Ok, let give this a second try:
I count the following +1:
Chris Mattmann, Alan Cabrera, Bill Rowe, Bernd Fondermann (all binding),
Owen O'Malley (in process of being added to Incubator PMC)
Greg Reddin, Jerome Boulon, Leif Hedstrom (non-binding).
There were no other explicit votes cast.
However,
Just a second. (Dropping TO gene...@hadoop.a.o.)
Please don't confuse DISCUSSION and VOTE.
BTW, it's best practice for a Incubator proposal (or any other type of
initiative at Apache) to first have a DISCUSSION or PROPOSAL thread,
and then have a vote afterwards, when thread hijacking is less
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Fair point.
The naming debate is only about the location of the project in svn and
the mailing lists, right? Conducting the vote with this variable has
become more arduous than all the INFRA and site
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Fair point.
The naming debate is only about the location of the project in svn and
the mailing lists, right? Conducting
On 7/1/2010 11:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've been suggesting it would be simpler for Chukwa to go directly to
TLP but if thats not going to happen then you have my support to
incubate if thats what they really want to do, and I agree a new vote
might making things clearer. It seems a shame to
Original incubator proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
Vote put forward to incubator:
1. recommend TLP with guides to help the initial pmc,
2. accept incubating with tlp resource naming, but -incubating release
naming
3. accept incubating requiring all incubator naming
Hi Guys,
My recommendation would be Option #1 - I think you guys would be OK as a TLP
with some guidance, I'm not sure the Incubator will add anything that you guys
can't learn on your own as a TLP with some mentorship from Incubator PMC'ers or
ASF members helping you (Owen is an ASF member
On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On 6/30/10 9:42 AM, Eric Yang ey...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Original incubator proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
Vote put forward to incubator:
1. recommend TLP with guides to help the initial pmc,
2. accept
Welp, I think Owen is probably the best judge here since he has seen them in
Hadoop-ville, and since he probably is way more familiar with the code and its
eventual PMC members than I am. I'll amend my VOTE then.
+1 to Incubation, with TLP-naming (in other words, option #2). I'll try and
join
I agree with Jerome and Chris. I also would opt for plan #2:
incubation with TLP names.
--Ari
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
I agree with the analysis from Jerome and Greg. All three of Chukwa's
current committers are its original contributors. An
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
website/svn/MLs because I think
+1 for 1.
Regards,
Eric
On 6/24/10 12:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
website/svn/MLs
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 21:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
website/svn/MLs because I think
On 6/25/2010 3:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 21:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
Is anyone in agreement with ant? Otherwise we should just move ahead
and can hold a separate vote on allowing tlp resource creation at this
time.
If the proposers want
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:34 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Yes, it seems that Hadoop PMC should supervise the vote for the chair, with
a slightly frustrating cc list of all of the actual committers to chukwa.
That way, nominations and votes for chair are archived on a
Hi,
As one of the initial contributor, I still think that the incubator road is the
good one even if it's just for a short period of time.
The incubator will gives us the ability to get some committers outside of the
initial group of people and to mature the project.
When we will have reach
I agree with the analysis from Jerome and Greg. All three of Chukwa's
current committers are its original contributors. An important- and
often difficult- part of Apache community is growing and managing the
developers working on the project. Some experience adding people in
the Incubator would be
On 6/25/2010 12:40 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
But the Incubator doesn't just say yes/no. We can refer this back to Hadoop
proposing this as a TLP, and even offer the list of mentors as observers, or
members of the initial PMC.
The Hadoop PMC is wholly unqualified to manage Chukwa. It voted
I meant, purely in terms of Hadoop putting forward the TLP motion to the
board, with incubator's endorsement. But let's let options play out and
find out what incubator recommends first. I wasn't suggesting that Hadoop
would have some additional responsibilities here, in terms of mentoring
On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
website/svn/MLs because I think Chukwa should just go directly to a
TLP and if they have to use the incubator
Hrm.
I think my preference is for 1 or 2. Given that Chukwa already has a
fair bit of infrastructure up and running, seems like fewer renames is
better and would reduce user confusion.
--Ari
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:54, Eric Yang ey...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Besides DOAP file and the incubator nomenclature, I may need help identify
the addition responsibilities for Apache PMC. One problem, Chukwa community
did not have a vote for PMC Chair because we are not sure what is the right
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 19:29, Eric Yang ey...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
+1
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:54, Eric Yang ey...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Besides DOAP file and the incubator nomenclature, I may need help identify
the addition responsibilities for Apache PMC. One problem,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:54, Eric Yang ey...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Besides DOAP file and the incubator nomenclature, I may need help
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 19:29, Eric Yang ey...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
The proposal is posted at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
It's best practice to post the full proposal to the list, to have a
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 23:37, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/21/2010 12:29 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
The proposal is posted at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
+1
+1
Added myself
On 6/22/2010 2:42 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:09 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/21/2010 1:31 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Chukwa has been around for a while now and from my (albeit limited)
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:42, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:09 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/21/2010 1:31 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Chukwa has been around for a while now
Besides DOAP file and the incubator nomenclature, I may need help identify
the addition responsibilities for Apache PMC. One problem, Chukwa community
did not have a vote for PMC Chair because we are not sure what is the right
process for this. Meanwhile, I have been writing quarterly report
Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
The proposal is posted at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
Thanks
Regards,
Eric
Hey Guys,
Chukwa has been around for a while now and from my (albeit limited) impression,
pretty successful. What's the rationale for going the Incubator route rather
than putting up a Board TLP resolution? Just wanted to check, thanks guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On 6/21/10 10:29 AM, Eric Yang
On 6/21/2010 1:31 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Chukwa has been around for a while now and from my (albeit limited)
impression, pretty successful. What's the rationale for going the
Incubator route rather than putting up a Board TLP
Hey Owen,
+1, sounds good.
Cheers,
Chris
On 6/21/10 11:31 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Chukwa has been around for a while now and from my (albeit limited)
impression, pretty successful. What's the rationale for
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
The proposal is posted at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
Thanks
Regards,
Eric
On 6/21/10 11:29 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
The proposal is posted at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
+1 (non-binding).
Cheers,
-- Leif
On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache
incubator.
The proposal is posted at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
+1
-
To unsubscribe,
37 matches
Mail list logo