On 04/09/2012 09:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
+0: don't care
-1: do not accept CloudStack
You can add me as a mentor to the project.
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
...@apache.org)
* Carl Trieloff (cctriel...@apache.org)
* Eric Woods (wood...@apache.org)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that David Lutterkort be
appointed to the office of Vice President, Deltacloud, to serve in
accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board
+1
On 10/11/2011 08:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1
On Oct 4, 2011, at 1:00 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded the first release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.1. The rc is
available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.1/rc1/
Please vote on the release
On 02/21/2011 01:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Mark Strubergstrub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I'm not really fit with ruby projects, but there are quite a few sources with
LGPL license headers. e.g.
I voted on the project vote with +1. I believe the release vote requires
another
IPMC / member vote.
Carl.
On 02/14/2011 01:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded a release candidate for Deltacloud 0.2.0. The rc is
available from
It is on the wiki. DeltaCloud
Deltacloud
Deltacloud defines a web service API for interacting with cloud service
providers and resources in those clouds in a unified manner. In
addition, it consists of a number of implementations of this API for the
most popular clouds.
I'll chase up Deltacloud to make sure it is in by tomorrow AM.
Carl.
On 11/15/2010 04:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Noel,
It's my understanding that Lucy isn't on this reporting cycle and was included
on the wiki by mistake.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/15/10 12:03 PM, Noel J.
On 09/10/2010 05:31 AM, Gav... wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2867
Thanks :-)
Gav...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not
coping the
code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere
under ASL
but used as dependencies for running.
I
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not coping
the
code, but using components
On 09/08/2010 11:06 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
+1
Carl.
On 08/18/2010 07:31 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks
On 08/17/2010 07:48 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others on this
question.
The thread implies it comes down
On 08/17/2010 11:39 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 8:45:01 AM
Subject: Re: Radical revamp
On 17/08/2010 13:21, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[...]
Isn't that why we
- Project basically setup (info for 3 people still being worked to get
ICLA correctly listed)
- Code has been imported.
- Working to get Code Grant on file
- Project active, commits and mail list discussions have started.
- The website has not been setup yet.
Project is up, running and
David is currently on vacation, so I'll post a brief report for him:
Deltacloud.
Deltacloud is still in project setup. The main delay has been
working the process of ICLA recording and account setup. Once
the account requests have been processed, I expect I will be able
to complete the project
On 06/14/2010 01:14 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Noel J. Bergmann...@devtech.com wrote:
There are several missing reports. Bluesky, Deltacloud, Lucene Connector
Framework, and River.
POST THEM IMMEDIATELY!
Here is the one for DeltaCloud (which I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carl Trieloff closed INCUBATOR-107.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Moving setup to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2723
: Carl Trieloff
JIRA to track the setup of Deltacloud incubator project.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12869336#action_12869336
]
Carl Trieloff commented on INCUBATOR-107:
-
Will be working through
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12869346#action_12869346
]
Carl Trieloff commented on INCUBATOR-107:
-
I'm setting up incubator status page
On 05/17/2010 01:09 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
by my count, the vote for Deltacloud yielded 13 +1 votes and no 0 or -1
votes.
I will work with Carl to get Deltacloud set up in the incubator.
thanks to everybody for the very positive reception,
David
Thanks, I start the process
On 05/12/2010 08:45 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote
for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2]
I _think_ I've added everybody who expressed interest in being a mentor
or initial committer to
+1
Carl.
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
We've added three mentors since starting the proposal thread, so I
would like to start the vote to accept Whirr into the Apache
Incubator.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
On 05/07/2010 02:33 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi;
+1;
I am happy to help during incubation process;
Thanks;
--Gurkan
Gurkan,
Is this an offer to help mentor the project, or just help out as needed.
Reason
for asking is if you would like to be represented onto the proposal or
just
On 05/07/2010 10:21 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Carl,
if you need additional mentors, count me in.
thanks,
dims
Dims,
That would be great.
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I want to take a few minutes to thank everyone involved on our
graduation. The Apache board
has approved our graduation and we will begin the post graduation
transition.
Congratulations to the project and many thanks to all those that have
taken an interest in Qpid
regards
Carl.
Many thanks to our mentors,
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Congratulations!
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our
Carl Trieloff wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev
list that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC
felt that the
Qpid project should increase its diversity. Over the intervening
months Qpid has
added more
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1 !
