Philipp K. Janert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM:
[snip]
I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to
provide is simply documentation, not different in principle
than Javadoc, only at a higher level.
Except it also contained words such as immature,
- Audience and Marketing:
Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find
something useful for their own projects. (Those users may turn
into contributors over time!)
It takes too much effort to support a user base for a project
that changes rapidly (ie any 'alpha' status code).
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 17:47, Philipp K. Janert wrote:
Dear Friends!
First off, many thanks to Ted for posting my Draft Jakarta
Overview, thus allowing everyone to review it, and many thanks
to all who provided feedback on it, for or against.
I would like to comment on some of the
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 03:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philipp K. Janert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM:
[snip]
I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to
provide is simply documentation, not different in principle
than Javadoc, only at a higher
At 14:47 22.03.2002 -0800, you wrote:
- Audience and Marketing:
The document is directed towards people who may not be familiar
with all the projects that exist under the Jakarta umbrella.
Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find
something useful for their own projects.
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
Hummm...I'll put that comment in the pile of the most important
activity in software development is
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
Hummm...I'll put that comment in the pile of the
Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)
From: Jon Carnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better.
True.
/snip
I agree, but you need a purpose for a release
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:25, Jakarta General Newsgroup wrote:
Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)
From: Jon Carnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless.
Commits/month would be a lot better
Dear Friends!
First off, many thanks to Ted for posting my Draft Jakarta
Overview, thus allowing everyone to review it, and many thanks
to all who provided feedback on it, for or against.
I would like to comment on some of the issues raised.
- Purpose and Redundancy:
To clarify the intended
10 matches
Mail list logo
