> What I really think should happen is that Sun should manage the >language (things like syntax, language enhancements and things >that abstract >the hardware). If they want to, they could have a separate group that >programs extensions, but these should be optional and not >bundled with the >JVM (after all, bundling with a package is what got Microsoft >in trouble). +1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Jon Stevens
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Edwin Martin
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Jon Stevens
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Bernie Bernstein
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Shane_Curcuru
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Jon Stevens
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Daniel F. Savarese
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Karl-Heinz Kolle
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Endre St�lsvik
- RE: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Randy Layman
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? GOMEZ Henri
- Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4? Peter Donald