(PS: Please add Email addresses to the Resolution).
ack, will do so before I submit it to the board.
many thanks
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Qpid Project:
* Aidan Skinner
* Alan Conway
* Arnaud Simon
* Carl Trieloff
* Craig Russell
* Gordon Sim
* Jonathan Robie
* John O'Hara
* Kim van der Riet
* Marnie
+1 it is great project
Carl.
Luciano Resende wrote:
[X] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
(non-binding)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Niklas Gustavsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1
of responsibility
of the Apache Qpid Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Qpid Project:
* Aidan Skinner
* Alan Conway
* Arnaud Simon
* Carl Trieloff
* Craig Russell
* Gordon Sim
Smith
* Steve Huston
* Yoav Shapira
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that
Carl Trieloff be appointed to the office of Vice President,
Qpid, to serve in accordance with and subject to the
direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
Foundation until death, resignation
David Crossley wrote:
BlueSky, Empire-DB, Lucene.Net, Qpid, Thrift are missing
their reports this month.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2008
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
-David
-
To unsubscribe,
As Adian is away on vacation I have summarized the thread. Binding votes
marked with '*'.
Here are the +1's across the release so far.
Rajith RC5
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg18855.html
Carl RC5
Aidan Skinner wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you able to summaries this vote so far for us. I believe we still need
one binding vote.
Since it's a restart I think we still need 3. Unless I'm missing
something the vote currently
Aidan,
Are you able to summaries this vote so far for us. I believe we still
need one binding vote.
Carl.
Martin Ritchie wrote:
All looks good to me.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
the vote on qpid-dev at 2008-08-22:
http://markmail.org/message/2a6pmx3sdgvh5bu5
And closed it on 2008-08-27 http://markmail.org/message/xb3qppr5krtdp43w
There were:
8 +1s (1 of which was binding)
0 0's
0 -1's
Which were cast by:
Alan Conway
Arnaud Simon
Martin Ritchie
Gordon Sim
Carl Trieloff
Yoav
they are located in the sub-dir for each language, and are specific for
each lang. someone who installs C++
does not care about Python or Java readme etc or visa versa.
Carl.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Aidan,
http://people.apache.org/~aidan/qpid/M3-RC2/qpid-incubating-M3.tar.gz
doesn't have
From what I have seen many of the incubator releases have been better
vetted than those
from graduated projects. So I don't buy the argument.
I also had to bite my tough on the maven thread.. I think it is mostly
BS to give Java an easy
route to publicity from inside incubator if no other
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I see a trend in podlings not filling in their status files. Shindig
and Pig both have the bare template as their status file. Can someone
(e.g. the mentors of said projects) update the status files please?
I'm hoping for a completely checked status file, but in the very
Edward J. Yoon wrote:
Hello, I have some question about CCLA.
Should we have a CCLA even if it is an individual work? and, In the
similar context, how does that apply to an individual working for
government agency?
Thanks.
If you are not independent -- i.e. work for a company then you
+1 Carl.
ant elder wrote:
After 29 months in the incubator, 19 releases, 25 new committers, and
tons of emails the Apache Tuscany community (with support from our
mentors) again feels that we are ready to graduate to an official top
level project at Apache as indicated by the community
Dear root,
Please create an id for Ted Ross on the Qpid project under Incubation.
Preferred userid: tross
Full name: Ted Ross
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: qpid
ICLA is on file.
Votes:(17: +1
Marshall Schor wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I reviewed the submitted project reports for April. I'm not sure if
people are actively following the page or the diffs, so here's a
summary of my review.
OK:
* CouchDB
* PDFBox (I'm a mentor)
* Tika (I'm a mentor)
OK with comments:
* CXF -
Rupert Smith wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Don't forget about me. I am a currently active Qpid committer and not
an employee of either RedHat
or JPMC. I am an independent consultant who operates through a company
called The Badger Sett Ltd.
and all my contributions to Qpid thus far have been completely
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
If you take a step back and think about it...this process has been
like pulling teeth. Don't you think there's room
for all the folks on Qpid to be more open and forthcoming given this
experience?
I am sorry if
of the Apache Qpid Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Qpid Project:
* Alan Conway
* Arnaud Simon
* Carl Trieloff
* Gordon Sim
what is the diversity?
Carl.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 from me!
