Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
>"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: >> >> Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. >> > >> > Ditto. >> >> Doh :) +1 >> >> Pier > >Re me > >+1 > >geir +1 -

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: > > Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > >> > >> +1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. > > > > Ditto. > > Doh :) +1 > > Pier Re me +1 geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Con

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Ted Husted
+1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. Bill Stoddard wrote: > > BSF is IBM's Bean Scripting Framework. Find a description here: > http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/bsf > > Jakarta already hosts some BSF related stuff here: > http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/bsf-doc/intro.html >

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >> >> +1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. > > Ditto. Doh :) +1 Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6/22/01 1:28 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >> >> +1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. > > Ditto. > > - Sam Ruby +1 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additiona

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Sam Ruby
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > +1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. Ditto. - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > The common criteria that we use for any new project is to ask what the > > existing developer and user community is like. I know that there is a large > > user community, but what is the developer community like? > > BSF does not have a large devel

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WA S : XML parser: old version

2001-06-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I'd like to have a release since when I try to rebuild the latest 1.1 (april) I got the following error : Buildfile: build.xml jaxp.jar: [copy] Could not find file /root/crimson-1.1/lib/jaxp.jar to copy. prepare: [mkdir] Created dir: /root/build/crimson [mkdir] Created dir: /root/

Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WAS : XML parser: old version

2001-06-22 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
For Tomcat defintely the best option would be CRIMSON, as it's TINY, fast, compliant, and it works... And it shouldn't crash the whole shit if you have JAXP already installed somewhere Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
My own personal POV is that it would make a welcome addition to the ASF, assuming that it doesn't better "fit in" with a pre-existing project. Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > The common criteria that we use for any new project is to ask what the > > existing developer and user community is like. I kn

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

2001-06-22 Thread Bill Stoddard
> The common criteria that we use for any new project is to ask what the > existing developer and user community is like. I know that there is a large > user community, but what is the developer community like? BSF does not have a large developer community; Victor, Chuck and perhaps 3 other folks

RE: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4?

2001-06-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
> What I really think should happen is that Sun should manage the >language (things like syntax, language enhancements and things >that abstract >the hardware). If they want to, they could have a separate group that >programs extensions, but these should be optional and not >bundled with

RE: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4?

2001-06-22 Thread Randy Layman
> -Original Message- > From: Endre Stølsvik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? > > > > Isn't it actually quite cool that Sun is including lots of > functionality > with it's

FW: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be put in ? : WA S : XML parser: old version

2001-06-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Thanks for any POSITIVE comments. >From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:42 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.x RPMS : Which XML Parser to be >put in ? : WA S : XML parser: old version > > >>> I launch that poll to see if which XML pars

Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4?

2001-06-22 Thread Endre Stølsvik
[ -- cut -- ] | A couple of years ago, Rick Ross wrote an editorial about the problem of | Sun putting Java companies out of business by putting the functionality | of their products into the Java core ("Tools Before Jewels", Java Developer's | Journal, April 1999 http://www.sys-con.com/java/arc