 0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On 06/05/2010, sebb wrote: > On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > > >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > > >> > On Thu, May 6, 2010 a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > >> >> On 0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: > Where is the KEYS file? The directory structures of the bz2 and zip archives are different - the file r_orders_order_88833465_api_ivan_net_nz_vps_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >> Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: > >> <http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/libcloud-0.3.1/> > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On 08/05/2010, sebb wrote: > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > > >> Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: > > >> <htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >> >> Test tarbal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > >> >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On 08/05/2010, sebb wrote: > On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: > > >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb wrote: > > >> > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > IPMCers, > > Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list. > I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the > process indicated here: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

ava:20) at org.apache.wink.server.internal.providers.entity.JAXBCustomContextResolverCacheTest.testCustomResolverCacheOn(JAXBCustomContextResolverCacheTest.java:197) On 11/05/2010, sebb wrote: > On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > > IPMCers, > > > > Win

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > Thanks Sebb for your review, > > I'll try to address each of your concerns: > > 1) AL headers are missing from... > > These files list implementation classes like other standard > META-INF/services/* files. We may be abl

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > Sebb, > > Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, > the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just > confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in >

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 12/05/2010, sebb wrote: > On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > > > Sebb, > > > > Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, > > the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just > > confir

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > Thanks Sebb, > > Just to be clear, is this a minus 1 vote from you? If so, I'll roll it all > back and restart the process. The missing AL headers would have been -1 from me, but as they cannot currently be fixed that can be left fo

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

On 14/05/2010, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 05/13/2010 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > Just curious. If a graduated project is sponsoring an incubation does > > the podling *require* mentors? Isn't that the roll of the sponsoring PMC? > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache PhotArk M2-incubating released

On 23/05/2010, Luciano Resende wrote: > The Apache PhotArk team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > PhotArk M2-incubating. > http://incubator.apache.org/photark/photark-downloads.html > There are some problems with the download page: - the download links for the zip/tar.gz files po

Incubator podling website problems

There's a lot of inconsistency in the various podling web-sites. Seems to me that they should all clearly mention Apache and the Incubator, and should include the Apache Feather, together with clears links to the Incubator and ASF foundation sites. Likewise, and download pages should use the mirr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache PhotArk M2-incubating released

On 23/05/2010, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:59 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 23/05/2010, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> The Apache PhotArk team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > >> PhotArk M2-incubating. > > > >> h

Re: Incubator podling website problems

On 23/05/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > Some of them barely mention Apache and the Incubator: > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/ > > No disrespect, but I find this example unfounded. If you go to that > website, you see a _huge_ font (and a feather) that leaves absolutely > no room for

Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-incubating

On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version > 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard > Apache/Maven release process as documented at > http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html. This > is a lazy

Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-incubating

On 26/05/2010, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On May 26, 2010, at 3:31 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > >> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version > >> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the st

Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-incubating

On 26/05/2010, ant elder wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > > On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote: > > > >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen > >> wrote: > >>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version > >>> 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-incubating

On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sebb wrote: > > > The staging site appeared to be part of the vote as it was not > > specifically excluded. > > > This was a mistake - it probably should have been excluded. AFAICT, > stag

Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-incubating

On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder wrote: > > >>> I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to > >>> recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats > >>> not enough as an ASF release must include a sou

Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-incubating

On 26/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, sebb wrote: > > It's a bit confusing to have two copies of the N&L files in the root > > of the archive: > > LICENSE and LICENSE.txt have the same content. > > NOTICE and NOTICE.txt

Re: [ANN] Apache Shiro 1.0.0-incubating Released!

On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote: > Dear Apache Shiro Community, > > We are proud and excited to offer Apache Shiro's first stable release > as an Apache Incubator podling! > > Version 1.0.0-incubating is available immediately for download here: > > http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/download

Re: [ANN] Apache Shiro 1.0.0-incubating Released!

On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > The download page links to reposity.apache.org. > > > > However repository.apache.org is not to be used for direct > > publication to end users, it is for publishing to the main maven repo. > > > This wasn't clear on the apache infrastructure page - it s

Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.3.0 Release Candidate

On 07/06/2010, Bryan Duxbury wrote: > Hi all, > > The Thrift project has prepared a new release, version 0.3.0, and voted on > it on our dev list, where it's passed. I understand that I now need to get > IPMC votes from everyone to make it official. > > The tarball can be found at > > > http

Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.3.0 Release Candidate

Also, what are "Java scturcts" ? These are referenced in the NEWS file (which might be better named as RELEASE_NOTES). On 07/06/2010, sebb wrote: > On 07/06/2010, Bryan Duxbury wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The Thrift project has prepared a new release, versi

Incubator podlings without access to /incubator/public SVN tree

The following incubator SVN groups don't appear to have access to the /incubator/public SVN tree: amber bval deltacloud depot hise libcloud Is this intentional, or just an oversight? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...