Bruce Snyder wrote:
| On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| After 20 months in the incubator, 6 releases complete and 2 more
on the
| way
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Carl Trieloff wrote:
what is the diversity?
Carl.
This could have been asked as part of the resolution discussion instead
of hijacking the vote, but
was out last week - thanks for the info.
Carl.
18, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
No rush, I probably won't get to do it until Monday next week anyhow.
Others are welcome to help as well, it's not all on your shoulders ;)
Yoav
We are also missing
Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Kulp write:
a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 [suggests
that]
all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed to RedHat
employees.
I think the
].
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tuscany.html
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Have you guys been following the Graduation Guide [1][2], I was
checking the status page [3] for getting information around QPid
sebb wrote:
On 05/03/2008, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marnie McCormack wrote:
All,
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world.
Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
? -- If so we can do so.
Carl.
[3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/qpid.html
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
less awareness of their activity in both
sebb wrote:
On 29/02/2008, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments on last version ..
- It looks like you are using a non-applicable template for the board
resolution. Take a look at other incubator graduation resolutions.
- Specifically, the paragraph on establishing bylaws isn't
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:12 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2008 22:18, sebb wrote:
None of the mentors seem to be included.
Perhaps this is normal for graduating podlings?
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Needless to say, it is that time again, when Incubator Reports march towards
their inevitable meeting with the Board.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
yea, you are right, me got it wrong in my head.
Carl.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Carl,
According to:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Qpid isn't support to report till April.
Dan
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Needless to say
sebb wrote:
On 04/03/2008, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 29/02/2008, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Comments on last version ..
- It looks like you are using a non-applicable template for the board
resolution
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
Do they *all* have CCLA's?
absolutely.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
less awareness of their activity in both directions. The worse part of
it is that the lack of awareness will probably reduce the probability of
any of the PMC members to be nominated for ASF
* Arnaud Simon
* Carl Trieloff
* Gordon Sim
* John O'Hara
* Marnie McCormack
* Martin Ritchie
* Rafael Schloming
* Rajith Attapattu
* Robert Greig
* Robert Godfrey
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that
Carl
are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Qpid PMC:
Alan Conway
Arnaud Simon
Carl Trieloff
Gordon Sim
John O'Hara
Marnie McCormack
Martin Ritchie
Rafael Schloming
Rajith Attapattu
Robert Greig
Robert Godfrey
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Carl
Trieloff be and hereby
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RESOLVED, that the Apache Qpid PMC be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of the Qpid Messaging implementations,
clients and related software components, based on software
to be discharged of responsibility.
Craig
On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
The Qpid community has being working through the process to graduate.
Before we
formally have one of our mentors start the vote on the Incubator
lists we would like
to invite any additional comments
Craig L Russell wrote:
I think it's confusing people to use the term binding in different
contexts. I'd like to propose that the term is only used to refer to
decisions/votes that are binding on The Apache Software Foundation,
which means decisions/votes made by a duly authorized PMC.
In
agree that rename is required.
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Hans
My understanding is that you do need to change the package names, but
I'd like to see who else chimes in here.
Any decent Java IDE will rename the packages and fix up the code
without too much hassle.
Paul
On 1/22/08, Hans
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Carl.
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community.
J Aaron Farr wrote:
Ting Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, we are going to move our project BlueSky (Blue Sky Distance
Collaboration System) to Apache Incubator for future development...
你好
The proposal is interesting, but I have a few concerns.
I can't get to
Top-posting as it is related but different question. I would like to
contribute to the
apache legal questions/ answers / discussing. What is the process for
joining
apache legal?
(I am not a lawyer)
Carl.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Keep in mind, Sun stuff wasn't necessarily handled under
We could add rules indefinitely to make just about anyone not usable...
I don't have any issues
with Pig.
Carl.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
Coping incubator general and apache legal lists on this thread for
additional comments on this topic.
Carl.
John O'Hara wrote:
Yes, IBM are I fully paid up licensee of Java technology - and can do
whatever they like with it.
I asked permission of IBM if we could implement the XMS API some
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from
different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can not
send the account setup mail to root?
Given each new committer vote will have 3 PMC votes, why does a mentor
have to send the account setup to root?
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Carl,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
from different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can
not send the account setup mail to root?
Given each new committer vote
van der Riet
Martin Ritchie
Rupert Smith
Gordon Sim
Robert Grieg
Robert Godfrey
Carl Trieloff
Rafael Schloming
0 vote:
Yoav Shapira
Vote thread -- note two links as I first incorrectly posted without
[vote], added [vote] minutes later...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-qpid
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
If your private@ list vote had three +1s from IPMC members (e.g.
your mentors), then IMO all you need to do is inform the IPMC of
the vote when complete.
Should probably notify the PMC at the time of the vote.
the request for an account
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
A suggestion that one of our mentors had made to us was to do a poll for
concerns on the private list to see if PPMC was happy with the committer
to be added to the project (notice and to see if any of PPMC have
concerns). If all went well
and we are still a mentor short.
Regards
On 12/04/07, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian,
It would be fantastic to have you help us out in Qpid if you can
make it
happen.
regards
Carl.
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote
Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1 from me
Paul
On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is
Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1 from me.
Paul
On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is as
Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1 from me.
Paul
On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is as
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
The reports from the following projects are still missing:
FtpServer
Heraldry
Ivy
JuiCE
Lucene.Net
NMaven
Qpid
Please add your reports to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2007.
PS. The TripleSoup and UIMA reports are missing the incubating
Brian,
It would be fantastic to have you help us out in Qpid if you can make it
happen.
regards
Carl.
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
We created a report for Qpid. I guess that we mailed it to the wrong
location, where should the report be sent for inclusion?
The Wiki is the staging area for the report, or you can post to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Where did you send
Fixed typo in-line...
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
We created a report for Qpid. I guess that we mailed it to the wrong
location, where should the report be sent for inclusion?
The Wiki is the staging area for the report, or you can post
Noel,
We created a report for Qpid. I guess that we mailed it to the wrong
location, where
should the report be sent for inclusion?
Carl
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
More and more ASF Members continue to join the Incubator PMC to help
shephard projects through the process. ActiveMQ is the
The Qpid M1 release has been placed at:
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/qpid/M1-incubating/java/
Download pages will be updated shortly
Regards
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Srinivas
Brian McCallister
Mentors
---
Cliff Schmitt
Paul Fremantle
PPMC
Alan Conway
Kim van der Riet
Martin Ritche
Marnie McCormack
Steve Vinoski
Gordon Sim
Robert Grieg
Rajith Attapatta
John O'Hara
Bhupendra Bhardwaj
Rafael Schloming
Carl Trieloff
Others
--
Suresh Kodichath
Frank Lynch
I will leave the vote open it till Wednesday at which time I will
provide a summary of the final vote. Qpid has the votes required for
releasing, with vote running longer than 72 hours and thus would like to
provide notice of closing the vote Wednesday if there are any additional
votes.
Brian McCallister wrote:
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I think Cliff voted for
this, so I suspect it is okay. Just want to make sure :-)
Bhupendra Bhardwaj
Rafael Schloming
Carl Trieloff
Others
--
Suresh Kodichath
Frank Lynch
Sam Joyce
Tejeswar Das
Regards
Carl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marnie McCormack
Steve Vinoski
Gordon Sim
Robert Grieg
Rajith Attapatta
John O'Hara
Bhupendra Bhardwaj
Rafael Schloming
Carl Trieloff
Others
--
Suresh Kodichath
Frank Lynch
Sam Joyce
Tejeswar Das
Regards
Carl
For development releases, it seems like it should be quite reasonable
and maybe needed to use
snapshots, however when doing a major release it would seem that you
would take all possible
effort not to use snapshots, and only use them if absolutely required.
Carl.
Paul Querna wrote:
John
Having been through this, may I suggest listing all the project
terms/values/etc and write a script
to randomly combines them -- (and yes we have a script that does this... :-)
The months of normal naming practices did not turn up a non
trademarked/place/etc name...
Carl.
Johnson, Eric
I have completed the rename on the wiki from Blaze to Glasgow to Qpid. The
updated page (only the name and ASF resources to be setup have changed). The
new page can be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QpidProposal
Project setup can now be done with Qpid for the name and qpid lowercase
If there are no more last comments on the name by COB, I will update the
proposal with
Qpid and we will use this for ASF resource setup.
Regards
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I think we have a new name, we need to come to agreement
on how to do the CaPs.
a.) Qpid
b.) QPid
c.) QPID
I like a, then c.
Carl.
sophitia que wrote:
I am +1 on the name.
On 8/10/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Archit Shah wrote:
+1 for Qpid
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo