Just catching up on mail (and pretty tired, so forgive me if not everything is clear / using words
not in an English dictionary. )
Henri Yandell wrote:
What do people think to the following:
1) Every existing committer not on the pmc receives an email asking if
they would like to join the pm
Henri Yandell wrote:
What do people think to the following:
1) Every existing committer not on the pmc receives an email asking if
they would like to join the pmc. Once that email is sent they are marked
in a file as having had the email sent and we can wash our hands until a
reply comes in.
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Henri,
What is the procedure for PMC nominations these days? I would like to
propose Roland for PMC nomination. He's been an indispensable member of
the HttpComponents project for many years. What list am I supposed to
send the proposal to? jakarta-
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 15:05 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Roland Weber wrote:
>
> > Hello Henri,
> >
> > I'm one of those whom it concerns: committer but not PMC.
> >
> >> So being on a PMC means that your legal protection is something you're
> >> supposed to be proactive ab
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Matt Benson wrote:
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Matt Benson wrote:
Henri, out of sheer curiosity, where is it
documented
that a commons committer doesn't have a binding
vote?
The only thing I could find in the charter [1] was
a
l
Hi Henri,
> By being a part of the PMC (and active on the PMC if you're an active
> committer), then you are ensuring that the foundation is involved in
> decisions and not just you personally.
Thanks, that sounds much better indeed.
> Sorry to cause worry. It's the other way around from how you
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Roland Weber wrote:
Hello Henri,
I'm one of those whom it concerns: committer but not PMC.
So being on a PMC means that your legal protection is something you're
supposed to be proactive about
Meaning that a PMC member should get an insurance that covers the cost
of la
Hello Henri,
I'm one of those whom it concerns: committer but not PMC.
> So being on a PMC means that your legal protection is something you're
> supposed to be proactive about
Meaning that a PMC member should get an insurance that covers the cost
of lawsuits, or contact a lawyer right away to d
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > Henri, out of sheer curiosity, where is it
> documented
> > that a commons committer doesn't have a binding
> vote?
> > The only thing I could find in the charter [1] was
> a
> > link to the Jakarta guideli
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
well, I always thought that the PMC also has a legal role for the code
that it governs? So there might be committers that don't want to be on
the PMC for that reason.
Yeah, it does. The binding vote of the pmc, which provides oversight f
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Matt Benson wrote:
Henri, out of sheer curiosity, where is it documented
that a commons committer doesn't have a binding vote?
The only thing I could find in the charter [1] was a
link to the Jakarta guidelines [2], which in turn
links to a "Decision Making" page [3], which
11 matches
Mail list logo