IVY SVN duplicated under Ant and Incubator SVN

Ivy started out as an Incubator project with code in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/ It is now an Ant sub-project with code in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/ However the incubator SVN tree still has files in it Something seems to have gone wrong here. --

Retired/dormant projects

The following podlings appear to be retired or dormant: juice - status says dormant kabuki - status says withdrawn wadi - status page has not been updated since creation as far as I can tell; no updates to SVN since end of 2005 Should their SVN directories be made read-only?

Suggestion for clutch - check SVN directories

Clutch could compare the directories under: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ with the list of graduated podlings, and report a warning against any that still have SVN directories. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsu

SVN tidy up

Composer was abandoned, and its SVN tree is all but empty - can it be deleted? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/composer/ Only files are following in trunk: .classpath .project Likewise, Lucene.net only contains a README file Can it be deleted? BTW http://incubator.apache.org/projec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.1.0-incubating

On 28/06/2010, Gabriele Columbro wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC members, > > this to vote is the first incubator release for Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS, > with the artifacts being versioned as 0.1.0-incubating. > > The release has passed the Chemistry incubator PMC vote, see > http://mail-archives.apa

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Approve the M2 release of Apache Stonehenge

On 30/06/2010, Ben Dewey wrote: > Sebb created a JIRA ticket for us. I will repackage and return later for > another vote. That JIRA has no bearing on the release, as it only affects SVN. Otherwise I would have replied to the VOTE thread... So long as the correct EOLs are present

Re: VOTE: Release Apache RAT 0.7

On 13 July 2010 23:50, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7. > > The distribution files (binary and source) are here: > >     > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-057/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/ KEYS file? SVN tag which

Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.3.0 RC 5

On 14 July 2010 21:58, Upayavira wrote: > Following up on Bryan's mail, we'd like to complete a release of Thrift > 0.3.0 RC5, and would like additional incubator PMC votes. > > We have so far had one IPMC vote (mine) and four PPMC votes. > > So, please take a look at: > > http://people.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the > project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation > to present the project resolution to the board. The community > graduation vote was held and resulted in 27

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On 16 August 2010 19:33, sebb wrote: > On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen wrote: >> The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the >> project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation >> to present the project resolution t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the > project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation > to present the project resolution to the board. The community > graduation vote was held and resulted in 27

Re: When a committer leaves ...

On 24 August 2010 02:50, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Many graduating projects trim their list of committers / ppmc members, > primarily because the list of initial committers rarely reflects the active > people on the project. > > In your case just ask infra to remove the committer from the project ac

Re: Access to the incubator group

On 24 August 2010 03:00, Benson Margulies wrote: > Noel, > > Adding me to the PMC didn't add me to the ldap group so that I could > update the web site. I opened a ticket, but sebb points out that this > was an act of lese majesty, and the request needs to come from you. Tha

Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator)

On 8 September 2010 12:39, dan haywood wrote: > And another benefit of putting user traffic on the dev list is that > it'll give the devs exposure to any probs that regular users are having with > actually using the framework (ie so we can mature its documentation etc) In ASF projects I would

Re: Outsmarted myself with the mailing list system

On 11 September 2010 15:08, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> It looks to me as if I asked Infra to list me as a mod under my apache email >> alias, but of the actual 'from' that shows up is my gmail. >> >> What do others do? Just list their w

Re: Help with SVN access to River

The login "pats" has not been granted access to the incubator/river SVN tree This requires someone (normally the PMC chair, because they should know if the request is valid) to update the asf-authorization-template file. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess On 14 September 2010 14

Re: Help with SVN access to River

On 14 September 2010 15:13, sebb wrote: > The login "pats" has not been granted access to the incubator/river SVN tree > > This requires someone (normally the PMC chair, because they should > know if the request is valid) to update the asf-authorization-template >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.1.0-incubating (RC2)

On 16 September 2010 23:55, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Gabriele Columbro > wrote: >> The vote is open for 72 hours. > > The window closes tomorrow. AFAIK the 72 hours is a minimum, not a maximum. > We're still one IPMC vote short and I > believe Gianugo (ou

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.2

On 28 September 2010 19:37, Josh Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Incubator PMC, > > The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache > VCL 2.2.  We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to > publish this release.

podlings.xml - field to hold details of non-current podlings

Podlings can either graduate, go dormant or retire. There should be a reason for changing to state to dormant or retire; at present this is stored as additional text in the description field, which is not ideal. I'd like to add a new field (call it for now) to contain the details; possible better

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >